山西大学 环境与资源学院,山西,太原,030006
纸质出版:2015
移动端阅览
申小雨, 张红, 张艳灵, 等. 汾河水库周边土壤氮流失风险评价[J]. 水土保持通报, 2015,35(6):248-254.
SHEN Xiaoyu, ZHANG Hong, ZHANG Yanling, et al. Risk Assessment of Soil Nitrogen Loss Around Fenhe Reservoir[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2015, 35(6): 248-254.
申小雨, 张红, 张艳灵, 等. 汾河水库周边土壤氮流失风险评价[J]. 水土保持通报, 2015,35(6):248-254. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2015.06.044.
SHEN Xiaoyu, ZHANG Hong, ZHANG Yanling, et al. Risk Assessment of Soil Nitrogen Loss Around Fenhe Reservoir[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2015, 35(6): 248-254. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2015.06.044.
[目的] 对汾河水库周边土壤氮流失风险进行评价
为汾河水库周边的环境管理与污染控制提供依据。[方法] 在对汾河水库周边土壤采样、全氮含量测定的基础上
结合研究区地形、降雨、土地利用类型、径流、化肥施用、人口、潜在污染源距离等因子
采用通用水土流失方程和氮指数评价法进行评价。[结果] 从研究区整体来看
土壤氮流失风险水平并不高
风险评价等级为低、中、高、极高程度的面积分别占研究区总面积的78.04%
2.72%
9.31%和9.93%;从空间上来看
氮流失风险较高的区域主要集中分布在研究区的西南和东北部
土地利用类型主要是地势平坦的耕地。中等流失风险程度的区域大部分位于沿河山地地区
土地利用类型为林地、草地及耕地。低风险程度的区域主要位于河谷地区较为平坦的地区
土地利用类型以草地和耕地为主。[结论] 采用的氮指数评价法综合考虑了土壤氮流失的源因子和迁移因子
可以科学有效地反映研究区土壤氮流失风险的水平及空间分布。
[Objective] The objective of this paper is to evaluate risk of the soil nitrogen loss around the Fenhe Reservoir in order to provide scientific support for the environmental management and pollution control in Fenhe River watershed.[Methods] Soil samples around the Fenhe Reservoir were collected in 2011
and soil total nitrogen contents were determined. Using the factors such as topography
climate
land use type
fertilizer use
population and distance to potential pollution source
we used the nitrogen index evaluation method and revised universal soil loss equation(RUSLE) to evaluate the risk of soil nitrogen loss in the study area.[Results] The risk of soil nitrogen loss is low in the study area. The proportion of low
medium
high and higher risk level is 78.04%
2.72%
9.31% and 9.93%
respectively. The areas with high risk of nitrogen loss are mainly located in the southwest and northeast of the research area
and the land use type is mainly farmland. The medium risk areas are mostly located in mountainous area along the river and the land use types are forest
grassland and farmland. The low risk areas are mainly located in the river valley area and the land use types are grassland and farmland.[Conclusion] Nitrogen index assessment is an effective method to assess the nitrogen loss risk. Using the source and migration factor of soil nitrogen loss together
this study can provided scientific support for environmental management and pollution control for Fenhe Reservoir.
Lemunyon J L, Gilbert R G. The concept and need for a phosphorus assessment tool[J]. Journal of Production Agriculture, 1993,6(4):483-486.
Gburek W J, Sharpley A N, Heathwaite L, et al. Phosphorus management at the watershed scale:A modification of the phosphorus index[J]. Journal of Environmental Quality, 2000(29):130-144.
张淑荣,陈利顶,傅伯杰,等.农业区非点源污染潜在危险性评价:以于桥水库流域磷流失为例[J].第四纪研究,2003,23(3):262-269.
王丽华.密云县境内密云水库上游地区磷流失危险性评价[D].北京:首都师范大学,2006.
王丽华,王晓燕,张志锋,等.磷指数法:PI(P Index)的修正及应用[J].首都师范大学学报:自然科学版,2006,27(2):85-88.
周慧平,高超.巢湖流域非点源磷流失关键源区识别[J].环境科学,2008,29(10):2696-2702.
张平,高阳昕,刘云慧,等.基于氮磷指数的小流域氮磷流失风险评价[J].生态环境学报,2011,20(6):1018-1025.
陈能汪,汪华生,张珞平.流域尺度氮流失的环境风险评价[J].环境科学研究,2006,19(1):10-14.
李如忠,邹阳,徐晶晶,等.瓦埠湖流域庄墓镇农田土壤氮磷分布及流失风险评估[J].环境科学,2013,35(3):1051-1059.
张水龙,庄季屏.农业非点源污染的流域单元划分方法[J].农业环境保护,2001,20(1):34-37.
Wischmeier W H, Smith D D. Predicting Rainfall Erosion Losses:A Guide to Conservation Planning[M] Washington D C:Department of Agriculture, 1978.
张金池,李海东,林杰,等.基于小流域尺度的土壤可蚀性K值空间变异[J].生态学报,2008,28(5):2199-2206.
张艳灵,等.通用土壤流失方程研究进展[J].山西水土保持科技,2013(2):12-15.
陈彦平.汾河水库流域水文特性分析[J].山西水土保持科技,2009(4):23-25.
Bechmann M, Stlnacke P, Kvrn S, et al. Integrated tool for risk assessment in agricultural management of soil erosion and losses of phosphorus and nitrogen[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2009,407(2):749-759.
李琪,陈利顶,齐鑫,等.流域农业非点源污染磷指数评价法研究进展[J].农业环境科学学报,2006,25(S):810-813.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621