植草沟对北京市道路地表径流的调控效应

郭凤; 陈建刚; 杨军; 孟莹莹; 龚应安

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2015.03.038

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

植草沟对北京市道路地表径流的调控效应

试验研究

- 植草沟对北京市道路地表径流的调控效应
- Regulatory Effect of Grassed Swales on Road Surface Runoff in Beijing City
- 水土保持通报 2015年35卷第3期页码：176-181
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 北京林业大学森林培育和保护教育部重点验室,北京,100083
  2. 北京市水科学技术研究院,北京,100044
  3. 清华大学地球系统科学研究中心, 地球系统数值模拟教育部重点实验室,北京,100084
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  北京市科委项目"北京中心城区下凹桥区积滞水防控技术研究与示范"(Z121100000312037);教育部留学回国人员启动基金(652450)
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2015.03.038
  中图分类号：
- 纸质出版：2015
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
郭凤, 陈建刚, 杨军, 等. 植草沟对北京市道路地表径流的调控效应[J]. 水土保持通报, 2015,35(3):176-181.

GUO Feng, CHEN Jiangang, YANG Jun, et al. Regulatory Effect of Grassed Swales on Road Surface Runoff in Beijing City[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2015, 35(3): 176-181.
郭凤, 陈建刚, 杨军, 等. 植草沟对北京市道路地表径流的调控效应[J]. 水土保持通报, 2015,35(3):176-181. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2015.03.038.

GUO Feng, CHEN Jiangang, YANG Jun, et al. Regulatory Effect of Grassed Swales on Road Surface Runoff in Beijing City[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2015, 35(3): 176-181. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2015.03.038.

摘要

[目的

]

分析植草沟对北京城市道路径流的水量和水质的调控效应

为北京市雨洪管理提供参考。[方法

]

实地建立植草沟

并根据北京市多年降雨资料和主干道路径流水质2010-2012年的监测结果设置径流水量和水质。[结果

]

(1) 降雨历时短

降雨强度低时植草沟的调控水量的功能明显。在降雨历时为3 h

降雨重现期为0.33 a时

50 m

的植草沟可削减50 m

沥青道路上产生的66%的径流量

降雨强度相对降雨历时来说对植草沟传输入渗的影响更大。(2) 植草沟对水质污染物有一定的去除效果

但达不到完全净化。建设的植草沟能够削减径流中的氨氮达20%

总磷达35%

COD达22%。(3) 植被覆盖度能影响植草沟的调控能力。植被覆盖度增加60%

植草沟对0.33年重现期降雨1 h的雨量入渗率提高了8%。(4) 若建立与北京市城六区道路等长度、宽2 m的植草沟

对1 a

2 a重现期24 h降雨形成的道路径流削减率分别为96.3%和56.0%

但对50 a极端降雨道路径流量的削减率仅为13.0%。[结论

]

植草沟对北京市道路地表径流具有一定的调蓄洪峰流量

延缓产流时间

减少径流污染的作用

但无法单独作为有效控制城市道路地表径流水量的管理措施。

Abstract

[Objective] To analyze the regulatory effect of grassed swales on road surface runoff in order to provide reference for managing rainfall flood in Beijing City. [Methods] The grassed swales were constructed

and the volume and quality of water flowing was designed based on the data of the average rainfall situation and water quality of road surface runoff in Beijing City recorded during 2010-2012. [Results] (1) The effect on reducing the volume of surface runoff was stronger under rain events with short durations and low intensities. When the duration of the simulated rain event was set to three hours and the return period of rainfall was set as 0.33 year

the 50 m2 grassed swales can reduce 66% of the total volume of surface runoff generated from a 50 m2 road section. The intensity of a rain event has stronger influence on reducing the volume of surface runoff than the duration; (2) The grassed swales could improve the water quality but could not remove the pollutants entirely. The removal rates of ammonia nitrogen

total phosphorus

and chemical oxygen demand(COD) was 20%

35%

and 22%

respectively; (3) The vegetation cover had an impact on the effectiveness of the grassed swales. When the vegetation cover increased by 60%

the volume of infiltrated water increased by 8% for a simulated rain event with 0.33-year return period and one hour of duration. (4) If two-meter wide grassed swales can be built along all roads in the six urban districts

they can reduce the road surface runoff resulted from rain events with one-year and two-year return period in 24 hours by 96.3% and 56%

respectively. However

for extreme precipitation such as rain events with 50-year return period

the reduction of road surface runoff is only 13%. [Conclusion] The grassed swales had certain effects on reducing the peak flow

delaying the time of runoff

and improving the water quality of runoff in Beijing City

but it is not an effective management measure to control the urban road surface runoff water

when used alone.

