京津冀水资源脆弱性评价

刘瑜洁; 刘俊国; 赵旭; 张颖

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2016.03.036

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

京津冀水资源脆弱性评价

试验研究

- 京津冀水资源脆弱性评价
- Assessment of Vulnerability of Water Resources in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region
- 水土保持通报 2016年36卷第3期页码：211-218
- 作者机构：
  
  北京林业大学自然保护区学院,北京,100083
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  北京市自然科学基金项目“京津冀水足迹演变驱动机制与水资源调控分析”（8151002）;国家自然科学基金项目“京津冀水资源短缺演变规律及驱动机制”（41571022）;国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项（2015ZX07203-005）;北京市教育委员会科学研究与研究生培养共建项目
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2016.03.036
  中图分类号：
- 纸质出版：2016
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
刘瑜洁, 刘俊国, 赵旭, 等. 京津冀水资源脆弱性评价[J]. 水土保持通报, 2016,36(3):211-218.

LIU Yujie, LIU Junguo, ZHAO Xu, et al. Assessment of Vulnerability of Water Resources in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2016, 36(3): 211-218.
刘瑜洁, 刘俊国, 赵旭, 等. 京津冀水资源脆弱性评价[J]. 水土保持通报, 2016,36(3):211-218. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2016.03.036.

LIU Yujie, LIU Junguo, ZHAO Xu, et al. Assessment of Vulnerability of Water Resources in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2016, 36(3): 211-218. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2016.03.036.

摘要

［目的］评价京津冀水资源脆弱性，为京津冀水资源管理提供理论依据与数据支撑。［方法］选取人口密集、经济发达、水资源问题极为突出的京津冀区域，采用水足迹的理论与方法，构建了集水资源压力-发展压力-污染压力-水资源管理压力（RDHM）于一体的水资源脆弱性评价指标体系，采用层次分析法确定不同指标的权重，对该区域2003-2013年水资源脆弱性进行了评价。［结果］京津冀地区面临着水资源禀赋差，开发利用强度大，污染严重，水资源管理力度区域差异大等问题。北京市在水资源管理方面水平相对较高，但水污染压力长期没有得到有效缓解；天津市虽然在水资源管理上获得了长足的进步，但水资源脆弱性有增无减，其水资源问题的解决亟需寻找新的途径；河北省水资源管理相对京津地区差距较大，水资源脆弱性逐年突显，成为京津冀地区水资源问题的短板。［结论］缓解区域水污染压力，正视河北省水资源管理的滞后性，统一配置水资源，缩小水资源脆弱性区域差异在京津冀一体化背景下势在必行。

Abstract

[Objective] Assessment of the vulnerability of water resources in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei(BTH) region was carried out in order to provide theoretical and data support for water resources management.[Methods] This study focuses on the vulnerability of water resources in BTH

a highly populated and developed region yet with serious water resource problems. An indicator system of water resources vulnerability was established by integrating resource pressure

development pressure

pollution pressure and management pressure(RDPM) using the concept theories of water footprint while analytic hierarchy process was used to determine the weights of different indicators. Then the water vulnerability was assessed from 2003 to 2013 for the BTH region.[Results] The BTH region was exposed to problems such as poor water resources endowments

high water exploitation

serious water pollution and unbalanced management. Beijing City had a relatively high level of water resources management

it still suffered from serious water pollution. Tianjin City has made a great progress in water resources management

but the water resources vulnerability did not show a declining signal and new management approaches need to be explored. Compared to Beijing and Tianjin City in terms of water resources management

there is a big lag in Hebei Province

whose water resources vulnerability seems to be more serious in these years. As a result

Hebei has been a "short slab" of water resources management in the BTH region.[Conclusion] It is imperative to relieve the pressure on water pollution

increase the management strategies in Hebei Province

allocate water resources reasonably and improve water management in all BTH regions.

关键词

Keywords

references

United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization. The UN World Water Development Report(WWDR4).[Z].the 4th ed.2012.

