堆渣边坡生态棒护坡措施的水土保持效益

田野; 葛德; 杨建英; 冯明明; 林田苗; 安云; 赵广祥

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2015.06.036

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

堆渣边坡生态棒护坡措施的水土保持效益

试验研究

- 堆渣边坡生态棒护坡措施的水土保持效益
- Soil and Water Conservation Benefits of Ecological Rods on Mineral Waste-Piled Slopes
- 水土保持通报 2015年35卷第6期页码：196-201
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 北京林业大学水土保持学院,北京,100083
  2. 云南省交通规划设计研究院,云南,昆明,650011
  3. 水利部水土保持植物开发管理中心,北京,100038
  4. 河北省水利水电勘测设计研究院,天津,300250
  5. 北京市延庆县水保工作站, 北京延庆,102100
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  国家林业公益性项目"建设工程损毁林地植被修复关键技术研究与示范"(200904030);长江科学院开放研究基金项目(CKWV2013203/KY)
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2015.06.036
  中图分类号：
- 纸质出版：2015
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
田野, 葛德, 杨建英, 等. 堆渣边坡生态棒护坡措施的水土保持效益[J]. 水土保持通报, 2015,35(6):196-201.

TIAN Ye, GE De, YANG Jianying, et al. Soil and Water Conservation Benefits of Ecological Rods on Mineral Waste-Piled Slopes[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2015, 35(6): 196-201.
田野, 葛德, 杨建英, 等. 堆渣边坡生态棒护坡措施的水土保持效益[J]. 水土保持通报, 2015,35(6):196-201. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2015.06.036.

TIAN Ye, GE De, YANG Jianying, et al. Soil and Water Conservation Benefits of Ecological Rods on Mineral Waste-Piled Slopes[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2015, 35(6): 196-201. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2015.06.036.

摘要

[目的] 探究堆渣边坡生态棒防护措施的综合防护效果

为露天采石场裸露边坡的生态修复提供依据。[方法] 利用人工降雨模拟试验

收集不同降雨强度下地表层和矿渣层的产流量、产沙量

并建立综合贡献度模型。[结果] 随着坡度的增加地表层的径流总量和泥沙总量呈递增趋势

而矿渣层的径流总量和泥沙总量呈递减趋势

与径流总量相比泥沙总量变化趋势不明显;对照组与生态棒防护措施下

地表层的产流-产沙相关性均高于矿渣层;当降雨强度为30和120 mm/h时

生态棒防护边坡在坡度为15°时具有较佳的防护效果

当降雨强度为60 mm/h时

径流量和泥沙量受坡度变化的影响不显著。[结论] 生态棒防护措施具有拦蓄坡面径流和泥沙的功能

与对照组相比可以更有效地防治坡面水土流失。

Abstract

[Objective] In order to provide some reliable bases for ecological restoration of quarry slopes

the comprehensive effects of ecological rod method on controlling the soil and water loss on slopes were investigated.[Methods] Large-scale artificial rainfall tests were conducted to collect information about the quantities of runoff and sediment from surface layer and debris flow

and upon which a comprehensive model was built.[Results] With the increase of slope degree

the quantities of runoff and sediment from surface increased while that from debris flow decreased. Total sediment did not change as significant as the total runoff did. The correlation of runoff and sediment from surface layer was higher than that from debris flow. Ecological rod protective measures built on <15°slopes had the highest benefits when rainfall intensities were 30 mm/h and 120 mm/h. Slope degree had little influence on runoff and sediment when rainfall intensity was 60 mm/h.[Conclusion] The ecological rod protective measure has significant effects on the control of soil and water loss by intercepting surface runoff and sediment.

关键词

Keywords

references

Zhang H, Song J, Su C, et al. Human attitudes in environmental management:Fuzzy cognitive maps and policy option simulations analysis for a coal-mine ecosystem in China[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2013,115(3):227-234.

Stefánescu L, Robu B M, Ozunu A. Integrated approach of environmental impact and risk assessment of Rosia Montana Mining Area, Romania[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2013,20(11):7719-7727.

