基于小班水平的东洞庭湖区域马尾松林健康评价

陈望雄; 杨新荣; 黎振强; 施和平

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2015.04.035

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

基于小班水平的东洞庭湖区域马尾松林健康评价

试验研究

- 基于小班水平的东洞庭湖区域马尾松林健康评价
- Health Assessment of Masson Pine Forest Based on Sublot Level in East Dongting Lake Area
- 水土保持通报 2015年35卷第4期页码：176-181
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 湖南理工学院经济与管理学院,湖南,岳阳,414000
  2. 景德镇学院经济与管理系,江西,景德镇,333000
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目"基于湿地保护的生态农业体系构建及其运行机制研究:以洞庭湖区为例"(71173073);湖南省教育厅科学研究一般项目"东洞庭湖区域森林健康评价与资源可持续利用机制研究"(14C0519)
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2015.04.035
  中图分类号：
- 纸质出版：2015
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
陈望雄, 杨新荣, 黎振强, 等. 基于小班水平的东洞庭湖区域马尾松林健康评价[J]. 水土保持通报, 2015,35(4):176-181.

CHEN Wangxiong, YANG Xinrong, LI Zhenqiang, et al. Health Assessment of Masson Pine Forest Based on Sublot Level in East Dongting Lake Area[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2015, 35(4): 176-181.
陈望雄, 杨新荣, 黎振强, 等. 基于小班水平的东洞庭湖区域马尾松林健康评价[J]. 水土保持通报, 2015,35(4):176-181. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2015.04.035.

CHEN Wangxiong, YANG Xinrong, LI Zhenqiang, et al. Health Assessment of Masson Pine Forest Based on Sublot Level in East Dongting Lake Area[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2015, 35(4): 176-181. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2015.04.035.

摘要

[目的] 对东洞庭湖区域的优势树种马尾松林进行健康评价研究

为该区域科学经营森林

改善区域人居环境和生态环境建设提供参考和借鉴。[方法] 依据马尾松林样地调查、岳阳市森林资源二类调查和湖南省林业资源信息系统获取马尾松林数据。并从生产力、结构性、可持续性及抗干扰性4个方面选择了马尾松林14个健康评价指标

依据方差贡献率确定指标权重

计算有代表性的329个马尾松林小班得分与既有的健康等级定性指标标准比较确定小班的健康状况。[结果] 优质小班14个

健康小班76个

亚健康小班221个

不健康小班18个

分别占所选样本总面积的7.33%

24.62%

61.34%

6.71%。[结论] 该区域马尾松林总体上处于亚健康与不健康状况;天然林健康状况好于人工林;混交林健康状况优于马尾松纯林;高海拔、陡坡、边远区域马尾松林健康状况明显优于低海拔、居民密集区域。

Abstract

[Objective] The research on massion pine forest as superior tree species in East Dongting Lake area can provide the reference in scientific management for the regional forest

and improve regional environment and ecological environment construction. [Methods] The data about masson pine forest were gained through typical sublot survey

the second-class investigation of Yueyang forest resources and forest resources management information system in Hu'nan Province. The 14 indexes were selected and the index weight was ensured according to variance contribution rate. Then the score of sublots was determined by calculating represent 329 sublots compared with the existing health grade index. [Results] The evaluation results showed that the number of high quality sbulots was 14

healthy sublots was 76

sub-healthy sublots was 221

unhealthy sublots 18

possessing total area of the selected samples 7.33%

24.62%

61.34%

6.71%

respectively. [Conclusion] The masson pine forest in studied area was between sub-health and unhealthy in general; the natural forest health was much better than the plantation; the health situation of masson pine forest in high altitude

slope

remote area was significantly better than that in low altitude

dense population area.

关键词

Keywords

references

Costanza R, Norton B G, Haskell B D. Eeosystem Health:New Goals for Environmental Management[M]. Washington DC:Island Press, 1992.

Mageau M T, Costanza R, Ulanowicz R E. The development and initial tasting of a quantitive assessment of ecosystem health[J]. Ecosystem Health,1995,14(1):201-213.

沈文君,沈佐锐,王小艺.生态系统健康理论与评价方法探析[J].中国农业生态学报,2004,12(1):159-161.

马克明,孔红梅,关文彬,等.生态系统健康评价:方法与方向[J].生态学报,2001,21(12):2106-2116.

袁兴中,刘红,陆健健.生态系统健康评价:概念构架与指标选择[J].应用生态学报,2001,12(4):627-629.

张志城,牛海山,欧阳华."生态系统健"内涵探讨[J].资源科学,2005,1(27):136-141.

Haworth L, Brunk C, Jennex D, et al. A dual-perspective model of agroecosystem health:System functions and system goal(abstract)[J]. Journal of Agroecosystem and Enviromental Ethics, 1997, 102(11):127-152.

Karr J R. Assessing Logical Integrity in Running Waters:A Method and Its Rational[M]. Champaigre:History Survey, Illinois, Special Publication,1986.

O'laughlin. Forest ecosystem health assessment issues:definition, measurement and managemen implication[J]. Ecosystem Health, 1996,16(12):19-39.

Rapport D J. What constitutes ecosystem health[J]. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 1989,33(8):120-132.

陈高,代力民,姬兰柱,等.森林生态系统健康评估(1):模式、计算方法和指标体系[J].应用生态学报,2004,15(10):1743-1749.

肖风劲,张强.森林生态系统健康评价指标在中国的应用[J].地理学报,2003,61(58):804-808.

鲁绍伟,刘凤芹,余新晓.北京市八达岭林场森林生态系统健康性评价[J].水土保持学报,2006,20(3):79-82.

李秀英.森林健康评价指标体系初步研究与应用[D].北京:中国林业科学研究院,2006.

周早弘.油料林森林健康评价指标体系的研究[J].湖南农业科学,2009,3(2):114-117.

肖风劲,欧阳华,傅伯杰,等.森林生态系统健康评价指标及其在中国的应用[J].地理学报,2003,58(6):803-808.

鲁绍伟,柳凤,余新晓,等.北京市八达岭林场森林生态系统健康性评价[J].水土保持学报,2006,20(3):79-82.

刘大海,李宁,等. SPSS 15.0统计分析从入门到精通[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2008:298-317.

李金良,郑小贤.北京地区水源涵养林健康性指标体系的探讨[J].林业资源管理2004,5(1):31-34.

浏览量

1425

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

基于生态足迹模型的喀斯特高原山地生态系统健康评价研究

纵向岭谷区高速公路沿线生态系统健康评价

太原市城市生态系统健康评价及其趋势预测

东阳江流域生态系统健康评价

基于改进白化权函数的资源型城市土地利用系统健康灰色聚类评价