1. 西北农林科技大学 资源环境学院 黄土高原土壤侵蚀与旱地农业国家重点实验室, 陕西 杨凌,712100
2. 西北农林科技大学水土保持研究所, 陕西杨凌,712100
纸质出版:2016
移动端阅览
边锋, 郑粉莉, 徐锡蒙, 等. 东北黑土区顺坡垄作和无垄作坡面侵蚀过程对比[J]. 水土保持通报, 2016,36(1):11-16.
BIAN Feng, ZHENG Fenli, XU Ximeng, et al. Comparison of Soil Erosion Process Between Longitudinal Ridge Slope and Non-ridge Slope in Mollisol Region of Northeast China[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2016, 36(1): 11-16.
边锋, 郑粉莉, 徐锡蒙, 等. 东北黑土区顺坡垄作和无垄作坡面侵蚀过程对比[J]. 水土保持通报, 2016,36(1):11-16. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2016.01.003.
BIAN Feng, ZHENG Fenli, XU Ximeng, et al. Comparison of Soil Erosion Process Between Longitudinal Ridge Slope and Non-ridge Slope in Mollisol Region of Northeast China[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2016, 36(1): 11-16. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2016.01.003.
[目的] 以无垄作坡面侵蚀过程为对照
研究顺坡垄作坡面土壤侵蚀过程及机理
为东北黑土区坡耕地土壤侵蚀防治提供科学依据. [方法] 基于人工模拟降雨试验
设计了3个降雨强度(50
75和100 mm/h)以及1个坡度(即顺坡垄作改横坡垄作的临界坡度5°)
进行顺坡垄作和无垄作坡面侵蚀过程的对比研究. [结果] 顺坡垄作坡面径流量和侵蚀量分别较无垄作坡面增加了1.2~1.7和1.3~2.1倍
径流和侵蚀过程也发生了变化.与无垄作坡面相比
顺坡垄沟的集中汇流作用使坡面水流流速增加了1.0~2.3倍
径流剪切力增加了0.7~1.2倍
其坡面侵蚀方式也由片蚀为主转变为以细沟侵蚀为主
细沟侵蚀量可占总侵蚀量的55.3%~65.6%. [结论] 坡面水流流速增加和细沟侵蚀发生是导致顺坡垄作坡面土壤侵蚀增加的主要原因.
[Objective] Longitudinal ridge slope soil erosion process was studied by using non-rige slope as control in order to provide scientific basis for the prevention and control of soil erosion in the northeast mollisol region slope. [Methods] Simulated rainfall experiments were conducted. The experimental treatments included two tillage measures (longitudinal ridge and non-ridge tillage)
three rainfall intensities (50
75 and 100 mm/h) and one slope gradient (5°
which was the critical slope gradient for changing longitudinal ridge to contour cultivation). [Results] Compared with non-ridge tillage
the total runoff rate and total erosion amount of the longitudinal ridge tillage increased by 1.2~1.7 times and 1.3~2.1 times
respectively. The runoff and sediment process also changed. Compared with non-ridge treatment
the concentrated runoff velocity in furrows of the longitudinal ridge increased by 1.0~2.3 times and shear strength increased by 0.7~1.2 times. Consequently
hillslope erosion pattern shifted from sheet erosion dominant to rill erosion dominant
and rill erosion occupied 55.3%~65.6% of total erosion amount at longitudinal ridge treatments. [Conclusion] The increase of runoff velocity and occurrence of rill erosion were two main reasons for the intensification of hillslope erosion at the longitudinal ridge treatment.
王鸿斌,赵兰波,王杰,等.松辽平原玉米连作黑土不同耕作制度下土壤侵蚀特征研究[J].水土保持学报,2005,19(2):26-28.
霍军力,王永成,董斌.东北黑土区坡耕地地表径流的影响因素分析:兼谈水土流失对策[J].黑龙江水利科技,2008,5(36):93-94.
蔡强国,马紹嘉,吴淑安,等.横厢耕作措施对红壤坡耕地水土保持影响的试验研究[J].水土保持通报,1994,14(1):49-55.
付斌,胡万里,屈明,等.不同农作措施对云南红壤坡耕地径流调控研究[J].水土保持学报,2009,23(1):17-20.
沈昌蒲,龚振平,温锦涛.横坡垄与顺坡垄的水土流失对比研究[J].水土保持通报,2005,25(4):48-50.
王勇强,王玉宽,傅斌,等.不同耕作方式对紫色土侵蚀的影响[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(3):333-335.
辛艳,王瑄,邱野,等.坡耕地不同耕作模式下土壤养分流失特征研究[J].沈阳农业大学学报,2012,43(3):346-350.
赵玉明,刘宝元,姜洪涛.东北黑土区垄向的分布及其对土壤侵蚀的影响[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(5):1-6.
张宪奎,许靖华,卢秀琴,等.黑龙江省土壤流失方程的研究[J].水土保持通报,1992,12(4):1-9.
王玉玺,解运杰,王萍.东北黑土区水土流失成因分析[J].水土保持科技情报,2002(3):27-29.
周佩华,张学栋,唐克丽.黄土高原土壤侵蚀与旱地农业国家重点实验室土壤侵蚀模拟试验大厅降雨装置[J].水土保持通报,2000,20(4):27-30.
高峰,詹敏,战辉.黑土区农地侵蚀性降雨标准研究[J].中国水土保持,1989(11):21-23.
陈雪,蔡强国,王学强.典型黑土区坡耕地水土保持措施适宜性分析[J].中国水土保持科学,2008,6(5):44-49.
水利部,中国科学院,中国工程院.中国水土流失防治与生态安全:东北黑土区卷[M].北京:科学出版社,2010:64-66.
宋玥,张忠学.不同耕作措施对黑土坡耕地土壤侵蚀的影响[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(2):14-16.
肖培青,姚文艺,申震洲,等.草被覆盖下坡面径流入渗过程及水力学参数特征试验研究[J].水土保持学报,2009,23(4):50-53.
Giménez R, Govers G. Interaction between bed roughness and flow hydraulics in eroding rills[J]. Water Resources Research,2001,37(3):791-799.
Guo Tailong, Wang Quanjun, Li Dingqiang, et al. Flow hydraulic characteristic effect on sediment and solute transport on slope erosion[J]. Catena,2013(107):145-153.
李君兰,蔡强国,孙莉英.坡面水流速度与坡面含沙量的关系[J].农业工程学报,2011,27(3):73-78.
0
浏览量
1622
下载量
18
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621