1. 中国林业科学研究院沙漠林业试验中心, 内蒙古磴口,015200
2. 内蒙古农业大学林学院,内蒙古,呼和浩特,010019
纸质出版:2015
移动端阅览
章尧想, 刘芳, 葛根巴图, 等. 20种速生杨在乌兰布和沙区绿洲的适应性评价[J]. 水土保持通报, 2015,35(4):117-121.
ZHANG Yaoxiang, LIU Fang, Gegen Batu, et al. Evaluation of Growth Adaptability of 20 Poplar Species in Oasis Region of Ulan Buh Sandy Land[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2015, 35(4): 117-121.
章尧想, 刘芳, 葛根巴图, 等. 20种速生杨在乌兰布和沙区绿洲的适应性评价[J]. 水土保持通报, 2015,35(4):117-121. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2015.04.023.
ZHANG Yaoxiang, LIU Fang, Gegen Batu, et al. Evaluation of Growth Adaptability of 20 Poplar Species in Oasis Region of Ulan Buh Sandy Land[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2015, 35(4): 117-121. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2015.04.023.
[目的] 为满足乌兰布和沙漠绿洲防护林体系构建对优良造林树种选择的要求
对多个品种速生杨在乌兰布和沙区绿洲的适应性进行评价。[方法] 以北抗、08、中林等系列的20个引进速生杨品种为研究对象
当前主要造林树种新疆杨为参照
运用系统聚类分析和多因素模糊综合评判方法对20种速生杨在乌兰布和沙漠绿洲地区生长初期适应性进行综合评价。[结果] 08-01
创新、中林2005
北抗16-22
08-02
08-03
中林315
08-07
天黑、京2等10个品种在速生性、成活状况、抗病虫害能力方面均明显优于新疆杨;京6
北抗16-27
Simplot
08-09
08-08
08-14等6个品种各项评价指标与新疆杨接近;辽宁杨(鲁×山)、北抗16-8
08-04
DN-34等4个树种综合评价适应性低于新疆杨。[结论] 08-01等10个品种能够在乌兰布和沙漠绿洲地区良好生长
可以作为该区造林和植物资源收集储备的备选树种。京6等6个品种综合评价适应性中等
辽宁杨(鲁×山)等4个品种适应性较差
无法在该区正常生长。
[Objective] In order to select excellent afforestation species for forest system oasis region of Ulan Buh sandy land
initial growth adaptability of poplar varieties in the oasis region of Ulan Buh sandy land was evaluated. [Methods] About 20 poplar varieties including Beikang
08 and Zhonglin series were introduced as research objects and the Xinjiang Populous that is the current main afforestation species were taken as a reference. The initial growth adaptability of these poplar species in the oasis region of Ulan Buh sandy land were comprehensively evaluated with systematic cluster analysis and multi-factor fuzzy comprehensive evaluation. [Results] The growth rate
survival status and pest resistibility of varieties 08-01
innovation
Zhonglin 2005
Beikang 16-22
Beikang 08-02
Beikang 08-03
Zhonglin 315
08-07
Dark
Jing 2 were better than that of Xinjiang Populous. All evaluation index of Jing 6
Beikang 16-27
Simplot 08-09
08-08
08-14 were similar to the indices of Xinjiang Populous. Comparing to Xinjiang Populous
varieties of Liaoning poplar
Beikang 16-8
08-04
DN-34 were assessed with weaker integrated growth adaptability. [Conclusion] Among the 20 varieties
ten varieties(08-01
etc.) are able to growth vigorously in the Ulan Buh sandy land and can serve as an alternative species for afforestation and plant resources reserves in this area
six varieties(Jing 6
etc.) were assessed at medium adaptability
other four varieties(Liaoning poplar
etc.) belong to poor adaptability group that are unable to grow normally in the Ulan Buh sandy land.
王葆芳,赵英铭,王志刚,等.干旱区人工绿洲不同农田防护林模式防护效应及相关性[J].林业科学研究,2008,21(5):707-712.
董智,李红丽,孙保平,等.乌兰布和沙漠东北缘磴口县沙尘天气变化规律及其对防护林体系建设的响应[J].干旱区资源与环境,2004,18(S1):269-275.
张红利,张秋良,马利强.乌兰布和沙地东北缘不同配置的农田防护林小气候效应的对比研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2009,23(11):191-194.
曹兵,徐锡增.臭椿、新疆杨混交林对光肩星天牛选择寄主行为的影响[J].林业科学,2006,42(9):55-60.
牛锦凤.抗虫杨北抗一号在宁夏地区育苗技术初探[J].宁夏农林科技,2012,53(9):31.
赵英铭,王志刚,刘静,等.光肩星天牛在18种杨树上寄生、发育的试验研究[J].林业实用技术,2012(4):32-34.
赵英铭,郝玉光,张格,等.18个杨树无性系抗光肩星天牛的对比研究[J].防护林科技,2012(5):3-6.
吴林森,严小宝.河滩地杨树生长适应性的综合评判研究[J].安徽农业科学,2006,34(15):3672-3674.
姚庆群,白昌军,王文强,等.不同统计方法对豆科牧草种质资源适应性评价的比较[J].亚热带植物科学,2009,38(1):26-30.
陈艳瑞,刘康,陈启民,等.准噶尔盆地南缘防护林树种适宜性评价[J].干旱区资源与环境,2011,25(11):152-156.
李鸿祥,李高,戎郁萍,等.30个草坪型高羊茅品种在华北地区的适应性评价[J].草地学报,2012,20(5):972-976.
刘旃麟,段瑞军,刘国道,等.不同柱花草品种沙地种植适应性的比较[J].热带生物学报,2010,2(1):138-143.
张莹花,徐延双,齐力旺,等.不同种杨树在民勤的引种适应性初步研究[J].西部林业科学,2007,36(2):38-43.
陈鸿雕,梁鸿恩,胡崇富,等.辽宁杨、辽河杨、盖杨栽培技术要点[J].辽宁林业科技,1996(5):9-12.
0
浏览量
1059
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621