1. 内蒙古农业大学 水利与土木建筑工程学院,内蒙古,呼和浩特,010018
2. 塔里木大学,新疆,阿拉尔市,843300
3. 水利部 牧区水利科学研究所,内蒙古,呼和浩特,010020
纸质出版:2016
移动端阅览
岳胜如, 李瑞平, 邹春霞, 等. 基于多波段MODIS遥感数据的乌审旗土壤含水量监测研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2016,36(2):146-150.
YUE Shengru, LI Ruiping, ZOU Chunxia, et al. Soil Moisture Monitoring Based on Multichannel MODIS Remote Sensing Data in Wushen Banner[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2016, 36(2): 146-150.
岳胜如, 李瑞平, 邹春霞, 等. 基于多波段MODIS遥感数据的乌审旗土壤含水量监测研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2016,36(2):146-150. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2016.02.028.
YUE Shengru, LI Ruiping, ZOU Chunxia, et al. Soil Moisture Monitoring Based on Multichannel MODIS Remote Sensing Data in Wushen Banner[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2016, 36(2): 146-150. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2016.02.028.
[目的] 探究内蒙古自治区乌审旗地区土壤含水量与表观热惯量的响应关系
提高土壤含水量遥感监测精度
使观测分析结果更具说服力和可靠性。[方法] 选取多波段MODIS遥感数据和表观热惯量法
采用重复的地面采样方案设计
减弱单点采样代表性差的影响。[结果] 该方案设计较单点采样方法相关系数有明显提高
对0-10 cm
0-20 cm
0-30 cm土壤含水量相关系数分别为0.587
0.658和0.650。对回归模型进行精度验证
得其含水量平均相对误差为21.53%
26.67%
22.83%。[结论] 重复的地面采样方案下
基于表观热惯量的乌审旗土壤含水率监测结果更加科学、可靠。
[Objective] The relationship between soil moisture content and the apparent thermal inertia was examined based on the data collected from Wushen Banner of Inner Mongolia
to improve the monitoring accuracy of soil moisture content and to make the results more convincing and reliable. [Methods] Multi-band MODIS remote sensing data and ATI(apparent thermal inertia) method were used. A point-repeated ground sampling scheme was adopted to diminish the poor representativeness of single sampling method in a point. [Results] It was indicated that the correlation coefficient in the present design was significantly higher than that of single sampling method. For the relationships observed in the soil layers of 0-10 cm
0-20 cm and 0-30 cm
the coefficients were all high
with values of 0.587
0.658 and 0.650
respectively. The above regression models had different goodness with their averaged relative errors in predicting the measured water content. The averaged relative errors were 21.53%
26.67% and 22.83%
respectively. [Conclusion] Under point-repeated sampling scheme
the ATI-based monitoring results of water content in Uushen Banner were more reliable.
覃志豪,高懋芳,秦晓敏,等.农业旱灾监测中的地表温度遥感反演方法:以MODIS数据为例[J].自然灾害学报,2005,14(4):64-71.
Watson K, Rowen L C. Application of thermal modeling in the geologic interpretation of IR images[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1975,63(1):128-137.
Price J C. Thermal inertia mapping:A new view of the earth[J]. Journal of Geophysical Reserch, 1977,82(18):2582-2590.
张仁华.试验遥感模型及地面基础[M].北京:科学出版社,1996.
张仁华.改进的热惯量模式及遥感土壤水分[J].地理研究,1990,9(2):101-112.
张仁华,孙晓敏,朱治林,等.以微分热惯量为基础的地面蒸发的全遥感信息模型及其在甘肃沙坡头地区的验证[J].中国科学(D辑):地球科学,2002,32(12):1041-1050.
马春峰,王维真,吴月茹,等.基于MODIS数据的黑河流域土壤热惯量反演研究[J].遥感技术与应用,2012,27(2):197-207.
隋洪智,田国良.热惯量方法监测土壤水分[M]//田国良.黄河流域典型地区遥感动态研究.北京:科学出版社,1990.
Liang Shunlin. Narrowband to broadband conversions of land surface albedo(I):Algorithms[J]. Remote Sensing of Enviroment, 2001,76(2):213-238.
蔡国印.基于MODIS数据的地表温度热惯量反演研究及其在土壤水分、地气间热交换方面的应用[D].北京:中国科学院研究生院,2005.
Qin Z, Dall'O G, Karnieli A, et al. Derivation of split window algorithm and its sensitivity analysis for retrieving land surface temperature from NOAA-AVHRR data[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 2001,106(19):22655-22670.
贾芳,樊贵盛.土壤质地与田间持水率关系的研究[J].山西水土保持科技,2007,9(3):17-19.
乌兰,乌兰巴特尔,李云鹏.内蒙古自治区生态与农牧业气象服务体系研究[M].北京:气象出版社,2009.
姚春生,张增祥,汪潇.使用温度植被干旱指数法(TVDI)反演新疆土壤湿度[J].遥感技术与应用,2004,19(6):474-478.
闫娜,李登科,杜继稳,等.基于MODIS产品LST/NDVI/EVI的陕西旱情监测[J].自然灾害学报,2010,19(4):178-182.
张红卫,陈怀亮,申双和.基于EOS/MODIS数据的土壤水分遥感监测方法[J].科技导报,2009,27(12):85-92.
赵英时.遥感应用分析原理与方法[M].北京:科学出版社,2003.
刘振华,赵英时.一种改进的遥感热惯量模型初探[J].中国科学院研究生院学报,2005,22(3):380-385.
王丽莉.利用MODIS数据反演土壤含水量:以吉林省西部为例[D].吉林 长春:东北师范大学,2008.
孙灏,陈云浩,孙洪泉,等.典型农业干旱遥感监测指数的比较及分类体系[J].农业工程学报,2012,28(14):147-154.
陈阳,范建容,郭芬芬,等.条件植被温度指数在云南干旱监测中的应用[J].农业工程学报,2011,27(5):231-236.
曾波.湖南省农业干旱空间分布研究[D].湖南 长沙:中南林业科技大学,2014.
0
浏览量
1313
下载量
1
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621