华中师范大学城市与资源环境科学学院,湖北,武汉,430079
纸质出版:2015
移动端阅览
徐京京, 黄建武. 安徽省耕地资源利用的生态社会效益计算方法及其应用[J]. 水土保持通报, 2015,35(4):157-162.
XU Jingjing, HUANG Jianwu. Calculating Method of Ecological and Social Benefits from Cultivated Land Resource and Its Application in Anhui Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2015, 35(4): 157-162.
徐京京, 黄建武. 安徽省耕地资源利用的生态社会效益计算方法及其应用[J]. 水土保持通报, 2015,35(4):157-162. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2015.04.031.
XU Jingjing, HUANG Jianwu. Calculating Method of Ecological and Social Benefits from Cultivated Land Resource and Its Application in Anhui Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2015, 35(4): 157-162. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2015.04.031.
[目的
]
计算安徽省耕地资源利用生态社会效益
为制定合理的耕地保护经济补偿标准提供依据。[方法
]
以安徽省2000
2005和2010年数据为基础
利用当量因子法、影子价格法等方法计算了历年单位面积耕地生态社会效益理论值
采用社会发展阶段系数对不同等级耕地生态社会效益现实值进行了计算。[结果
]
2000
2005和2010年安徽省耕地资源利用生态社会效益理论值分别为25 032.31
34 879.15
43 700.38元/hm
2
生态效益比重从2000年的15.53%上升到2010年的21.10%
而社会效益则从84.47%下降到79.90%。2005年低等、中等、高等优质耕地单位面积生态社会效益现实值分别为7 219.69
11 130.42和18 039.25元/hm
2
。[结论
]
单位面积耕地生态社会效益理论值和现实值有较大的差距
因此在制定单位面积耕地的生态社会效益补偿标准时
要充分考虑经济社会发展、区域耕地质量等级以及该区域人们支付意愿。
[Objective] Calculation of ecological and social benefits of cultivated land resource utilization can provide reliable basis for the standard economic compensation at the expense of land protection. [Methods] Based on the data of 2000
2005 and 2010
this paper calculated the theoretical ecological and social benefits using the methods of equivalent factor method and shadow price. The realistic ecological and social values of the cultivated lands were amended by social developmental phase coefficient of different grades of the cultivated lands. [Results] The results showed that the theoretical value of ecological and social benefits per hectare were 25 032.31 RMB in 2000
34 879.15 RMB in 2005
43 700.38 RMB in 2010
respectively. In which proportion of social benefit increased from 15.53 % in 2000 to 21.10% in 2010
while the proportion of social benefit decreased from 84.47% in 2000 to 79.90% in 2010.The low
medium and high qualities of cultivated lands had realistic values per hectare of ecological and social benefit were 7 219.69
1 1130.42 and 18 039.25 RMB in 2005
respectively. [Conclusion] There exists a gap between the real ecological and social benefit of unit area of arable land and the theoretical value. Whereas
the formulation of compensation standard of ecological social benefit from per unit area of arable land should comprehensively consider the economic and social development
the quality grade of regional cultivated land and the local people's willingness to pay.
牛海鹏,张安录.耕地利用生态社会效益测算方法及其应用[J].农业工程学报,2010,26(5):316-323.
蔡运龙,俞奉庆.中国耕地问题的症结与治本之策[J].中国土地科学,2004,18(3):13-17.
Costanza R, d'Arge R, de Groot R, et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature, 1997,386(6630):253-260.
陈丽,曲福田,师学义.耕地资源社会价值测算方法探讨:以山西省柳林县为例[J].资源科学,2006,28(6):86-90.
马莉,牛叔文,马利邦.甘肃省耕地资源转变为建设用地的价值损失评估[J].生态与农村环境学报,2010,26(5):407-412.
李翠珍,孔祥斌,孙宪海.北京市耕地资源价值体系及价值估算方法[J].地理学报,2008,63(3):321-329.
蔡银莺,李晓云,张安录.湖北省农地资源价值研究[J].自然资源学报,2007,22(1):121-130.
牛海鹏,张安录.耕地保护的外部性及其测算:以河南省焦作市为例[J].资源科学,2009,31(8):1400-1408.
庞英,王伟.青岛市耕地利用效益变化特征研究[J].山东农业大学学报:社会科学版,2007,9(3):17-22.
李景刚,欧名豪,张效军,等.耕地资源价值重建及其货币化评价:以青岛市为例[J].自然资源学报,2009,24(11):1870-1880.
谢高地,鲁春霞,冷允法,等.青藏高原生态资产的价值评估[J].自然资源学报,2003,18(2):189-196.
谢高地,鲁春霞,成升魁.全球生态系统服务价值评估研究进展[J].资源科学,2001,23(6):2-9.
杨庆媛,印文.收益还原法在农业用地价格评估中的应用浅析[J].西南师范大学:自然科学版,1999,24(1):103-109.
尚倩倩,宋戈,向长玉.黑龙江省巴彦县耕地资源价值体系及价值定量测算[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(3):231-236.
欧名豪,宗臻铃,董元华,等.区域生态重建的经济补偿办法探讨:以长江上游地区为例[J].南京农业大学学报,2000,23(4):109-112.
0
浏览量
1240
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621