福建牛姆林自然保护区管理处, 福建 永春,362600
纸质出版:2015
移动端阅览
林明春. 矿山废弃地3种人工植被恢复模式土壤水源涵养特征[J]. 水土保持通报, 2015,35(5):296-301.
LIN Mingchun. Soil Water Conservation Features of Three Types of Artificial Vegetation Restoration in Abandoned Mining Area[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2015, 35(5): 296-301.
林明春. 矿山废弃地3种人工植被恢复模式土壤水源涵养特征[J]. 水土保持通报, 2015,35(5):296-301. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2015.05.055.
LIN Mingchun. Soil Water Conservation Features of Three Types of Artificial Vegetation Restoration in Abandoned Mining Area[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2015, 35(5): 296-301. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2015.05.055.
[目的] 分析评价福建省大田县银顶格矿区三种人工植被恢复类型土壤的水源涵养功能。[方法] 采用土壤入渗率、最大可蓄水量、有效蓄水量和非毛管孔隙等指标进行测定分析。[结果](1)邓恩桉×马尾松类型土壤初渗率、稳渗率和平均入渗率均较快
母质层与淋溶层的初渗率和稳渗率之差均较小
其次为邓恩桉×紫花泡桐类型
马尾松×杉木类型最差;(2)各植被类型各土层入渗率与入渗时间呈显著幂函数关系;(3)邓恩桉×紫花泡桐类型土壤最大可蓄水量、有效蓄水量和非毛管孔隙均较大
邓恩桉×马尾松类型次之
马尾松×杉木类型最差;(4)用主成分法综合评价各植被类型土壤涵养水源能力从高到低依次为:邓恩桉×紫花泡桐类型>邓恩桉×马尾松类型>马尾松×杉木类型。[结论] 邓恩桉×紫花泡桐类型改良矿山废弃地土壤结构效果较好
可在类似地区推广应用。
[Objective] In order to evaluated the soil water conservation features of three artificial vegetation types in Yindingge mining area of Datian County
Fujian Province.[Methods] Four index of infiltration
maximum water-holding capacity
available storage capacity of soil and non-capillary pore were calculated and analyzed.[Results] (1)The maximum value of initial infiltration rate
stable infiltration rate and average infiltration rate appeared in Eucahetus dunnii×Pinus massoniana forest type
meanwhile
the difference of initial infiltration rate and steady infiltration rate in parent material layer and leached layer is smaller
the next was E. dunnii×Paulownia tomentosa forest type
the third was P. massoniana×Cunninghamia lanceolata forest type.(2)The relationship between infiltration rate and infiltration time of all vegetation types was a significantly power regression.(3) The maximum value of maximum water-holding capacity
available storage capacity of soil and non-capillary pore appeared in E. dunnii×P. tomentosa forest type
the next was E. dunnii×P. massoniana forest type
the third was P. massoniana×C. lanceolata forest type.(4) Using principal component analysis method to evaluate the soil water conservation features
the order express E. dunnii×P. tomentosa forest type >E. dunnii×P. massoniana forest type >P. massoniana×C. lanceolata forest type.[Conclusion] The better soil amelioration effects in abandoned mines belonged to E. dunnii×P. tomentosa forest type
it could be applied in the similar area.
彭建,蒋一军,吴健生,等.我国矿山开采的生态环境效应及土地复垦典型技术[J].地理科学进展,2005,24(2):38-48.
吕春娟,白中科,赵景逵,等.矿区土壤侵蚀与水土保持研究进展[J].水土保持学报,2003,17(6):85-88.
李永庚,蒋高明.矿山废弃地生态重建研究进展[J].生态学报, 2004,24(1):95-100.
Conesa H M, Faz A, Arnaldos R. Initial studies for the phytostabilization of a mine tailing from the Cartagena-La Union Mining District[J]. Chemosphere, 2007,66(1):38-44.
Wang S L, Liao W B, Yu F Q, et al. Hyperaccumulation of lead, Zinc, and Cadmium in plants growing on a lead/Zinc outcrop in Yunnan Province, China[J]. Environmental Geology, 2009,58(3):471-476.
Deng H, Ye Z H, Wong M H. Accumulation of lead, zinc, copper and cadmium by 12 wetland plant species thriving in metal-contaminated sites in China[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2004,132(1):29-40
Mendez M O, Maier R M. Phytoremediation of mine tailings in temperate and arid environments[J]. Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology, 2008,7(1):47-59.
王丽,梦丽,张金池,等.不同植被恢复模式下矿区废弃地土壤水分物理性质研究[J].中国水土保持,2010(3):54-58.
Fiala A C S, Garman S L, Gray A N. Comparison of five canopy cover estimation techniques in the western Oregon Cascades[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2006,232(1/2/3):188-197.
朱良君,张光辉,任宗萍,等.4种土壤入渗测定方法的比较[J].水土保持通报,2012,32(6):163-167.
吕刚,吴祥云.土壤入渗特性影响因素研究综述[J].中国农学通报,2008,24(7):494-499.
刘洁,李贤伟,纪中华,等.元谋干热河谷三种植被恢复模式土壤贮水及入渗特性[J].生态学报,2011,31(8):2331-2340.
徐凤兰,魏坦,刘爱琴,等.杉木泡桐混交幼林地土壤的物理性质[J].浙江林学院学报,2000,17(3):285.
钱永平.邓恩桉根系生态学研究[D].福州:福建农林大学,2008.
石培礼,吴波,程根伟,等.长江上游地区主要森林植被类型蓄水能力的初步研究[J].自然资源学报,2004,19(3):351-360.
Yemefack M, Jetten V G, Rossiter D G, Developing a minimum data set for characterizing soil dynamics in shifting cultivation systems[J]. Soil & Tillage Research, 2006,86(1):84-98.
吴玉红,田霄鸿,同延安,等.基于主成分分析的土壤肥力综合指数评价[J].生态学杂志,2010,29(1):173-180.
张志永,张卓文,陈玉生等.5种主要森林类型涵养水源能力比较研究[J].福建林学院学报,2005,25(2):171-175.
陈慈禄.泡桐毛竹混交林混交效果试验研究[J].西南林学院学报,2003,23(2):31-33.
郭培培,江洪,余树全,等.亚热带6种针叶和阔叶树种凋落叶分解比较[J].应用与环境生物学报,2009,15(5):655-659.
潘辉,黄石德,张金文,等.试论福建省桉树人工林的生态问题及其对策[J].中国生态农业学报,2009,17(3):605-609.
黄宇,汪思龙,冯宗炜,等.不同人工林生态系统林地土壤质量评价[J].应用生态学报,2004,15(12):2199-2205.
0
浏览量
1367
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621