北京林业大学水土保持学院,北京,100083
纸质出版:2015
移动端阅览
果超, 孙保平, 方思超, 等. 儋州市退耕还林工程生态效益评价[J]. 水土保持通报, 2015,35(4):308-313.
GUO Chao, SUN Baoping, FANG Sichao, et al. Evaluation on Ecological Benefit of Returning Farmland to Forestland Projects in Danzhou City[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2015, 35(4): 308-313.
果超, 孙保平, 方思超, 等. 儋州市退耕还林工程生态效益评价[J]. 水土保持通报, 2015,35(4):308-313. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2015.04.054.
GUO Chao, SUN Baoping, FANG Sichao, et al. Evaluation on Ecological Benefit of Returning Farmland to Forestland Projects in Danzhou City[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2015, 35(4): 308-313. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2015.04.054.
[目的] 对海南省儋州市退耕还林工程生态效益进行评价
为我国退耕还林工程生态效益评价提供依据。[方法] 以截止2012年儋州市退耕还林工程取得的成绩为基础
对儋州市退耕还林工程林草植被的涵养水源、保育水土、固碳制氧、净化环境、改善小气候和保护生物多样性这6个方面效益进行评价
采用影子工程法、市场价格法进行物质量、价值量的测评
对该地区近9 a来的退耕还林生态效益进行评价分析
结合恩格尔系数与皮尔曲线对评价结果进行修正。[结果] 截止2012年
儋州市退耕还林工程生态效益总价值达22.18亿元
保护水资源价值最大
为17.64亿元
占生态总价值的79.5%;固碳制氧价值次之
为2.38亿元
占生态总价值的10.7%。[结论] 儋州市退耕还林工程在水土保持中发挥极为重要的作用
有效地遏制了当地的水土流失。
[Objective] The ecological benefit of returning farmland to forestry projects in Danzhou City
Hainan Pvovince was to evaluated in order to provide a basis for eco-benefit assessment of returning farmland to forestland project in China. [Methods] Based on the achievements of returning farmland to forestland project in Danzhou City that finished in 2012
the following six aspects of the water conservation
soil and water conservation
carbon sequestration oxygen
purifying environment
improving the microclimate and protecting the biodiversity of Danzhou City project on returning farmland to forest vegetation were evaluated. The shadow engineering method and the market price method were used to carry on the physical and value assessment
analyze the forest ecological benefit of returning farmland in nearly nine years
and combine the Engel coefficient with the Pearson curve together to modify the evaluation results. [Results] By 2012
the ecological value of returning farmland to forestland project of Danzhou City was up to 2.22 billion yuan. The most important value is protection of water resources
1.76 billion yuan
accounting for 79.5% of total ecological value. The following is carbon sequestration oxygen
238 million yuan
accounting for 10.7% of total ecological value. [Conclusion] The ecological benefit brought by the implementation of returning farmland to forestland project of Danzhou City is very significant
and effectively control soil and water loss in Danzhou City.
杨会侠,张景根,张雨鹏,等.不同退耕还林模式对地表径流及土壤物理性状影响的研究[J].吉林林业科技,2007,36(4):29-33.
郭建英.吴起县退耕还林工程效益的监测与评价研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2009.
李生,张守攻,姚小华,等.黔中石漠化地区不同土地利用方式对土壤环境的影响[J].长江流域资源与环境,2008,17(3):384-389.
朗奎建,李常胜,殷有,等.林业生态工程10种生态效益计量理论和方法[J].东北林业大学学报,2000,28(1):1-7.
侯元兆,李玉敏,朱小龙,等.中国的森林服务市场:现状、潜力与问题[J].世界林业研究,2008,21(1):56-60.
侯元兆,王琦.中国森林资源核算研究[J].世界林业研究,1995, 3(1):51-56.
米锋,李吉跃,杨家伟.森林生态效益评价的研究进展[J].北京林业大学学报,2003,25(6):77-83.
杨建波,王利.退耕还林生态效益评价方法[J].中国土地科学,2003,11(5):54-58.
刘珉.海南岛橡胶林水分循环的特征研究[D].海南海口:海南大学.2012.
韩美清,王路光,韩灵灵,等.基于影子工程法和影子价格法的河北水环境污染经济损失研究[J].中国水运,2009,2(9):76-78.
周冰冰,李忠魁.北京市森林资源价值[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2000.
金羽,欧阳志云,林顺坤.海南省绿色GDP核算框架的初步研究[J].绿色经济,2004(3):48-53,64.
王引乾.贵州黎平县退耕还林生态效益及其量化评价研究[D]:北京:北京林业大学,2012.
中国生物多样性国情研究报告编写组.中国生物多样性国情研究报告[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,1998.
张景哲,刘启明.北京城市气温与下垫面结构关系的时相变化[J].地理学报,1988,43(2):159-168.
汪俊三,蔡信德,张更生.中国典型生态区生态破坏经济损失分析和分区[J].环境科学,1996,17(6):5-8.
张永利.中国森林生态系统服务功能研究[M].北京:科学出版社,2010.
0
浏览量
1325
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621