1. 煤矿灾害动力学与控制国家重点实验室,重庆,400044
2. 重庆大学资源及环境科学学院,重庆,400044
纸质出版:2015
移动端阅览
齐静, 袁兴中, 刘红, 等. 重庆市三峡库区水源涵养重要功能区生态系统服务功能时空演变特征[J]. 水土保持通报, 2015,35(3):256-260.
QI Jing, YUAN Xingzhong, LIU Hong, et al. Spatiotemporal Characteristics of Ecosystem Service in Key Water Resource Conservation Function Area of Three Gorges Area in Chongqing City[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2015, 35(3): 256-260.
齐静, 袁兴中, 刘红, 等. 重庆市三峡库区水源涵养重要功能区生态系统服务功能时空演变特征[J]. 水土保持通报, 2015,35(3):256-260. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2015.03.053.
QI Jing, YUAN Xingzhong, LIU Hong, et al. Spatiotemporal Characteristics of Ecosystem Service in Key Water Resource Conservation Function Area of Three Gorges Area in Chongqing City[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2015, 35(3): 256-260. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2015.03.053.
[目的
]
揭示重庆市三峡库区水源涵养重要功能区2000-2010年生态系统服务功能的时空演变特征
为其生态环境的可持续性管理提供依据。[方法
]
在RS和GIS技术支撑下
选择生物多样性维持、土壤保持、水源涵养和碳固定4项生态系统服务功能建立评估模型。[结果
]
(1) 10 a间
研究区生态系统服务功能高等级面积增加了386.14 km
2
; (2) 各单项服务功能中
水源涵养功能高等级面积增加了4 016.4 km
2
土壤保持功能高、较高和中等级面积分别增加了516.2 km
2
2 825.9 km
2
和2 493.8 km
2
; (3) 空间分布显示
生态系统服务功能较好的区域主要集中于开县北部、巫山县北部
奉节县南部以及长江干流支流两岸和区内植被覆盖较好的山脊(呈带状分布);生态系统服务功能较差的区域主要分布于长寿、垫江、梁平地势较平缓地区和开县、云阳、奉节、巫山地势陡峭、地质灾害多发地区。[结论
]
研究区内生物多样性维持功能、水源涵养功能10 a间总体呈上升趋势
土壤保持功能、固碳功能总体较差
但两者呈上升趋势
好转区域主要集中于季节性水位淹没形成新生湿地的长江干流沿岸。
[Objective] To reveal the spatial-temporal changes of the ecosystem services in the key ecological functional reservoir of the Three Gorges area in Chongqing from 2000 to 2010
in order to provide basis for the sustainable management of ecological environment in the Three Gorges area. [Methods] Based on RS and GIS techniques
four major ecosystem services including biodiversity maintenance
soil conservation
water conversation and carbon fixation were used to establish the evaluation models. [Results] (1) During the decade
the high level area of the functional ecosystem services in the research area increased by 386.14 km2. (2) For each single ecosystem service function
the high level of the water conservation increased by 4 016.4 km2; the high
relatively high and medium level of the soil conservation increased by 516.2 km2
2 825.9 km2 and 2 493.8 km2 respectively. (3) From the spatial distribution
the better functional areas of the ecosystem services were mostly distributed in the north of Kaixian County
the north of Wushan County
the South of Fengjie County
and both sides of the tributaries of the Yangtze River and the region of the strap shaped ridge covered with better vegetation. The poorer functional regions of the ecosystem services were mostly distributed in Changshou County
Dianjiang County
the flat terrain areas of Liangping
steep terrain and ecological disaster-prone areas of Kaixian
Yunyang
Fengjie
Wushan Counties. [Conclusion] During the decade
the biodiversity maintenance function and the water conservation trend to rise; the soil conservation and the carbon fixation function are generally poor
but both are on the rise trend; the area of improvement is distributed in the new wetlands on both sides of the trunk stream of the Yangtze River formed by seasonal water inundation.
Ouyang Zhiyun, Wang Xiaoke, Miao Hong. A primary study on Chinese terrestrial ecosystem services and their ecological-economic values[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,1998,19(5):607-613.
Kreuter U P, Harris H G, Matlock M D, Ronald E L. Change in ecosystem service values in the San Antonio area, Texas[J]. Ecological Economics,2001,39(3):333-346.
Costanza R, d'Arge R, Groot R, et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Ecological Economics, 1998,25(1):3-15.
De Groot R S, Wilson M A, Boumans R M J. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services[J]. Ecological Economics, 2002,41(3):393-408.
谢高地,鲁春霞,肖玉,等.青藏高原草地生态系统服务功能价值评估[J].山地学报,2003,21(1):50-55.
袁兴中,肖红艳,颜文涛,等.成渝经济区土地利用与生态服务价值动态分析[J].生态学杂志,2012,31(1):180-186.
国务院西部开发办领导小组办公室.生态功能区划暂行规程[Z].北京:国家环境保护总局,2002.
凡非得,罗俊,王克林,等.桂西北喀斯特地区生态系统服务功能重要性评价与空间分析[J].生态学杂志,2011,30(4):804-809.
张文广,胡远满,张晶,等.岷江上游地区近30 a森林生态系统水源涵养量与价值变化[J].生态学杂志,2007,26(7):1063-1067.
赵同谦,欧阳志云,王效科,等.中国陆地地表水生态系统服务功能及其生态经济价值评价[J].生态学报,2004,24(6):443-452.
邓坤枚,石培礼,谢高地.长江上游森林生态系统水源涵养量与价值的研究[J].资源科学,2002,24(6):68-73.
刘承.县域生态系统水土保持功能及价值研究:以四川宝兴县为例[D].成都:中国科学院成都山地灾害与环境研究所,2009.
汪涛,朱波,罗专溪,等.紫色土坡耕地径流特征试验研究[J].水土保持学报,2008,22(6):30-34.
谢云,林燕,张岩.通用土壤流失方程的发展与应用[J].地理科学进展,2010,5(3):279-287.
吴昌广,曾毅,周志翔,等.三峡库区土壤可蚀性K值研究[J].中国水土保持科学,2010,8:(3):8-11.
张照录,薛重生.通用土壤流失方程的研究进展及其改进方法[J].地学前缘,2004,11(4):608-608.
张岩,袁建平,刘宝元.土壤侵蚀预报模型中的植被覆盖与管理因子研究进展[J].应用生态学报,2002,13(8):1033-1036.
张宝雷,张淑敏,周启刚,等.土地利用和生态系统服务功能变化研究:以三峡库区大宁河流域为例[J].长江流域资源与环境,2007,16(2):181-185.
王晓杰.重庆主城区不同林地类型碳汇效益研究[D].重庆:西南大学,2011.
王万忠,焦菊英.中国的土壤侵蚀因子定量评价研究[J].水土保持通报,1996,16(5):1-20.
0
浏览量
1733
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621