福建省农业科学院土壤肥料研究所,福建,福州,350013
纸质出版:2015
移动端阅览
王利民, 林新坚, 黄东风, 等. 不同培肥模式下闽东茶园水土及其氮磷流失特征[J]. 水土保持通报, 2015,35(4):69-72.
WANG Limin, LIN Xinjian, HUANG Dongfeng, et al. Effect of Different Fertilization Patterns on Losses of Soil, Water and Nitrogen, Phosphorus from Tea Garden in Eastern Fujian Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2015, 35(4): 69-72.
王利民, 林新坚, 黄东风, 等. 不同培肥模式下闽东茶园水土及其氮磷流失特征[J]. 水土保持通报, 2015,35(4):69-72. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2015.04.015.
WANG Limin, LIN Xinjian, HUANG Dongfeng, et al. Effect of Different Fertilization Patterns on Losses of Soil, Water and Nitrogen, Phosphorus from Tea Garden in Eastern Fujian Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2015, 35(4): 69-72. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2015.04.015.
[目的] 研究不同培肥模式对闽东茶园水土及其氮磷流失的影响
为该区茶园水土流失评价及防控提供科学依据。[方法] 通过径流小区试验
设置6个处理:全量化肥(NPK)
半量化肥+半量有机肥(1/2 NPKOM)
全量有机肥(OM)
全量化肥+豆科绿肥(NPKL)
半量化肥+半量有机肥+豆科绿肥(1/2NPKOM+L)和不施肥(CK)。[结果] 不同培肥处理下径流流失量的大小顺序为:OM > 1/2 NPKOM > CK > NPKL > 1/2NPKOM+L > NPK
泥沙流失量表现为:OM > 1/2 NPKOM > NPKL > CK > NPK > 1/2NPKOM+L;OM处理中径流携带的全氮、可溶性氮、硝态氮、铵态氮、全磷、可溶性磷等氮磷组分的流失量均较高
而1/2 NPKOM+L中这些氮磷组分流失量则相对较低
且泥沙结合态的全氮、全磷流失量在各处理中也有类似的变化规律。[结论] 1/2NPKOM+L处理在减控茶园水土及其氮磷流失方面具有良好的保土保肥效果。
[Objective] The effect of fertilization patterns on losses of soil
water and nitrogen
phosphorus from tea garden in eastern Fujian Province was studied in order to provide a scientific basis for evaluation and prevention and control of soil and water loss in this region. [Methods] The experiment contained six treatments: no fertilization(CK)
chemical fertilizers(NPK)
half-organic manure plus half-chemical fertilizers(1/2 NPKOM)
organic manure(OM)
legume stover returned plus chemical fertilizers(NPKL)
half-organic manure plus legume stover returned plus half-chemical fertilizers(1/2 NPKOM+L). [Results] Among all the treatments
water losses were ranked as OM > 1/2 NPKOM > NPKL > CK > NPK > 1/2 NPKOM+L
and soil losses followed the orders of OM > 1/2 NPKOM > NPKL > CK > NPK > 1/2 NPKOM+L. Furthermore
the OM treatment had maximum concentrations of soil nutrients including total N (TN)
dissolved N (DN)
NO3-N
NH4+-N
total P(TP) and dissolved P(DP) losses in runoff
while the 1/2 NPKOM+L treatment had minimum concentrations of those nitrogen and phosphorus fractions compared to other fertilizer treatments. Similarly
the contents of TN
TP in sediment were the highest in OM treatment
but the lowest in 1/2 NPKOM+L treatment. [Conclusion] The 1/2 NPKOM+L treatment could be considered as a better choice of fertilization practice with respect to reducing soil
water
and nitrogen
phosphorus nutrient losses from tea soils in the region.
王峰,吴志丹,陈玉真,等.提高福建茶园土壤肥力质量的技术途径[J].福建农业学报,2012,27(10):1139-1145.
