等高反坡阶对坡耕地土壤碳库的影响

陈敏全; 王克勤

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2015.06.007

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

等高反坡阶对坡耕地土壤碳库的影响

试验研究

- 等高反坡阶对坡耕地土壤碳库的影响
- Effects of Reverse-slope Level Terrace on Soil Carbon Stock of Sloping Farmland
- 水土保持通报 2015年35卷第6期页码：41-46
- 作者机构：
  
  西南林业大学环境科学与工程学院,云南,昆明,650224
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目"微区域集水系统控制云南山区农业面源污染的机理研究"(30660037);云南省高校优势特色重点学科(生态学)建设项目
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2015.06.007
  中图分类号：
- 纸质出版：2015
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
陈敏全, 王克勤. 等高反坡阶对坡耕地土壤碳库的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2015,35(6):41-46.

CHEN Minquan, WANG Keqin. Effects of Reverse-slope Level Terrace on Soil Carbon Stock of Sloping Farmland[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2015, 35(6): 41-46.
陈敏全, 王克勤. 等高反坡阶对坡耕地土壤碳库的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2015,35(6):41-46. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2015.06.007.

CHEN Minquan, WANG Keqin. Effects of Reverse-slope Level Terrace on Soil Carbon Stock of Sloping Farmland[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2015, 35(6): 41-46. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2015.06.007.

摘要

[目的] 研究坡耕地等高反坡阶措施的蓄水保土和固碳减排效应

为改善云南山区红壤坡耕地土壤侵蚀状况提供科学依据。[方法] 自然降雨条件下

通过松花坝迤者小流域1 a的野外径流小区定位观测

对有、无等高反坡阶措施条件下的坡面产流产沙和土壤有机碳流失进行对比分析。[结果] (1)泥沙作为土壤有机碳流失的重要载体

因其流失所致的流失量占总有机碳流失量的85%以上

最高达95.38%;(2)等高反坡阶具有显著的蓄水减流和保土减沙效应

其减流率在5.56%~53.91%

减沙率在18.84%~83.11%

产沙调控作用更优;(3)雨季前后

原状坡面小区土壤碳储量减少率达9.90%

明显高于等高反坡阶小区土壤碳储量的减少率3.99%;(4)通过相关分析发现

2个小区土壤有机碳的流失率与降雨量均未达到显著相关

但与降雨侵蚀力显著相关(p<0.05)。径流、泥沙与2个小区有机碳的流失率均达到了显著正相关(p<0.05)。[结论] 等高反坡阶通过改变地表微地形

减少了坡耕地有机碳的输出。

Abstract

[Objective] In order to provide a scientific basis for prevention of soil erosion on slope farmlands in mountainous area of Yunnan Province

the effects of reverse-slope level terraces on soil and water conservation and soil carbon stock of slope farmland were studied.[Methods] A comparative experiment was conducted in a fixed 1 year run-off observation plot located in Yizhe watershed of Kunming Songhuaba reservoir under natural rainfall condition. Surface runoff

sediment quantity and the loss of soil organic carbon from slope farmland with and without reverse-slope level terraces(act as control) were measured.[Results] (1) As an important carrier of soil organic carbon

the loss of sediment-bonded soil organic carbon accounted for over 85% of the total organic carbon lost with runoff

and the maximum bonded loss proportion could reach 95.38%.(2) The reverse-slope level terrace performed significant effects on promoting soil and water conservation and on reducing runoff and sediment. The reduction rates of runoff and sediment by the reverse-slope level terrace were 5.56%~53.91% and 18.84%~83.11%

respectively

showing that the sediment reducing effect of reverse-slope level terrace was more prominent than that of carbon reducing effect.(3) The reduction rate of soil carbon storage of slope farmland with reverse-slope level terrace was 3.99% during the rainy season

which was significantly less than that of the control of 9.90% reduction.(4) Correlation analysis by the observations from treatment with reverse-slope level terrace and the control showed that the loss rate of soil organic carbon from slope farmland was not significantly correlated with rainfall

it was significantly correlated with erosion capacity of the rainfall(p<0.05). The runoff and sediment quantities were significantly and positively correlated with the loss rate of soil organic carbon in both of the two observation plots(p<0.05).[Conclusion] Mainly by changing micro-topography of land surface

reverse-slope level terrace had remarkable effect on reducing the output of soil organic carbon from slope farmland.

