1. 水利水资源安徽省重点实验室,安徽,蚌埠,233000
2. 安徽省(水利部淮河水利委员会)水利科学研究院,安徽,合肥,230088
纸质出版:2016
移动端阅览
张卫. 皖西大别山区不同土地利用类型的土壤抗侵蚀性——以安徽省岳西县为例[J]. 水土保持通报, 2016,36(2):38-41.
ZHANG Wei. Soil Anti-erodibility Under Different Landuse Types in Dabie Mountainous Area of Western Anhui Province——A Case Study in Yuexi County of Anhui Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2016, 36(2): 38-41.
张卫. 皖西大别山区不同土地利用类型的土壤抗侵蚀性——以安徽省岳西县为例[J]. 水土保持通报, 2016,36(2):38-41. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2016.02.008.
ZHANG Wei. Soil Anti-erodibility Under Different Landuse Types in Dabie Mountainous Area of Western Anhui Province——A Case Study in Yuexi County of Anhui Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2016, 36(2): 38-41. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2016.02.008.
[目的] 对皖西大别山区不同土地利用类型土壤抗侵蚀性进行研究
为防治区域水土流失提供理论支持。[方法] 测试并分析研究区不同土地利用类型下土壤崩解速率和土壤抗冲性指标。[结果] 土壤崩解速率V和抗冲性H在数值上随着坡位下降而增大
表明土壤抗侵蚀能力降低。不同土地利用类型土壤抵抗流水冲刷和水体分散能力的强弱关系均表现为:马尾松林地 > 茶园 > 荒地;表现在崩解速率V值方面
马尾松林地不同坡位分别为-0.16
-0.11和0.03 g/min
茶园分别为0.20
0.24和0.52 g/min
荒地分别为0.12
0.60和0.82 g/min。[结论] 不同土地利用类型下土壤崩解速率与抗冲性之间存在着良好的直线递增关系
其中
荒地土壤崩解性能随抗冲性变化速率最快
马尾松林地与茶园二者直线斜率差异不大。
[Objective] Soil anti-erodibility under different landuse types in the Dabie mountainous area of Western Anhui Province was researched to provide basis for soil erosion control. [Methods] Soil anti-sourability and disintegration rate under different landuse types were tested and analyzed. [Results] Soil anti-sourability and disintegration rate increased with the drop of slope position
indicating a decrease in soil anti-erodibility. Landuse types
in terms of soil anti-sourability and disintegration rate
ranked in a descendant order as Pinus massonian woodland
tea plantation
and wasteland. The values of soil disintegration rate of different landuses were listed as follows: Pinus massonian woodland
-0.16
-0.11 and 0.03 g/min; tea plantation
0.20
0.24 and 0.52 g/min; wasteland
0.12
0.60 and 0.82 g/min. [Conclusion] For all the three landuse types
the relation between the anti-sourability and the disintegration rate presented obvious positive linearity. Soil disintergration rate for wasteland varied fast as soil anti-sourability changed and slope gradient of the linear equation was 0.246. There does not exist obvious difference between the linear equation slope gradient of tea plantation and that of Pinus massonian woodland.
郑粉莉,王占礼,杨勤科.我国土壤侵蚀科学研究回顾和展望[J].自然杂志,2008,30(1):12-16.
Elison W D. Soil erosion studies[J]. Agricultural Engineering, 1947,28(4):15-146.
Wischmeier W H, Smith D. D. Predieting Rainfall Erosion Losses:A Guide to Conservation Planning[M]. Washington D C:USDA Agriculture Handbook, 1978.
Gussak V B. Advice for the rapid detennination of erodibility of soils and some results of its applieation[J]. Abstract in Soils and Fertilizers, 1946,10:41.
赵洋毅,周运超,段旭.黔中喀斯特地区不同岩性土壤的抗蚀抗冲性研究[J].安徽农业科学,2007,35(29):9311-9313,9317.
陈晏,史东梅,文卓立,等.紫色土丘陵区不同土地利用类型土壤抗冲性特征研究[J].水土保持学报,2007,21(2):24-27,35.
罗利芳,张科利,李双才.撂荒后黄土高原坡耕地土壤透水性和抗冲性的变化[J].地理科学,2003,23(6):728-732.
蒋定生,李新华,范兴科.黄土高原水土流失严重地区土壤抗蚀性的水平变化和垂直变化规律[J].水土保持学报,1995,9(2):1-8.
蒋定生.黄土区不同利用类型土壤抗冲能力的研究[J].土壤通报,1979(4):20-29.
刘国彬,张光辉.原状土冲刷法与人工模拟降雨法研究土壤抗冲性对比分析[J].水土保持通报,1996,16(2):32-37.
蒋定生.黄土高原水土流失与治理模式[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,1997.
曾光,杨勤科,姚志宏.黄土丘陵沟壑区不同土地利用类型土壤抗侵蚀性研究[J].水土保持通报,2008,28(1):6-9,38.
庄家尧,张金池,林杰,等.安徽大别山区上舍小流域植被根系与土壤抗冲性研究[J].中国水土保持科学,2007,5(6):15-20.
李勇,朱显谟.黄土高原土壤抗冲性机理初步研究[J].科学通报,1990,35(5):390-393.
李勇,朱显谟.黄土高原植物根系提高土壤抗冲性的有效性[J].科学通报,1991,36(12):935-938.
吕春娟,白中科,陈卫国,等.黄土区大型排土场植被根系的抗蚀抗冲性研究[J].水土保持学报,2006,20(2):35-38,143.
查小春,唐克丽.黄土丘陵林区开垦地土壤抗冲性的时间变化研究[J].水土保持通报,2001,21(2):8-11.
吴素业.安徽大别山区降雨侵蚀力指标的研究[J].中国水土保持,1992(2):32-33.
吴素业.皖西南山区坡耕地水土流失防治措施[J].水土保持研究,1996,3(4):38-39,92.
吴素业.安徽大别山区坡耕地土壤流失量回归方程的研究[J].水土保持通报,1993,13(4):26-29.
朱显谟.甘肃中部土壤侵蚀调查报告[R].土壤专辑,1958(32):53-109.
0
浏览量
1292
下载量
1
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621