1. 浙江省临安市林业种苗管理站, 浙江 临安,311300
2. 浙江省开化县林业局, 浙江 开化,324300
3. 浙江农林大学 浙江省森林生态系统碳循环 与固碳减排重点实验室, 浙江 临安,311300
4. 浙江省临安市林业科技推广总站, 浙江 临安,311300
纸质出版:2016
移动端阅览
邵香君, 徐建春, 吴家森, 等. 山核桃集约经营过程中土壤微生物量碳氮的变化[J]. 水土保持通报, 2016,36(2):72-75.
SHAO Xiangjun, XU Jianchun, WU Jiasen, et al. Changes in Soil Microbial Biomass Carbon and Nitrogen of Carya Cathayensis Plantations Under Intensive Managements[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2016, 36(2): 72-75.
邵香君, 徐建春, 吴家森, 等. 山核桃集约经营过程中土壤微生物量碳氮的变化[J]. 水土保持通报, 2016,36(2):72-75. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2016.02.014.
SHAO Xiangjun, XU Jianchun, WU Jiasen, et al. Changes in Soil Microbial Biomass Carbon and Nitrogen of Carya Cathayensis Plantations Under Intensive Managements[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2016, 36(2): 72-75. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2016.02.014.
[目的] 研究不同集约经营历史山核桃林的土壤微生物量碳氮的演变规律
为山核桃林地土壤管理提供科学依据。[方法] 在浙江省临安市分别采集并分析了经营历史为5
10
15
20 a的山核桃林土壤样品
并与天然混交林(0 a)进行比较。[结果] 天然混交林改造为山核桃纯林并经集约经营后
林地土壤微生物量碳(MBC)、微生物量氮(MBN)、MBC/MBN
MBC/SOC均表现出先下降而后上升的趋势
经过10 a经营后降到最低水平
与0 a相比
0-10 cm土层MBC
MBN和MBC/SOC分别降低了52.1%
32.0%和31.0%。经营10 a的林地土壤MBC/MBN显著低于前期经营林地
而MBN/TN在经营过程中的差异并不显著。[结论] 山核桃集约经营后
林地土壤微生物量碳氮含量显著下降。
[Objective] The differences of soil microbial biomass carbon(MBC) and microbial biomass nitrogen(MBN) in Carya cathayensis stands with different management intensification were explored to provide scientific basis for soil management.[Methods] Soil MBC and MBN collected from four intensive-managed forests(IMF) (5
10
15 and 20 years
respectively) were assayed and compared with the corresponding values of natural broadleaf forest(0 year).[Results] Soil MBC and MBN
MBC/MBN and MBC/SOC decreased significantly at the first 10 years after conversion from evergreen and deciduous broadleaf forest(EDBE) to intensive-managed forest(IMF)
and then increased slowly. In comparison with the corresponding value of EDBF(0 year)
MBC
MBN and MBC/SOC in 0-10 cm soil layer of chinese hickory forest with 10-year intensive management decreased by 52.1%
32.0% and 31.0%
respectively. These indices were also lower than those corresponding values of stands with other intensive management years. Soil MBC/MBN with 10-year intensive management was lower than the values of stand before 10-years; Soil MBN/TN remained stable under different years. [Conclusion] Soil MBC and MBN of Carya cathayensis stands decreased remarkably after intensive-management was conducted.
赵彤,闫浩,蒋跃利,等.黄土丘陵区植被类型对土壤微生物量碳氮磷的影响[J].生态学报,2013,.33(18):5615-5622.
Ladd J N, Amato M, Veen H A. Soil microbial biomass:Its assay and role in turnover of organic matter C and N[J].Soil Biology & Biochemistry,2004,36(9):1369-1372.
Blouin M, Zuily F Y, Phamthi A T, et al. Belowground organism activities affect plant above ground phenotype, inducing plant tolerance to parasites[J].Ecology Letters, 2005,8(2):202-208.
商素云,李永夫,姜培坤,等.天然灌木林改造成板栗林对土壤碳库和氮库的影响[J].应用生态学报,2012,23(3):659-665.
徐秋芳,田甜,吴家森,等.退化板栗林(套)改种茶树和毛竹后土壤生物学性质变化[J].水土保持学报,2011,25(3):180-184.
周国模,徐建明,吴家森,等.毛竹林集约经营过程中土壤活性有机碳库的演变[J].林业科学,2006,42(6):24-128.
张涛,李永夫,姜培坤,等.长期集约经营对雷竹林土壤碳氮磷库特征的影响[J].土壤学报,2012,49(6):1170-1177.
吴家森,张金池,黄坚钦,等.浙江省临安市山核桃产区林地土壤有机碳分布特征[J].浙江大学学报:农业与生命科学版,2013,39(4):413-420.
王正加,黄兴召,唐小华,等.山核桃免耕经营的经济效益和生态效益[J].生态学报,2011,31(8):2281-2289.
吴家森.山核桃人工林土壤有机碳变化特征[D].江苏南京:南京林业大学,2014.
鲁如坤.土壤农业化学分析方法[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社,1999.
Arevalo C B M, Bhatti J S, Chang S X, et al. Ecosystem carbon stocks and distribution under different land-use in north central Alberta[J].Forest Ecology and Management, 2009,257(8):1776-1785.
Batlle B L, Batjes N H, Bindraban P S. Changes in organic carbon stocks upon land use conversion in the Brazilian Cerrado:A review[J].Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2010,137(1):47-58.
Wu Jiasen, Jiang Peikun, Chang S X, et al. Dissolved soil organic carbon and nitrogen were affected by conversion of native forests to plantations in subtropical China[J]. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 2010,90(1):27-36.
叶晶,吴家森,张金池,等.不同经营年限山核桃林地枯落物和土壤的水文效应[J].水土保持通报,2014,34(3):87-91.
安韶山,李国辉,陈利顶.宁南山区典型植物根际与非根际土壤微生物功能多样性[J].生态学报,2011,31(18):5225-5234.
张成娥,杜社妮,白岗栓,等.黄土塬区果园套种对土壤微生物及酶活性的影响[J].土壤与环境,2001,10(2):121-123.
0
浏览量
1039
下载量
4
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621