1. 湖南科技大学 建筑与城乡规划学院,湖南,湘潭,411201
2. 湖南科技大学 商学院,湖南,湘潭,411201
纸质出版:2015
移动端阅览
余光辉, 陈莉丽, 田银华, 等. 基于排污权交易的湘江流域生态补偿研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2015,35(5):159-163.
YU Guanghui, CHEN Lili, TIAN Yinhua, et al. Quantitative Study on Ecological Compensation in Xiangjiang River Basin Based on Pollution Rights Trading[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2015, 35(5): 159-163.
余光辉, 陈莉丽, 田银华, 等. 基于排污权交易的湘江流域生态补偿研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2015,35(5):159-163. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20150911.001.
YU Guanghui, CHEN Lili, TIAN Yinhua, et al. Quantitative Study on Ecological Compensation in Xiangjiang River Basin Based on Pollution Rights Trading[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2015, 35(5): 159-163. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20150911.001.
[目的] 以湖南省湘江流域为研究对象
探索流域生态补偿方法
为湘江流域实施污染综合治理及区域平衡发展提供理论依据。[方法] 通过研究区域内的8个城市(长沙、湘潭、株洲、衡阳、岳阳、永州、郴州、娄底)2012年的人均GDP
人口总数
人均工业生产总值和万元GDP污水排放量与8个市的平均值进行对比分析
确定生态补偿标准系数。通过将各个市的人均排污量与8个城市的平均排污量作比较
求得各个市的超量排污量和节余排污量;按照主要因子排污价格及其排污比例确定超量排放和节余排放的支付和补偿价格;利用生态补偿标准系数
计算2012年湘江流域每个城市的最终补偿标准。[结果] 2012年长沙、株洲、湘潭市应分别支付生态补偿资金4005.0
440.7和430.1万元
衡阳、岳阳、郴州、永州和娄底市可获得的生态补偿资金分别为338.2
90.4
561.4
602.8和379.5万元。[结论] 实际排污大于理论排污权的城市有长沙、株洲和湘潭市;而其他5个城市排污权均有节余。
[Objective] Taking Xiangjiang river basin in Hunan Province as the research object
we studied the compensation for watershed ecology
in order to provide the theory basis for pollution comprehensive treatment and regional balanced development in Xiangjiang River basin.[Methods] The standard coefficient of ecological compensation was determined by comparing the value of 2012 GDP per capita
the total population
the per capita gross industrial production value and the discharging quantity of sewage per ten thousand yuan GDP with the average value in eight cities(Changsha
Xiangtan
Zhuzhou
Hengyang
Yueyang
Yongzhou
Chenzhou and Loudi). The excessive and unused quantity of sewerage drainage was calculated by the differences between per capita value of each city with the average values. The compensation price was determined according to the proportion of main factors price and the sewerage drainage in each city. The ultimate standard of compensation was considered according to the ecological compensation standard coefficient in Xiangjiang river basin.[Results] The ecological compensation funds for Changsha
Zhuzhou
Xiangtan
Hengyang
Yueyang
Chengzhou
Yongzhou and Loudi City was 40.050
4.407
4.301
3.382
0.904
5.614
6.028 and 3.795 million yuan
respectively.[Conclusion] Quantity of sewerage drainage in Changsha
Zhuzhou and Xiangtan City are more than the theory emission permits
while the actual sewerage drainage in other 5 cities were less than the permits.
许振成,叶玉香,彭晓春,等.流域水质资源有偿使用机制的思考:以东江为例[J].长江流域资源与环境,2007,16(5):598-602.
Austen E J, Hanson A. Identifying wetland compensation principles and mechanisms for Atlantic Canada using a Delphi approach[J]. Wetlands, 2008,28(3):640-655.
Rubec C D A, Hanson A R. Wetland mitigation and compensation:Canadian experience[J]. Wetlands Ecology and Management, 2009,17(1):3-14.
赵春光.流域生态补偿制度的理论基础[J].法学论坛,2008,23(4):90-96.
俞海,任勇.流域生态补偿的关键问题分析:以南水北调中线水源涵养区为例[J].资源科学,2007,29(2):28-33.
李磊.我国流域生态补偿机制探讨[J].软科学,2007,93(3):85-87.
赵光洲,陈妍竹.我国流域生态补偿机制探讨[J].经济问题探索,2010(1):6-11.
周大杰,桑燕鸿,李慧民,等.流域水资源生态补偿标准初探:以官厅水库流域为例[J].河北农业大学学报,2009,32(1):10-13.
乔旭宁,杨永菊,杨德刚,等.流域生态补偿标准的确定:以渭干河流域为例[J].自然资源学报,2012,27(10):1666-1676.
刘涛,吴钢,付晓.经济学视角下的流域生态补偿制度:基于一个污染赔偿的算例[J].生态学报,2012,32(10):2985-2991.
郭志建,葛颜祥,范方玉.基于水质和水量的流域逐级补偿制度研究:以大汉河流域为例[J].中国农业资源与区划,2013,3(1)96-102.
吕志贤,李佳喜.构建湘江流域生态补偿机制的探讨[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2011,21(3):455-458.
吕志贤,李元钊,李佳喜.湘江流域生态补偿系数定量分析[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2011,21(3):451-454.
孔凡斌,廖文梅.基于排污权的鄱阳湖流域生态补偿标准研究[J].江西财经大学学报,2013,88(4):12-19.
吕殿青,欧阳峣.湘江流域生态环境状况的分析评价[J].湖南商学院学报,2011,18(5):55-60.
湖南省环境状况公报[R].长沙:湖南省环境保护厅,2012.
顾开运.湘江流域水污染物排污权交易制度的研究与设计[D].长沙:中南大学,2009.
钱水苗,范莉.钱塘江流域生态补偿机制构想[C]//水资源可持续利用与水生态环境保护的法律问题研究.2008年全国环境资源法学研讨会.南京,2008:279-282.
0
浏览量
1299
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621