1. 重庆师范大学地理与旅游学院,重庆,400047
2. 贵州师范大学地理与环境科学学院,贵州,贵阳,550001
3. 新疆昌吉州第二中学,新疆,昌吉,831100
纸质出版:2015
移动端阅览
李潇然, 李阳兵, 韩芳芳. 基于土地利用的三峡库区生态屏障带生态风险评价[J]. 水土保持通报, 2015,35(4):188-194.
LI Xiaoran, LI Yangbing, HAN Fangfang. Ecological Risk Assessment of Ecological Barrier Belt in Three Gorges Reservoir Area Based on Land Use[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2015, 35(4): 188-194.
李潇然, 李阳兵, 韩芳芳. 基于土地利用的三峡库区生态屏障带生态风险评价[J]. 水土保持通报, 2015,35(4):188-194. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2015.04.057.
LI Xiaoran, LI Yangbing, HAN Fangfang. Ecological Risk Assessment of Ecological Barrier Belt in Three Gorges Reservoir Area Based on Land Use[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2015, 35(4): 188-194. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2015.04.057.
[目的] 揭示三峡库区生态屏障带生态风险
为库区生态风险评估及土地利用优化提供理论依据。[方法] 基于遥感影像数据
运用RS与GIS技术
计算土地利用相对合理性指数
同时构建生态风险评价模型
划分高程/坡度带定量评价三峡库区生态屏障带的生态风险情况
划分生态风险等级
并对生态风险进行空间自相关分析。[结果] 较低生态风险区占比例最大
为36.77%
高生态风险区及较高生态风险区主要分布在沿长江两岸建设用地及耕地较为集中的区域
土地利用相对合理性指数随高程增高逐渐变大
随坡度增大逐渐减小
研究区生态风险空间自相关分析呈现出十分显著的局部自相关性。[结论] 研究区内生态风险总体呈现较低值
沿江高值区需对土地利用进行重点优化。
[Objective] The purpose of the ecological risk assessment of the ecological barrier belt in Three Gorges Reservoir area was to provide a reasonable theoretical basis for ecological risk management and land use optimization of the reservoir area. [Methods] Based on remote sensing data
using RS and GIS technology
the land use relative rationality index was calculated and the ecological risk assessment model was built so as to evaluate the ecological risk of ecological barrier belt located in different altitude and slope quantificationally according to the ecological risk levels and spatial autocorrelation analysis. [Results] The results showed that the proportion of lower ecological risk area was maximum
covering an area of 36.77% of the total study area. Area assessed with great or more ecological risk distribute in both sides of the Yangtze River
where construction lands and farmlands are concentrated. The relative rationality index of land use increased gradually with the increase of elevation
decreased when slope gradient increases. The spatial autocorrelation analysis of ecological risk indicated that there was a significant partial correlation in the study area. [Conclusion] The ecological risk in the research area is generally at a low level
but optimization of land use in the areas with high risk still needs to be done preferentially.
蔡明孙,沈世生.抓封山育林,筑生态屏障[J].福建水土保持,1999,11(4):33-34.
王玉宽,孙雪峰,邓玉林,等.对生态屏障概念内涵与价值的认识[J].山地学报,2005,23(5):431-436.
陈国阶.对建设长江上游生态屏障的探讨[J].山地学报,2002,20(5):536-541.
潘开文,吴宁,潘开忠,等.关于建设长江上游生态屏障的若干问题的讨论[J].生态学报,2004,24(3):617-629.
胡友兵,李致家,冯杰,等.三峡库区生态屏障范围界定[J].水利学报,2012,43(10):1248-1253.
周启刚,张叶,杨霏,等.三峡库区生态屏障带划分与土地利用现状研究:以重庆市万州区为例[J].重庆工商大学学报:自然科学版,2012,29(11):65-72.
王丽婧,席春燕,付青,等.基于景观格局的三峡库区生态脆弱性评价[J].环境科学研究,2010,23(10):1268-1273.
毛华平,杨兰蓉,许人骥,等.三峡水库库周生态屏障建设对策研究[J].水土保持学报,2014,28(1):63-72.
杨馨越,魏朝富,倪九派.三峡生态屏障区耕地承载力与人口生态转移[J].中国生态农业学报,2012,20(11):1554-1562.
朱涛,方朝阳,马静洲.三峡生态屏障区居民点建设研究[J].中国农村水利水电,2010(4):23-25,29.
冯琳,徐建英,邸敬涵.三峡生态屏障区农户退耕受偿意愿的调查分析[J].中国环境科学,2013,33(5):938-944.
Wu Qiong, Li Hongqing, Wang Rusong, et al. Monitoring and predicting land use change in Beijing using remote sensing and GIS[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2006,78(4):322-333.
孙才志,闫晓璐,钟敬秋.下辽河平原景观格局脆弱性及空间关联格局[J].生态学报,2014,34(2):247-257.
谢花林.基于景观结构和空间统计学的区域生态风险分析[J].生态学报,2008,28(10):5020-5026.
陈利顶,傅伯杰,王军.黄土丘陵区典型小流域土地利用变化研究:以陕西延安地区大南沟流域为例[J].地理科学,2001, 21(1):46-51.
周廷刚,罗红霞,黎雯.基于GIS的岩溶煤矿区土地利用适宜性评价研究:以重庆市南桐矿区为例[J].中国岩溶,2007,26(2):149-154.
陈利顶,刘洋,吕一河,等.景观生态学中的格局分析:现状、困境与未来[J].生态学报,2008,28(11):5521-5531.
陈彦光.基于Moran统计量的空间自相关理论发展和方法改进[J].地理研究,2009,28(6):1449-1463.
许研,高俊峰,赵家虎,等.流域生态风险评估研究进展[J].生态学报,2012,32(1):284-292.
李博,石培基,金淑婷.石羊河流域植被生态系统生态风险评价研究[J].水土保持通报,2013,33(1):201-205.
刘引鸽.基于土地利用的陕西省生态风险分析[J].水土保持通报,2011,31(3):180-189.
刘晓.基于3S技术三峡库区生态风险评价及管理研究[D].重庆:重庆师范大学,2009.
0
浏览量
1569
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621