Silva E F D, Ávila P F, Salgueiro A R, et al. Quantitative-spatial assessment of soil contamination in S. Francisco de Assis due to mining activity of the Panasqueira mine(Portugal)[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2013,20(11):7534-7549.

Bhebhe D, Kunguma O, Jordaan A, et al. A case study of the perceived socio-environmental problems caused by illegal gold mining in Gwanda District, Zimbabwe[J]. Disaster Advances, 2013,6(10):70-76.

张华,赵廷宁,白麟,等.采石场松散体坡面平铺生态袋绿化的水土保持效应[J].水土保持通报,2013,33(2):111-115.

赵永军.生产建设项目水土流失防治技术综述[J].中国水土保持,2007(4):47-50.

史文娟,马媛,王娟,等.地形因子对陕北坡耕枣树地产流产沙的影响及模拟研究[J].水土保持学报,2014,28(2):25-29.

傅涛,倪九派,魏朝富,等.不同雨强和坡度条件下紫色土养分流失规律研究[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2003,9(1):71-74.

李岩龙.周口店地区基底岩石地质演化史分析[J].西部探矿工程,2011,23(11):159-162.

杨翠霞,赵廷宁,谢宝元,等.基于小流域自然形态的废弃矿区地形重塑模拟[J].农业工程学报,2014,30(1):236-244.

张艳,赵廷宁,史常青,等.北京山区采石场边坡植被恢复动态研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2013,27(6):61-66.

马京津,李书严,王冀.北京市强降雨分区及重现期研究[J].气象,2012,38(5):569-576.

张华.北京房山区黄院采石场松散堆积体生态修复技术研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2013.

王琼.华东地区采石场自然恢复特征及人工生态恢复研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2009.

王琼,辜再元,周连碧.德兴铜矿水龙山酸性废石堆场边坡生态恢复工程模式研究[J].中国矿业,2011,20(1):64-66.

Ibáñez J J, Ruiz-Ramos M. A mathematical comparison of classification structures:The case of the USDA Soil Taxonomy[J]. Eurasian Soil Science, 2006,39(7):712-719.

张守红,刘苏峡,莫兴国,等.降雨和水保措施对无定河流域径流和产沙量影响[J].北京林业大学学报,2010,32(4):161-169.

Balacco G. The interrill erosion for a sandy loam soil[J]. International Journal of Sediment Research, 2013,28(3):329-337.

符素华,路炳军,叶芝菡.地表砾石对降雨径流及土壤侵蚀的影响[J].水土保持学报,2010(2):15-18.

侯立柱,冯绍元,丁跃元,等.人工降雨条件下多层渗滤介质系统产流与入渗规律试验研究[J].农业工程学报,2006,22(9):100-105.

石生新.高强度人工降雨条件下地面坡度,植被坡面产沙过程的影响[J].山西水利科技,1996(3):77-80

王安,郝明德,王荚文.人工降雨条件下秸秆覆盖及留茬的水土保持效应[J].水土保持通报,2012,32(2):26-32.

Donjadee S, Chinnarasri C. Effects of rainfall intensity and slope gradient on the application of vetiver grass mulch in soil and water conservation[J]. International Journal of Sediment Research, 2012,27(2):168-177.

张艳,杨建英,冯明明,等.松散堆积体边坡竹栅栏防护措施的水土保持效益[J].水土保持学报,2014,28(5):1-5.

余新晓,张晓明,武思宏,等.黄土区林草植被与降水对坡面径流和侵蚀产沙的影响[J].山地学报,2006,24(1):19-26.

蒋荣.地形因子对贵州喀斯特地区坡面土壤侵蚀的影响[D].江苏南京:南京大学,2013.

马波,吴发启,李占斌,等.作物与坡度交互作用对坡面径流侵蚀产沙的影响[J].水土保持学报,2013,27(3):33-38.

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

暴雨作用下排土场平台—边坡系统土体养分流失特征

河口镇到龙门区间水土保持措施减沙水代价分析

中国北方地区水土保持措施减沙水代价分析

农林复合措施保土保肥试验分析

鄱阳湖区典型堤防不同植草护坡产流产沙特征试验研究