1. 北京圣海林生态环境科技股份有限公司,北京,100083
2. 北京市门头沟区水务局,北京,102300
纸质出版:2016
移动端阅览
赵方莹, 刘飞, 程婕, 等. 北京市灵山亚高山草甸植被群落特征[J]. 水土保持通报, 2016,36(3):165-171.
ZHAO Fangying, LIU Fei, CHENG Jie, et al. Vegetation Characteristics of Subalpine Meadow Community in Lingshan Mountain of Beijing City[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2016, 36(3): 165-171.
赵方莹, 刘飞, 程婕, 等. 北京市灵山亚高山草甸植被群落特征[J]. 水土保持通报, 2016,36(3):165-171. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2016.03.030.
ZHAO Fangying, LIU Fei, CHENG Jie, et al. Vegetation Characteristics of Subalpine Meadow Community in Lingshan Mountain of Beijing City[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2016, 36(3): 165-171. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2016.03.030.
[目的] 计算分析北京市灵山亚高山草甸区内自然坡面和侵蚀沟道两种立地类型上的植物群落特征差异,为侵蚀沟道植被人工修复提供理论依据和技术支撑。[方法] 采用野外调查和统计分析相结合的方法,对不同立地类型上的植被群落特征进行了研究。[结果] (1) Shannon-Wiener指数、Margalef指数均表现为:侵蚀沟道<自然坡面,而Simpson指数、Pielou指数表现为:侵蚀沟道>自然坡面;(2) 侵蚀沟道与自然坡面群落相似性系数为0.884,β多样性指数为0.178,表明侵蚀沟植物群落组成与自然坡面的相似性较高;(3) 自然坡面和侵蚀沟道内硬质早熟禾(Poa sphondylodes Trin)、苔草(Carex dispalata)的重要值和生态位宽度均较大,为主要的优势种;多数物种之间存在生态位重叠,但重叠值较小。[结论] 侵蚀沟道处于演替初期,趋向于恢复到群落自然状态,硬质早熟禾和苔草为主要的先锋优势种。
[Objective] The characteristics of plant communities in the natural slope and erosion gully of the subalpine meadow in Lingshan Mountain in Beijing City were investigated and analyzed to provide theoretical basis and technical support for vegetation restoration in erosion gullies.[Methods] The characteristics of plant communities at different sites were studied using the methods of standard ecological investigation methods and statistical analysis.[Results] (1) The Shannon-Wiener index and Margalef index were all as follows:erosion gullynatural slope; (2) The community similarity coefficient and β diversity index between the community of the natural slope and erosion gully were 0.884 and 0.178
respectively
which mean the plant community composition in erosion gullies and natural slopes had higher similarity; (3) The niche breadth and the important value of Poa sphondylodes Trin and Carex dispalata were larger both in the natural slope and erosion gully
which showed that these two species were main dominant species. In addition
most species had niche overlap in both natural slope and erosion gully
but the niche overlap values were relatively small.[Conclusion] Erosion gully is in the early succession and tend to restore the natural state. P. sphondylodes Trin and C. dispalata are the pioneer dominant species of community.
王琳,张金屯,欧阳华.历山山地草甸的生态关系[J].山地学报,2004,22(6):669-674.
江洪.东灵山植物群落生活型谱的比较研究[J].植物学报,1994,36(11):884-894.
李军玲,张金屯,郭逍宇.关帝山亚高山灌丛草甸群落优势种群的生态位研究[J].西北植物学报,2003,23(12):2081-2088.
李斌,李素清,张金屯.云顶山亚高山草甸优势种群生态位研究[J].草业学报,2010,19(1):6-13.
宋爱云,刘世荣,史作民,等.卧龙自然保护区亚高山草甸的数量分类与排序[J].应用生态学报,2006,17(7):1174-1178.
宋晓谕.甘南亚高山草甸弃耕演替过程中植物群落特征变化模式研究[D].兰州:兰州大学,2010.
纪磊,干友民,罗元佳,等.川西北不同退化程度高山草甸和亚高山草甸的植被特征[J].草业科学,2011,28(6):1101-1105
马克平,黄建辉,于顺利,等.北京东灵山地区植物群落多样性的研究(Ⅱ):丰富度、均匀度和物种多样性指数[J].生态学报,1995,15(3):268-277.
高贤明,马克平,陈灵芝,等.旅游对北京东灵山亚高山草甸物种多样性影响的初步研究[J].生物多样性,2002,10(2):189-195.
向春玲,张金屯.东灵山亚高山草甸物种多样性变化及其影响因子[J].北京师范大学学报:自然科学版,2009,45(3):275-278.
刘晓.北京东灵山亚高山草甸维管植物区系与多样性研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2011.
李薇,潘祺志,唐海萍.北京东灵山亚高山草甸旅游开发与保护研究[J].资源开发与市场,2007,23(1):81-83.
高俊峰.北京东灵山地区人类活动对植物多样性分布的影响研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2007.
徐广平,张德罡,徐长林,等.东祁连山高寒草地不同生境类型植物群落α及β多样性的初步研究[J].草业科学,2006,23(6):1-5.
Tilinan D. Cause consequences and ethics of biodiversity[J]. Nature,2000(405):208-211.
邱波,任青吉,罗燕江,等.高寒草甸不同生境类型植物群落的α及β多样性研究[J].西北植物学报,2004,24(4):655-661.
王世昌.云顶山亚高山草甸物种多样性研究[J].山西林业科技,2011,40(3):17-19,23.
白永飞,邢雪荣,许志信,等.内蒙古高原针茅草原群落
β
多样性研究[J].应用生态学报,2000,11(3):408-412.
李明,蒋德明,押田敏雄,等.科尔沁沙地人工固沙群落草本植物种群生态位特征[J].草业科学,2009,26(8):10-16.
杜国祯,王刚.亚高山草甸弃耕地演替群落的种多样性及种间相关分析[J]. 草业科学,1991,8(4):53-57.
0
浏览量
1483
下载量
2
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621