关键词

Keywords

references

Bertol I, Engel F L, Mafra A L, et al. Phosphorus, potassium and organic carbon concentrations in runoff water and sediments under different soil tillage systems during soybean growth[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2007,94(1):142-150.

Zhang Jianhui, Timothy A, Qunie T, et al. Stocks and dynamics of SOC in relation to soil redistribution by water and tillage erosion[J]. Global Change Biology, 2006,12(10):1834-1841.

Lal R. Soil erosion and the global carbon budget[J]. Environment International, 2003,29(4):437-450.

Lal R. Potential of desertification control to sequester carbon and mitigate the greenhouse effect[J]. Climate Change, 2001,51(1):35-72.

Lal R. World cropland soils as a source or sink for atmospheric carbon[J]. Advances in Agronomy, 2001,71:145-191.

Timmermann A, Oberhuber J, Bacher A, et al. Increased EI Nino frequency in a climate model forced by future greenhouse warming[J]. Nature, 1999,398(6729):694-697.

赵合理,蒋定生,范兴科.不同水土保持措施对坡面降水再分配的影响[J].水土保持研究,1996,3(2):75-83.

王萍,王克勤,李太兴,等.反坡水平阶对坡耕地径流和泥沙的调控作用[J].应用生态学报,2011,22(5):1261-1267.

Wischmeier W H, Smith D D. Predicting rainfall erosion losses a guide to conservation planning with the universal soil loss equation(USLE)[M)]. Washington D C:USDA-ARS, Agricultural Handbook,1978.

郑海金,杨洁,汤崇军,等.不同水土保持耕作措施对径流泥沙与土壤碳库的影响[J].水土保持通报,2011,31(6):1-4,10.

Lal R, Follett R F, Kimle J, et al. Managing U S cropland to sequester carbon in soil[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 1999,54(1):374-381.

章明奎,刘兆云.红壤坡耕地侵蚀过程中土壤有机碳的选择性迁移[J].水土保持学报,2009,23(1):45-49.

方华军,杨学明,张晓平,等.土壤侵蚀对农田中土壤有机碳的影响[J].地理科学进展,2004,23(2):77-87.

李光录,张胜利.黄土高原南部侵蚀对不同土壤颗粒级碳氮分布的影响[J].西北农林科技大学学报:自然科学版,2007,35(8):146-150.

贾松伟,贺秀斌,陈云明,等.黄土丘陵区土壤侵蚀对土壤有机碳流失的影响研究[J].水土保持研究,2004,11(4):88-90.

van Hemelryck H, Firner P, van Oost K, et al. The effect of soil redistribution on soil organic carbon:An experimental study[J]. Biogeosciences, 2010,7(12):3971-3986.

毕银丽,王百群,郭胜利,等.黄土丘陵区坝地系统土壤养分特征及其与侵蚀环境的关系:坝地土壤理化性状及其数值分析[J],土壤侵蚀与水土保持学报,1997,3(3):1-9.

邢鹏远,王克勤,杨绍兵,等.反坡水平阶水土保持效益观测[J].中国水土保持科学,2010,8(2):119-124.

Ojasvi P R, Goyal R K, Gupta J P. The micro-catchment water harvesting technique foe the plantation of jujube(Zizyphus mauritiana)in an agroforestry system under arid conditions[J]. Agricultural Wanter Manfgement,1999,41(3):139-147.

Gupta G N, Limba N K, Mutha S. Growth of Prosopis cineraria on microcathments in an arid region[J]. Annals of Arid Zone, 1999,38(1):37-44.

Davidson E A, Ackermann I L. Changes in soil carbon inventories following cultivation of, previously untilled soils[J]. Biogeochemistry, 1993,20(3):161-193.

张东辉,施明恒,金峰,等.土壤有机碳转化与迁移研究概况[J].土壤,2000,35(6):305-309.

浏览量

1406

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

不同水土保持耕作措施对径流泥沙与土壤碳库的影响

西南高山峡谷区坡耕地水土流失图斑识别及宜治理性评价

黑土坡耕地秸秆还田方式对土壤团聚体稳定性的影响

径流模拟对DEM分辨率的敏感性分析

河口镇到龙门区间水土保持措施减沙水代价分析