龚伟,颜晓元,蔡祖聪,等.长期施肥对华北小麦-玉米轮作土壤物理性质和抗蚀性影响研究[J].土壤学报,2009,46(3):520-525.
郭甜,何丙辉,姚军,等.紫色土坡耕地施肥水平对土壤侵蚀及氮磷流失影响[J].水土保持学报,2012,26(4):59-63.
徐华勤,肖润林,杨知建,等.不同培肥措施对红壤茶园土壤微生物量碳的影响[J].生态学杂志,2007,26(7):1009-1013.
姚槐应.不同利用年限茶园土壤的化学及微生物生态特征研究[J].浙江农业科学,2002(3):129-131.
山仑.水土保持与可持续发展[J].中国科学院院刊,2012,27(3):116-120.
Liang Yin, Li Decheng, Lu Xixi, et al. Soil erosion changes over the past five decades in the red soil region of Southern China[J]. Journal of Mountain Science,2010,7(1):92-99.
Cogle A L, Rao K P C, Yule D F, et al. Soil management for Alfisols in the semiarid tropics:erosion, enrichment ratios and runoff[J]. Soil Use and Management, 2002,18(1):10-17.
章文波,付金生.不同类型雨量资料估算降雨侵蚀力[J].资源科学,2003,25(1):35-41.
张晓明,余新晓,武思宏,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区典型流域土地利用/土地覆被变化对径流产沙的影响[J].北京林业大学学报,2007,29(6):115-122.
Dahlke C, Bork H R. Soil Erosion and Soil Organic Carbon Storage on the Chinese Loess Plateau[M]. New York:Springer, 2012:83-98.
曾立雄,黄志霖,肖文发,等.三峡库区不同土地利用类型氮磷流失特征及其对环境因子的响应[J].环境科学,2012,33(10):3390-3396.
中华人民共和国林业部科技司.林业标准汇编[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1991:96-293.
国家环境保护总局.水和废水监测分析方法[M].4版.北京:中国环境科学出版社,2002:3-8.
王晓南,孟广涛,姜培曦,等.浅谈植物措施在水土保持中的作用机理[J].水土保持应用技术,2008(4):25-27.
王利民,林新坚,黄东风,等.红黄壤茶园不同培肥模式的土壤理化效应[J].东北林业大学学报,2012,40(1):54-57.
Mankin K R, Ngandu D M, Barden C J, et al. Grass-shrub riparian buffer removal of sediment, phosphorus, and nitrogen from simulated runoff1[J]. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 2007,43(5):1108-1116.
Schoonover J E, Williard K W J, Zaczek J J, et al. Nutrient attenuation in agricultural surface runoff by riparian buffer zones in southern Illinois, USA[J]. Agroforestry Systems, 2005,64(2):169-180.
Lowrance R, Altier L S, Williams R G, et al. REMM:The riparian ecosystem management model[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2000,55(1):27-34.
Peterjohn W T, Correll D L. Nutrient dynamics in an agricultural watershed:Observations on the role of a riparian forest[J]. Ecology, 1984,65(5):1466-1475.
Vymazal J. Removal of nutrients in various types of constructed wetlands[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2007,380(1/3):48-65.
Prior H, Johnes P J. Regulation of surface water quality in a Cretaceous Chalk catchment, UK:An assessment of the relative importance of instream and wetland processes[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2002,282(2):159-174.
Wen Yue, Chen Yi, Zheng Nan, et al. Effects of plant biomass on nitrate removal and transformation of carbon sources in subsurface-flow constructed wetlands[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2010,101(19):7286-7292.
王利民,李卫华,范平,等.长期培肥下红黄壤区茶园土壤酶活性的变化[J].茶叶科学,2012,32(4):347-352.
Roldán A, Salinas-García J R, Alguacil M M, et al. Soil enzyme activities suggest advantages of conservation tillage practices in sorghum cultivation under subtropical conditions[J]. Geoderma, 2005,129(3/4):178-185.
0
浏览量
1793
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621