1. 兰州大学 资源环境学院,甘肃,兰州,730000
2. 云南师范大学 旅游与地理科学学院,云南,昆明,650500
纸质出版:2016
移动端阅览
曾建军, 史正涛. 城市水源地5种森林枯落物水文效应特征[J]. 水土保持通报, 2016,36(1):38-43.
ZENG Jianjun, SHI Zhengtao. Water-holding Capacity of Litters in Five Different Typical Forest Types in Urban Water Source[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2016, 36(1): 38-43.
曾建军, 史正涛. 城市水源地5种森林枯落物水文效应特征[J]. 水土保持通报, 2016,36(1):38-43. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2016.01.008.
ZENG Jianjun, SHI Zhengtao. Water-holding Capacity of Litters in Five Different Typical Forest Types in Urban Water Source[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2016, 36(1): 38-43. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2016.01.008.
[目的
]
探讨云南省蒙自市菲白城市水源地5种主要森林类型林下枯落物的持水效应特征
为菲白水源地营造水土保持林、水源涵养林提供理论依据. [方法
]
利用样方调查法、烘干法、浸泡法对其枯落物蓄积量、持水量、吸水速率、最大持水能力和拦蓄量等进行了研究. [结果
]
各林分总蓄积量相差较大
依次为:杉木林> 华山松+杉木> 人工柏树林> 青冈栎+云南松> 人工桉树林;不同森林类型枯落物最大持水量变化范围7.85~13.91 t/hm
2
最大持水率为165.85%~242.45%
最大拦蓄量为7.48~12.62 t/hm
2
有效拦蓄量为6.53~11.03 t/hm
2
;5种森林枯落物持水量与时间呈较显著的对数函数关系
各层与浸水时间之间存在着显著的幂函数关系. [结论
]
综合比较5种森林类型的持水性能
杉树的持水能力较好
能够很好地涵养水源.
[Objective] To clarify the water holding capacity of forest litters of 5 different forest types (Cupressus funebris
Pinus armandii+Cunninghamia lanceolata
Cyclobalanopsis glauca+ Pinus yunnanensis
Eucalyptus robusta
C. lanceolata) in Feibai reservoir area in Mengzi City of Yunan Province in order to provide theoretical basis for constructing the forest of water and soil conservation
and for constructing the forest of conservation of water supply in the study area. [Methods] We used the quadrat sampling method
oven drying method and soaking method to determine the litter preservation
water holding capacity
water absorption rate and water interception. [Results] The litter amount in different forests followed an order of C. lanceolata(9.48 t/hm2)> P. armandii+ C. lanceolata(7.09 t/hm2)> C. funebris(7.02 t/hm2)> C. glauca+ P. yunnanensis(6.13 t/hm2)> E. robusta(3.20 t/hm2);The maximum water holding volume of different forests litters ranged from 7.85 to 13.91 t/hm2
the maximum water holding rate ranged from 165.85% to 242.45%
and the maximum interception amount and the effective interception amount ranged from 7.48 to 12.62 t/hm2 and 6.53 to 11.03 t/hm2 respectively. The relationships between water-holding rate and immersion time in 5 different forest types were significantly fitted by logarithmic equation. The relationships between water absorption speed rate and soaking time could be described by power function. [Conclusion] The comprehensive analysis of water holding capacity of 5 different species indicated that Eucalyptus has a higher water-holding capacity and is more beneficial to the water conservation.
曾建军,史正涛,刘新有,等.基于集对分析的云南高原盆地城市水源地脆弱性评价[J].长江流域资源与环境2014.23(7):1038-1044.
刘征,赵旭阳.河北省水源涵养生态功能保护区划分研究[J].水土保持通报2008,28(2):180-183.
黄英,王杰,黄松柏,等.昆明市松华坝水源区小流域土壤侵蚀分析[J].长江科学院院报,2013,30(4):21-24.
曾建军,史正涛,刘新有,等.高原盆地城市水源地脆弱性评价[J].中国农村水利水电,2013(9):12-15.
William M P, Cordery I. Estimation of interception capacity of the forest floor[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 1996,180(1):283-299.
Motohisa F, Tetsya K, Valdir C, et al. Hydrological processes at two subtropical forest catchments: The Serra do Mar, Sao Paulo, Brazil[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 1997,196(1):26-46.
刘宇,张洪江,张友焱,等.晋西黄土丘陵区不同人工林枯落物持水特性研究[J].水土保持通报,2013,33,(6):69-74.
张卫强,李召青,周平,等.东江中上游主要森林类型枯落物的持水特性[J].水土保持学报,2010,24(5):130-134.
张振明,余新晓,牛健植,等.不同林分枯落物层的水文生态功能[J].水土保持学报,2005,19(3):139-143.
周祥,赵一鹤,张洪江,等.云南高原典型林分林下枯落物持水特征研究[J].生态环境学报,2011,20(2):248-252.
王波,张洪江,杜士才,等.三峡库区天然次生林凋落物森林水文效应研究[J].水土保持通报,2009,29(3):83-87.
梁文俊,丁国栋,周美思,等.冀北山地油松和落叶松林下枯落物的水文效应[J].水土保持通报,2012,32(4):71-74.
郑文辉,林开敏,徐昇,等.7种不同树种凋落叶持水性能的比较研究[J].水土保持学报,2014,28(1):88-91.
韩路,王海珍,吕瑞恒,等.塔里木河上游不同森林类型枯落物的持水特性[J].水土保持学报,2014,28(1):96-101.
孟宪宇.测树学[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1996.
常龙芳,史正涛,曾建军,等.滇中城市水源地森林枯落物及土壤持水特性[J].城市环境与城市生态,2013,26(1):33-36.
0
浏览量
1043
下载量
7
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621