陕北生态脆弱区农民环境感知状况及其影响因素

郭玲霞; 封建民; 孙铂

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20150902.001

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

陕北生态脆弱区农民环境感知状况及其影响因素

试验研究

- 陕北生态脆弱区农民环境感知状况及其影响因素
- Environmental Perception of Farmers and Its Influence Factors in Ecological Fragile Area of Northern Shaanxi Province
- 水土保持通报 2015年35卷第4期页码：235-241
- 作者机构：
  
  咸阳师范学院旅游与资源环境学院,陕西,咸阳,712000
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  国家社会科学基金项目"民国时期西北地区新式交通与社会变迁研究"(10XZS013);陕西省教育厅专项科研计划项目(14JK1800);陕西省普通高校优势学科建设项目(0602);黄土与第四纪地质国家重点实验室开放基金(SKLLQG1316);咸阳师范学院"青蓝人才"计划项目
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20150902.001
  中图分类号：
- 纸质出版：2015
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
郭玲霞, 封建民, 孙铂. 陕北生态脆弱区农民环境感知状况及其影响因素[J]. 水土保持通报, 2015,35(4):235-241.

GUO Lingxia, FENG Jianmin, SUN Bo. Environmental Perception of Farmers and Its Influence Factors in Ecological Fragile Area of Northern Shaanxi Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2015, 35(4): 235-241.
郭玲霞, 封建民, 孙铂. 陕北生态脆弱区农民环境感知状况及其影响因素[J]. 水土保持通报, 2015,35(4):235-241. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20150902.001.

GUO Lingxia, FENG Jianmin, SUN Bo. Environmental Perception of Farmers and Its Influence Factors in Ecological Fragile Area of Northern Shaanxi Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2015, 35(4): 235-241. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20150902.001.

摘要

[目的] 分析陕北生态脆弱区农民环境感知状况及影响因素

为促进农民参与生态环境保护

解决生态脆弱区生态环境退化问题提供借鉴和参考。[方法] 对榆林市靖边县288户农户进行参与式调查

通过建立结构方程模型分析陕北生态脆弱区农民环境感知及其影响因素。[结果] 3个内生变量之间存在显著且重要的路径关系。感知对意识的路径系数为0.50(t=3.31)

感知对行为的路径系数为0.59(t=3.35)

意识对行为的路径系数为0.59(t=2.82)。[结论] 农民对于区域环境变化的感知度较高

满意程度较低

农民的居住时间、受教育程度、社会资本和人力资本是影响其环境感知、意识和行为的主要因素。

Abstract

[Objective] Farmers' environmental awareness and influence factors in the ecological fragile areas of Northern Shaanxi Province were analyzed in order to promote farmers to participate in ecological environment protection and to provide a support for solving the ecological degradation problem of ecological fragile areas. [Methods] Data of livelihood capital from 288 households were collected in interviewing with farmers. Their environmental perception and the possible influence factors were analyzed using the structure equation model(SEM). [Results] The 3 endogenous variables used in the models had significant path coefficients. The path coefficient from awareness to consciousness was 0.50(t=3.31)

from perception to behavior was 0.59(t=3.35)

from consciousness to behavior was 0.59(t=2.82). [Conclusion] Farmers' perception of environmental change is high

while their satisfaction at regional environmental conditions is low. Residence time

education level

social capital and human capital were the main factors that can influence farmers' perception

awareness and behavior of environment.

关键词

Keywords

references

Darren R, Sharon L H, Susanne G C, et al. Scales of perception:public awareness of regional and neighborhood climates[J]. Climatic Change, 2012,111(3):581-607.

Dunlap R E, McCright A M. A widening gap:Republican and democratic views on climate change[J]. Environment, 2008,50(4):26-35.

Krosnick J A, Holbrook A L, Lowe L, et al. The origins and consequences of democratic citizens' policy agendas:A study of popular concern about global warming[J]. Climatic Change, 2006,77(2):7-43.

王媛,方修琦,田青,等.气候变暖及人类适应行为对农作物总产变化的影响[J].自然资源学报,2006,16(12):1645-1650.

周旗,郁耀闯.关中地区公众气候变化感知的时空变异[J].地理研究,2009,28(1):45-54.

Jamie Z, Jennie L H, Karen Z, et al. Environmental perceptions and objective walking trail audits inform a community-based participatory research walking intervention[J]. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 2012, 9(1):6-13.

Flynn J, Slovic P, Mertz C K. Gender, race, and perception of environmental health risks[J]. Risk Anayisis, 2006,14(6):1101-1108.

Kaátia R, Katherine P, Maica R S, et al. Perception of environmental problems and common mental disorders[J]. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiol, 2012,47(10):1675-1684.

赵雪雁.不同生计方式农户的环境感知[J].生态学报,2012,32(21):6776-6787.

史兴民,廖文果.陕西省铜川矿区居民对环境问题的感知[J].地理科学,2012,32(9):1087-1092.

Shi Xingmin, He Fei. The environmental pollution perception of residents in coal mining areas:A case study in the Hancheng mine area, Shaanxi Province, China[J]. Environmental Management, 2012,50(6):505-513.

Engel U, Potshke M. Willingness to pay for the environment:Social structure, value orientations and environmental behavior in a multi-level perspective[J]. The European Journal of Social Sciences, 1998,11(3):315-332.

Thomas D S G, Sporton D. Understanding the dynamics of social and environmental variability:The impacts of structural land use change on the environment and peoples of the Kalahari, Botswana[J]. Applied Geography, 1997,17(4):11-27.

Hines J M, Hungerford H R, Tomera A N. Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior:A meta-analysis[J]. Journal of Environmental Education, 1987,18(2):1-8.

Franz X B. The influence of a residential outdoor education programme to pupil's environmental perception[J]. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 2002,17(1):19-34.

彭建,周尚意.公众环境感知与建立环境意识[J].人文地理,2001,16(3):21-25.

阎建忠,吴莹莹,张镱锂,等.青藏高原东部样带农牧民生计的多样化[J].地理学报,2009,64(2):2321-2331.

苏芳,尚海洋.农户生计资本对其风险应对策略的影响[J].中国农村经济,2012(8):79-96.

侯杰泰,温忠麟,成子娟.结构方程模型及其应用[M].北京:教育科学出版社,2004:27-116.

浏览量

1235

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

浅析我国现阶段“三农”问题与农村水土保持的关系

退耕还林对农户可持续生计的影响——河北省以保定市涞水县为例

自然保护区居民生计资本与生计策略

基于农民满意度的农村水环境治理绩效研究——以湖北省部分县市的调查为例

石漠化地区农户生计资本与生计策略的关系——以贵州省关岭贞丰花江石漠化综合示范区为例