1. 国际竹藤中心竹藤科学与技术重点实验室,北京,100102
2. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,北京,100101
纸质出版:2015
移动端阅览
刘广路, 范少辉, 蔡春菊, 等. 不同混交模式毛竹林下土壤抗侵蚀性研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2015,35(4):12-17.
LIU Guanglu, FAN Shaohui, CAI Chunju, et al. Soil Anti-erodibility Under Moso Bamboo with Different Mixture Patterns[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2015, 35(4): 12-17.
刘广路, 范少辉, 蔡春菊, 等. 不同混交模式毛竹林下土壤抗侵蚀性研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2015,35(4):12-17. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2015.04.004.
LIU Guanglu, FAN Shaohui, CAI Chunju, et al. Soil Anti-erodibility Under Moso Bamboo with Different Mixture Patterns[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2015, 35(4): 12-17. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2015.04.004.
[目的] 揭示毛竹林下土壤抗蚀性的主要影响要因子
为进一步研究土壤抗蚀性影响机制提供参考。[方法] 采用野外调查与室内分析相结合的方法
以常绿阔叶林和杉木林为对照
开展了8竹2阔林、6竹4阔林、毛竹纯林、8杉2竹林等不同混交模式毛竹林土壤抗蚀性及其影响因素研究。[结果] 常绿阔叶林的土壤抗蚀性最强
杉木纯林最差
毛竹混交林抗蚀性优于毛竹纯林
混交林中6竹4阔林的抗蚀性较好
8竹2阔和8杉2竹林次之。崩解速率的变化趋势与抗蚀性变化趋势不同
常绿阔叶林土壤崩解速率最慢
6竹4阔林最快
8竹2阔林、杉木林、8杉2竹林低于毛竹纯林。综合考虑不同林分类型的土壤抗蚀性和崩解速率
8竹2阔林是一个较好的混交模式。[结论] 土壤和植被结构对土壤抗蚀性有重要影响
毛竹林土壤抗蚀性与有机质含量、非毛管孔隙度、总孔隙度、土壤容重、竹鞭的生物量、枝叶生物量存在着显著的相关关系(p<0.05)
其中土壤有机质含量和枝生物量对土壤抗蚀性影响最大。
[Objective] To reveal the key factor of soil anti-erodibility in filed of moso bamboo in order to provide references for further studing influence mechanism of soil anti-erodibility. [Methods] Using the method of field investigation and laboratory analysis
changes and influences of soil anti-erodibility under moso bamaboo with different mixture patterns were examined. The forest types included the forest Ⅰ(evergreen broad-leaved forest)
Ⅱ(ratio of moso bamboo to broadleaf trees was 8:2)
Ⅲ(ratio of moso bamboo to broadleaf trees was 6:4)
Ⅳ(pure-moso bamboo forest)
Ⅴ(ratio of Chinese fir to moso bamboo was 8:2)
and Ⅵ(Chinese fir). [Results] The soil anti-erodibility was the strongest for evergreen broad-leaved forest and the poorest for Chinese fir. The soil anti-erodibility of mixed-moso bamboo forests was better than pure-moso bamboo's. Among those mixed-moso bamboo forests
the forest Ⅲ was the best one
followed by the forest Ⅱ and forest Ⅳ. The changes of soil disintegration rate of those forests were different from the trend of the soil anti-erodibility. The soil disintegration rate was slowest for evergreen broad-leaved forest and fastest for forest Ⅲ. The forest Ⅱ
Ⅴ
and Ⅵ were better than the pure-moso bamboo forest. With regard to the different forest types of soil anti-erodibility and disintegration rate
the forest Ⅱ was regarded as the better forest type. [Conclusion] There was a significant correlation(p<0.05) between the soil anti-erodibility and organic matter content
non-capillary porosity
total porosity
soil bulk density
rhizome biomass
and foliage biomass based on correlation analysis. The soil anti-erodibility was affected by change of soil and vegetation structure. The changes of soil anti-erodibility credited biomass distribution and change of soil structure.
高维森,王佑民.土壤抗蚀抗冲性研究综述[J].水土保持通报,1992,12(5):59-63.
杜满义,范少辉,刘广路,等.土地利用方式转变对赣中地区土壤活性有机碳的影响[J].应用生态学报2013,24(10):2897-2904.
