1. 佳木斯大学公共卫生学院,黑龙江,佳木斯,154007
2. 佳木斯大学生命科学学院,黑龙江,佳木斯,154007
3. 佳木斯大学理学院,黑龙江,佳木斯,154007
纸质出版:2015
移动端阅览
张淑兰, 张海军, 张武, 等. 小兴安岭不同森林类型枯落物储量及其持水特性比较[J]. 水土保持通报, 2015,35(4):85-90.
ZHANG Shulan, ZHANG Haijun, ZHANG Wu, et al. Comparison of Water-holding Characteristics and Biomass of Litter Under Different Forest Types in Xiaoxingan Mountains[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2015, 35(4): 85-90.
张淑兰, 张海军, 张武, 等. 小兴安岭不同森林类型枯落物储量及其持水特性比较[J]. 水土保持通报, 2015,35(4):85-90. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2015.04.017.
ZHANG Shulan, ZHANG Haijun, ZHANG Wu, et al. Comparison of Water-holding Characteristics and Biomass of Litter Under Different Forest Types in Xiaoxingan Mountains[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2015, 35(4): 85-90. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2015.04.017.
[目的
]
对小兴安岭主要森林类型林下枯落物蓄积量进行调查分析和持水特性研究
为该区森林生态服务功能评价提供重要依据和理论基础。[方法
]
选择6种典型森林类型设置样地测定枯落物现储量
并采用浸水法对枯落物持水特性进行测定
计算其最大拦蓄量和有效拦蓄量。[结果
]
主要森林类型枯落物蓄积量介于13.53~29.48 t/hm
2
大多是半分解层蓄积量高于未分解层。不同森林类型最大持水率与最大持水量表现不一致
其中最大持水率为243.19%~524.0%
最大持水量为56.81~106.90 t/hm
2
。不同森林类型的最大拦蓄量与有效拦蓄量的表现也略有差异
最大拦蓄量为33.43~64.42 t/hm
2
有效拦蓄量为24.91~48.38 t/hm
2
。枯落物层的持水率与浸泡时间呈显著对数关系
而吸水速率与浸泡时间呈显著幂函数关系。[结论
]
受树种特性、枯落物储量、分解速率及林龄的影响
该区不同森林类型林下枯落物储量及其持水特性差异显著。
[Objective] The litter storage and the water-holding capacities in the main forest types in Xiaoxingan Mountains were studied to provide important data and theoretical basis for the evaluation of forest ecological service function in Xiaoxingan Mountains. [Methods] 6 kinds of typical forest types were selected to set sample plot and measure the litter reserves
and the soaking method was adopted to measure the water-holding characteristics of litters
then the maximum interception and effective interception were calculated. [Results] the litter biomass of main forest types ranged from 13.53 t/hm2 to 29.48 t/hm2
and the biomass of the half-decomposed litter of the majority of forest types was higher than that of non-decomposed litters. The rate of water-holding capacity and water-holding capacity of litter layer in different forest types were different. The ratio of maximum water-holding capacity varied from 243.19% to 524.0%
while the maximum water-holding capacity ranged from 56.81 t/hm2 to 106.90 t/hm2. The performance between maximum interception and maximum effective interception of litter layer in different forest types was also slightly different. The maximum interception varied from 33.43 t/hm2 to 64.42 t/hm2
while the effective interception ranged from 24.91 t/hm2 to 48.38 t/hm2. The relationships between water-holding rate of litters and soak time in different forest types could be significantly fitted by Logarithmic equation
and the relationships between water absorption rate and soak time were significantly described by power function. [Conclusion] The litter reserves and its water characteristics in different forest types were obviously different due to the tree species characteristics
litter reserves
decomposition rate and forest ages.
官丽莉,周国逸,张德强,等.鼎湖山南亚热带常绿阔叶林凋落物量20年动态研究[J].植物生态学报,2004,28(4):449-456.
刘向东,吴钦孝.黄土高原油松人工林枯枝落叶层水文生态功能研究[J].水土保持学报,1991,5(4):87-91.
郭剑芬,杨玉盛,陈光水,等.森林凋落物分解研究进展[J].林业科学,2006,42(4):93-100.
杨吉华,张永涛,李红云,等.不同林分枯落物的持水性能及对表层土壤理化性状的影响[J].水土保持学报,2003,17(2):141-144.
黄进,张金池,陶宝先.江宁小流域主要森林类型水源涵养功能研究[J].水土保持学报,2009,23(1):182-186.
陈奇伯,解明曙,张洪江.森林枯落物影响地表径流和土壤侵蚀研究动态[J].北京林业大学学报,1994,16(S):88-97.
郭汉清,韩有志,白秀梅.不同林分枯落物水文效应和地表糙率系数研究[J].水土保持学报,2010,24(2):179-183.
时忠杰,王彦辉,徐丽宏,等.六盘山主要森林类型枯落物的水文功能[J].北京林业大学学报,2009,31(1):91-100.
汪永英,陶继哲.小兴安岭南坡4种林分类型枯落物水文特性研究[J].森林工程,2008,24(3):22-26.
李文影,满秀玲,张阳武.不同林龄白桦次生林土壤特性及其水源涵养功能[J].中国水土保持科学,2009,7(5):63-69.
郭辉,董希斌,蒙宽宏,等.小兴安岭低质林采伐改造后枯落物持水特性变化分析[J].林业科学,2010,46(6):147-155.
姜海燕,赵雨森,陈祥伟,等.大兴安岭岭南几种主要森林类型土壤水文功能研究[J].水土保持学报,2007,21(3):149-153.
0
浏览量
1838
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621