福州大学 福建省空间信息工程研究中心 数据挖掘与信息共享教育部重点实验室,福建,福州,350003
纸质出版:2015
移动端阅览
梁娟珠. 不同植被措施下红壤坡面径流变化特征[J]. 水土保持通报, 2015,35(6):159-163.
LIANG Juanzhu. Runoff Changes on Slope with Different Vegetation Measures in Red Soil Region[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2015, 35(6): 159-163.
梁娟珠. 不同植被措施下红壤坡面径流变化特征[J]. 水土保持通报, 2015,35(6):159-163. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2015.06.028.
LIANG Juanzhu. Runoff Changes on Slope with Different Vegetation Measures in Red Soil Region[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2015, 35(6): 159-163. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2015.06.028.
[目的] 研究不同植被措施对坡面径流的影响
为南方红壤水土保持与生态恢复实践提供科学依据。[方法] 以福建省长汀县2001-2010年香根草、胡枝子、类芦、百喜草等植被措施下的径流小区逐月径流量和降雨数据为基础进行分析研究。[结果] 植被能很好地调控坡面地表径流
但由于植被的结构、根系以及地表枯落物的差异
各种植被的保水效益存在差异
观测期
各小区年均径流量的大小趋势表现为:空白对照区 >百喜草 >类芦 >香根草 >胡枝子
胡枝子的保水效益最佳。[结论] 香根草、胡枝子、类芦、百喜草等植被均能有效地抑制坡面径流
减少水土流失
均可以作为水土保持措施的优良灌草在南方红壤区进行推广应用
尤其是要加大胡枝子的推广力度。
[Objective] Effects of different vegetation measures on red soil slope runoff were researched to provide a scientific basis for soil and water conservation and ecological restoration in the southern red soil region of China.[Methods] Monthly runoff and rainfall data from plots planted with Vetiver
Lespedeza
Neyraudia
Bahiasgrass during 2001 to 2010 were collected to analyze the above mentioned effects using statistical method. The plots were located at Changting County in Fujian Province.[Results] Vegetation measures could control slope runoff well
but due to the differences among vegetation structure
root and litter amount of the above measures
soil and water conservation benefits from the above measures were different. In the period of observation
the rank of annual runoff was:control plot with no vegetation measure >Bahiagrass >Neyraudia >Vetiver >Lespedeza. Water conservation benefit from Lespedeza measure performed best.[Conclusion] Vetiver
Lespedeza
Neyraudia
Bahiasgrass et al. vegetation could control slope runoff effectively and reduce soil erosion. Therefore
they can all be used as the excellent shrub/grass for soil and water conservation; and can be applied in the red soil region of Southern China
especially Lespedeza measure is recommended.
阮伏水,朱鹤健.福建省花岗岩地区土壤侵蚀与治理[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1997:31-32.
杨学震,钟炳林,谢小东,等.丘陵红壤的土壤侵蚀与治理[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2005:87-95.
王维明,陈明华,林敬兰,等.长汀县水土流失动态变化及防治对策研究[J].水土保持通报,2005,25(4):73-77.
孙佳佳,于东升,史学正,等.植被叶面积指数与覆盖度定量表征红壤区土壤侵蚀关系的对比研究[J].土壤学报,2010,47(6):1060-1066.
史东梅,卢喜平,蒋光毅.紫色丘陵区降雨侵蚀力简易算法的模拟[J].农业工程学报,2010,26(2):116-122.
金平伟,向家平,李万能,等.植被对南方红壤丘陵区土壤侵蚀的影响研究[J].亚热带水土保持,2014(1):1-4.
赵护兵,刘国彬,曹清玉.黄土丘陵区不同植被类型对水土流失的影响[J].水土保持通报,2004,12(2):153-155.
张晓明,余新晓,武思宏,等.黄土区森林植被对坡面径流和侵蚀产沙的影响[J].应用生态学报,2005,16(9):1613-1617.
李钢,梁音,曹龙熹.次生马尾松林下植被恢复措施的水土保持效益[J].中国水土保持科学,2012,6(6):25-31.
韩永刚,王维明,杨玉盛.闽北不同土地利用方式径流量动态变化特征[J].水土保持通报,2006,13(5):262-266.
章俊霞,李小军,左长清.南方红壤入渗影响因素研究[J].中国水土保持,2008(6):27-29.
张展羽,张国华,左长清,等.红壤坡地不同覆盖措施的水土保持效益分析[J].河海大学学报:自然科学版,2007,35(1):1-4.
张成梁,程冬兵,刘士余.红壤坡地果园植草的水土保持效应[J].草地学报,2006,14(4):365-369.
范连玉,孙亚茹,刘凤英.胡枝子营造试验研究及水土保持效益分析[J].黑龙江水专学报,2006,33(3):115-116.
姚环,沈骅,李颢,等.香根草固土护坡工程特性初步研究[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报,2007,18(2):63-68.
尹忠东,丛晓红,李永慈.江西丘陵红壤区坡面径流及其与降雨关系的影响因素[J].水土保持通报,2008,28(4):7-10.
陈鹏飞,陈丽华,王宇,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区不同土地利用类型对坡地产流、产沙的影响[J].生态与农村环境学报,2010,26(3):199-204.
樊登星,余新晓,贾国栋,等.北京山区灌草坡面水土流失特征及其影响因素[J].中国水土保持科学,2014,2(2):24-28.
0
浏览量
1201
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621