刘蔚漪,范少辉,漆良华,等.闽北不同类型毛竹林水源涵养功能研究[J].水土保持学报,2011,25(2):92-96.
杨玉盛,何宗明,李振向,等.不同植物类型下紫色土抗蚀性研究[J].福建水土保持,1992,4(3):34-40.
徐秋芳,姜培坤,俞益武,等.不同林用地土壤抗蚀性能研究[J].浙江林学院学报,2001,18(4):362-365.
范少辉,刘蔚漪,郭宝华,等.闽北不同类型毛竹林生态系统植被状况对地表径流的影响[J].热带作物学报,2012,33(7):1-7.
刘广路,范少辉,漆良华,等.闽西北不同类型毛竹林养分分布及生物循环特征[J].生态学杂志,2010,29(11):2155-2161.
张昌顺,范少辉,官凤英,等.闽北毛竹林的土壤渗透性及其影响因子[J].林业科学,2009,45(1):36-42.
郭培才,王佑民.黄土高原沙棘林地土壤抗蚀抗冲性及其指标的研究[J].中国水土保持,1992(4):27-30.
阮伏水,吴雄海.关于土壤可蚀性指标的讨论[J].水土保持通报,1996,16(6):68-72.
沈慧,姜凤岐,杜晓军.水土保持林土壤抗蚀性能评价研究[J].应用生态学报,2000,11(3):345-348.
张金池,刘道平,顾长丰,等.浙江安吉主要植被类型土壤抗蚀性指标筛选及评价模型构建[J].亚热带水土保持,2006(2):1-5.
张建辉,倪师军,朱波,等.紫色土不同土地利用条件下的土壤抗冲性研究[J]. 中国科学(E辑):技术科学,2003(S1):63-70.
付允,贾亚男,蓝家程.岩溶区不同土地利用方式土壤抗蚀性分析[J].水土保持研究,2012,18(5):5-9.
周维,张建辉.金沙江支流冲沟侵蚀区四种土地利用方式下土壤入渗特性研究[J].土壤,2006,38(3):333-337.
刘霞,张光灿,刘信儒,等.鲁中石质山地不同林分类型土壤结构特征[J].水土保持学报,2005,5(6):49-52.
漆良华,张旭东,周金星,等.湘西北小流域典型植被恢复群落土壤贮水量与入渗特性[J].林业科学,2007,43(3):1-7.
刘蔚漪,范少辉,刘广路,等.闽北不同类型毛竹林冠层降水再分配特征[J].南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2011,35(4):1-6.
刘旦旦,张鹏辉,王健,等.黄土坡面不同土地利用类型土壤抗蚀性对比[J].林业科学,2013,49(9):102-106.
张昌顺.闽北不同类型毛竹林生态功能研究[D].北京:中国林业科学研究院,2008.
薛萐,刘国彬,张超,等.黄土丘陵区人工灌木林土壤抗蚀性演变特征[J].中国农业科学,2010,43(15):3143-3150.
喻武,杜珊,万丹,等.色季拉山川滇高山栎林下土壤抗蚀性分析[J].林业科技开发,2013,27(4):37-41.
马西军,程金花,张洪江,等.山西中阳5种人工林地土壤的抗蚀性研究[J].西北农林科技大学学报:自然科学版,2012,40(7):113-119.
张旭贤,高华端,孙利军,等.贵州不同碳酸盐岩坡耕地土壤侵蚀特征研究[J].中国水土保持,2013(9):42-45.
焦菊英,王宁,杜华栋,等.土壤侵蚀对植被发育演替的干扰与植物的抗侵蚀特性研究进展[J].草业学报,2012,21(5):311-318.
宋坤,陈玉霞,潘晓星,等.5种护坡植物根系土壤抗侵蚀性比较[J].东北林业大学学报,2013,41(9):63-67.
马笑,朱首军.黄土丘陵沟壑区梯田地埂土壤崩解特性试验研究[J].西北林学院学报,2013,28(4):21-25.
张颖,牛健植,谢宝元,等.森林植被对坡面土壤水蚀作用的动力学机理[J].生态学报,2008,28(10):5084-5094.
和利钊,张杨珠,刘杰,等.不同施肥和调理剂对侵蚀红壤肥力和抗侵蚀性的修复效应[J].水土保持学报,2012,26(4):54-58.
0
浏览量
1584
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621