关键词

Keywords

references

Office of Research and Development Washington. The Use of Best Management Practices(BMPs) in Urban Watersheds[M].Washington:United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2004.

Chang C L, Lo S L, Huang S M. Optimal strategies for best management practice placement in a synthetic watershed[J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2009,153(1/2/3/4):359-364.

Marla C M, Lee So-young, Lee-Hyung Kim. Long-term monitoring of infiltration trench for nonpoint source pollution control[J]. Water Air Soil Pollut, 2010(212):13-26.

Jia Haifeng, Lu Yuwen, Chen Yurong, et al. Planning of LID-BMPs for urban runoff control:The case of Beijing Olympic village[J].Separation and Purification Technology, 2012,84(9):112-119.

张新鑫.BMPs技术及其在我国城市绿地中的应用研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2012.

许学珍.北京市流动人口对经济增长影响的实证研究[D].北京:首都经济贸易大学,2013.

Qiu Jane. Urbanization contributed to Beijing storms[J].Nature, 2012(10):1038.

范旸.高速城市化进程对北京地区水化学特征的影响及北京水安全评价初探[D].北京:首都师范大学,2009.

郭婧,马琳,史鑫源,等.北京城市道路降雨径流监测与分析[J].环境化学学报,2011,30(10):1814-1815.

Yousef Y A, Wanielista M P, Harper H H. Removal of Highway Contaminants by Roadside Swales[R].Transportation Research Board, Washington DC,1985.

顾孝天,李宁,周扬,等.北京"7·21"暴雨引发的城市内涝灾害防御思考[J].自然灾害学报,2013,22(2):1-6.

车武,李俊奇.城市雨水利用技术与管理[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2006.

Richard A, Claytor, Thomas R. Design of Stormwater Filtering Systems[M].America:The Center for Watershed Protection,2006.

陈兴福,杨文钰,刘文昌.麦冬生长特性及其与产量的相关性研究[J].中国中药杂志,2006,31(14):1141-1143.

张书函,孟莹莹,陈建刚,等.城市机动车道路面初期效应及初期径流弃除量探讨[J].环境科学与技术,2011,34(9):100-104.

渤海峰,刘国彬,王国梁.黄土丘陵区退耕地植被恢复过程中土壤入渗特征的变化[J].水土保持通报,2007,27(5):1-5.

王健,尹炜,叶闽,等.植草沟技术在面源污染控制中的研究进展[J].环境科学与技术,2011,34(5):90-94.

Mohamed M A K, Lucke T, Boogaard F. Preliminary investigation into the pollution reduction performance of swales used in a stormwater treatment train[J].Water Science & Technology, 2014,69(5):1014-1020.

张新颖.浅草沟系统对城市暴雨径流的控制试验研究[D].重庆:重庆大学,2008.

Lee Jungmin, Hyun Kyounghak, Choi Jongsoo. Analysis of the impact of low impact development on runoff from a new district in Korea[J]. Water Science & Technology, 2013, 68(6):1315-1321.

Deletic A, Fletcher T D. Performance of grass filters used for stormwater treatment:A field and modeling study[J].Journal of Hydrology, 2006,317(3):261-275.

王书吉,姚兰,任晓力.城市沥青道路路面产流规律分析研究[J].节水灌溉, 2007(5):51-53.

Davis A P, Stagge J H, Jamil E, et al. Hydraulic performance of grass swales for managing highway runoff[J].Water Research, 2012,46(20):6775-6786.

Chahar B R, Graillot D, Gaur S. Storm Water Management through Infiltration Trenches[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 2012, 138(3):274-281.

Liao Zhengliang, He Ying, Huang Fei, et al. Analysis on LID for highly urbanized areas' water logging control:Demonstrated on the example of Caohejing in Shanghai[J]. Water Science & Technology,2013,68(12):2559-2567.

浏览量

1796

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

贵州省煤矸石堆场径流污染特征及其对溪流水质的影响

不同类型水源保护林水资源保护功能的分析和评价

黄土高原水土保持生态环境建设生态效益监测方法探讨

长江三峡花岗岩地区优先流对渗流和地表径流的作用

紫色土丘陵区典型坡地产流及产沙模拟试验研究