1. 南昌工程学院 江西省水文水资源与水环境重点实验室,江西,南昌,330099
2. 南昌市水务局,江西,南昌,330004
纸质出版:2015
移动端阅览
朱丽琴, 黄荣珍, 李凤, 等. 红壤侵蚀地植被恢复后土壤水分特征及其凋落物碳归还模式[J]. 水土保持通报, 2015,35(5):1-6.
ZHU Liqin, HUANG Rongzhen, LI Feng, et al. Soil Moisture Characteristics and Litter Carbon Return Patterns After Vegetation Restoration in Eroded Area of Red Soil[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2015, 35(5): 1-6.
朱丽琴, 黄荣珍, 李凤, 等. 红壤侵蚀地植被恢复后土壤水分特征及其凋落物碳归还模式[J]. 水土保持通报, 2015,35(5):1-6. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2015.05.066.
ZHU Liqin, HUANG Rongzhen, LI Feng, et al. Soil Moisture Characteristics and Litter Carbon Return Patterns After Vegetation Restoration in Eroded Area of Red Soil[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2015, 35(5): 1-6. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2015.05.066.
[目的
]
研究退化恢复地土壤水分物理性质和凋落物碳归还的关系
理解不同植被恢复措施的理水调水功能。[方法
]
采用野外调查与室内分析相结合的方法
研究了南方红壤侵蚀地典型植被恢复模式(柑橘林、封育林、木荷×马尾松林混交林、阔叶林)土壤(0-80 cm土层)水分特征及其凋落物碳归还。[结果
]
(1)不同植被恢复模式土壤含水量随土壤水吸力的增大而减小
其剖面平均含水量在15与2.5 kPa水吸力条件下相比
下降幅度的大小依次为:柑橘林(45.92%) >封育林(45.10%) >木荷×马尾松林混交林(38.79%) >阔叶林(31.20%);(2)土壤含水量随土层深度的增加而降低
各植被恢复模式在不同水吸力条件下底层(60-80 cm)土壤含水量与表层(0-10 cm)的相比
柑橘林的变化幅度为30.11%~9.72%
封育林为31.81%~24.46%
木荷×马尾松林混交林为24.46%~5.49%
阔叶林为8.21%~0.24%;在不同土层或不同水吸力条件下
阔叶林土壤含水量下降的幅度均最小;(3)不同模式凋落物碳归还总量大小依次为:木荷×马尾松林混交林(1915.79 kg/hm
2
) >阔叶林(1414.84 kg/hm
2
) >封育林(1212.32 kg/hm
2
) >柑橘林(633.88 kg/hm
2
)
阔叶林阔叶碳归还量和饱和含水量均大于木荷×马尾松林混交林
阔叶碳归还量和饱和含水量表现出更大的一致性。[结论
]
阔叶林土壤保水持水性能最佳
且阔叶碳归还对土壤饱和含水量的影响大于其他组分。
[Objective] Studying the relationship between soil hydro-physical properties and litter carbon return in restored degraded land is beneficial to understanding the hydrological functions associated with different restoration measures.[Methods] Soil moisture characteristics in different soil layers(0-80 cm) and litter carbon were examined in four typical vegetation types in eroded area of red soil
i.e. Citrus reticulata Banco forest
enclosed forest
Schima superba-Pinus massoniana mixed forest and broad-leaved forest
based on field investigations and laboratory tests.[Results] (1) The soil water content decreased with the increases of soil water suction. The average soil water content with a treatment of 1500 kPa water suction
compared with the treatment of 2.5 kPa water treatment
was reduced more in Citrus reticulata Banco forest[(45.92%) than in other vegetation types(enclosed forest(45.10%)
Schima superba-Pinus massoniana mixed forest(38.79%)
broad-leaved forest(31.20%)].(2) The soil water content decreased with the increases in soil depth. Among different water suction treatments
soil water content in the bottom soil layer(60-80 cm) varied between 30.11% to 9.72% in Citrus reticulata Banco forest
31.81% to 24.46% in enclosed forest
24.46% to 5.49% in Schima superba-Pinus massoniana mixed forest and 8.21% to 0.24% in broad-leaved forest. The reductions in soil water content in broad-leaved forest were smallest among four vegetation types.(3) The total litter carbon significantly varied among four vegetation types
i.e. Schima superba-Pinus massoniana mixed forest(1915.79 kg/hm2) >broad-leaved forest(1414.84 kg/hm2) >forbidden forest(1212.32 kg/hm2) >Citrus reticulata Banco forest(633.88 kg/hm2). The carbon return of broad leaf and saturated water content in broad-leaved forest were larger than those in Schima superba-Pinus massoniana mixed forest
showing greater consistency.[Conclusion] Soil water-preserving and holding capacity in broad-leaved forest is the best. The carbon return of broad leaf had greater impacts on soil water content than other factors.
杨勤业,郑度,吴绍洪.关于中国的亚热带[J].亚热带资源与环境学报,2006,1(1):1-10.
赵其国.闽西南及赣南地区水土流失治理问题的思考与建议[J].中国水土保持,2006(8):1-3.
朱显谟.重建土壤水库是黄土高原治本之道[J].科技与社会,2006,21(4):320-324.
朱金兆,刘建军,朱清科,等.森林凋落物层水文生态功能研究[J].北京林业大学学报,2002,24(5/6):30-34.
潘辉,黄石德,洪伟,等.3种相思人工林凋落物量及其碳归还动态[J].福建林学院学报,2010,30(2):104-108.
刘效东,乔玉娜,周国逸.土壤有机质对土壤水分保持及其有效性的控制作用[J].植物生态学报,2011,35(12):1209-1218.
杨弘,李忠,裴铁瑶,等.长白山北坡阔叶红松林和暗针叶林的土壤水分物理性质[J].应用生态学报,2007,18(2):272-276.
徐敬华,陈云明,邓岚.黄土丘陵半干旱区典型人工林土壤水分特征[J].水土保持通报,2010,30(3):48-52.
方堃,陈效民,张佳宝,等.红壤地区典型农田土壤水力学特性及土壤水库容研究[J].土壤通报,2010,41(1):23-27.
张斌,张桃林.南方东部丘陵区季节性干旱成因及其对策研究[M]//赵其国,王明珠,孙波,等.红壤物质循环及其调控.北京:科学出版社,2002:203-209.
Sauer T J, Cambardella C A, Brandle J R. Soil carbon and tree litter dynamics in a red cedar-scotch pine shelterbelt[J]. Agroforestry Systems, 2007,71(3):163-174.
Ouattara K, Ouattara B, Assa A, et al. Long-term effect of ploughing, and organic matter input on soil moisture characteristics of a Ferric Lixisol in Burkina Faso[J]. Soil & Tillage Research, 2005,88(1):217-224.
Dexter A R, Richard G, Arrouays D, et al, Complexed organic matter controls soil physical properties[J]. Geoderma, 2008,144(3):620-627
Wick A F, Ingram L J, Stahl P D. Aggregate and organic matter dynamics in reclaimed soils as indicated by stable carbon isotopes[J]. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2008,41(2):201-209
McCarthy J F, Ilavsky J, Jastrow J D, et al. Protection of organic carbon in soil microaggregates via restructuring of aggregate porosity and filling of pores with accumulating organic matter[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 2008,72(19):4725-4744
0
浏览量
1268
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621