World Economic Forum. Global risks 2015[Z]. the 10th ed. World Economic Forum, Geneva, 2015.

贾绍凤,吕爱峰,韩雁,等.中国水资源安全报告[Z].北京:科学出版社,2014.

王丽.京津冀地区资源开发利用与环境保护研究[J].经济研究参考,2015(2):47-71.

李孟颖,陈介山.京津冀地区面向人居环境之水安全格局初探[J].安全与环境学报,2015,15(3):347-355.

李彦军,叶裕民,倪稞.城市群内城乡统筹的理论基础与现实依据[J].中国人口.资源与环境,2008,18(5):46-52.

魏进平,刘鑫洋,魏娜.京津冀协同发展的历程回顾、现实困境与突破路径[J].河北工业大学学报:社会科学版,2014,6(2):1-6.

王一文,李伟,王亦宁,等.推进京津冀水资源保护一体化的思考[J].中国水利,2015(1):1-4.

National Research C. Ground Water Vulnerability Assessment-predicting Relative Contamination Potential Under Conditions of Uncertainty[M].Washington D C: National Academy Press, 1993.

Brouwer F, Falkenmark M. Climate-induced water availability changes in Europe[J]. Envionmental Monitoring and Assessment, 1989,13(1):75-89.

唐国平,李秀彬,刘燕华.全球气候变化下水资源脆弱性及其评估方法[J].地球科学进展,2000,15(3):313-317.

刘绿柳.水资源脆弱性及其定量评价[J].水土保持通报,2002,22(2):41-44.

邹君,杨玉蓉,谢小立.地表水资源脆弱性:概念、内涵及定量评价[J].水土保持通报,2007,27(2):132-135.

邹君,傅双同,毛德华.中国南方湿润区水资源脆弱度评价及其管理:以湖南省衡阳市为例[J].水土保持通报,2008,28(2):76-80.

夏军,石卫,陈俊旭,等.变化环境下水资源脆弱性及其适应性调控研究:以海河流域为例[J].水利水电技术,2015,46(6):27-33.

Perry C. Efficient irrigation: Inefficient communication, flawed recommendations[J]. Irrigation and Drainage, 2007,56(4):367-378.

United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. International decade for action water for life, 2005-2015[EB/OL]. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. http://www.un.org/waterforlifedecade/.

Aldaya M M, Chapagain A K, Hoekstra A Y, et al. The Water Footprint Assessment Manual: Setting the Global Standard[M]. New York: Routledge, 2012.

Hoekstra A Y. Human appropriation of natural capital:A comparison of ecological footprint and water footprint analysis[J]. Ecological Economics, 2009,68(7):1963-1974.

Falkenmark M, Widstrand C. "Population and Water Resources: A Delicate Balance, "in Population Bulletin[M]. Washington D C: Population Reference Bureau, 1992.

Declaration B. The Brisbane Declaration: Environmental flows are essential for freshwater ecosystem health and human well-being. 10th[Z]. International River Symposium, Brisbane, Australia, 2007.

Smakhtin V, Revenga C, D ll P. A pilot global assessment of environmental water requirements and scarcity[J]. International Water Resources Association, 2004,29(3):307-317.

张明月,彭定志,钱鞠.疏勒河流域昌马灌区水资源脆弱性分析[J].南水北调与水利科技,2012,10(2):104-106.

Srinivasan V, Karen C S K, Ruth E, et al. The impact of urbanization on water vulnerability: A coupled human-environment system approach for Chennai, India[J]. Global Environmental Change, 23(1):229-239.

浏览量

1102

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

干旱区绿洲-荒漠化演变中的水足迹表征研究——以新疆天山北坡为例

基于水足迹理论的江苏省水资源可持续利用评价

基于作物需水量的城市农业水资源评估——以贵州省贵阳市为例

基于三维水足迹-LMDI的安徽省水资源压力及驱动力分析

融雪期微地形对土壤水分时空分布的影响及短期预测