1. 宁夏农林科学院荒漠化治理研究所,宁夏,银川,750002
2. 宁夏大学西北退化生态系统恢复与重建教育部重点实验室/西北土地退化与生态恢复省部共建国家重点实验室培育基地/西部生态与生物资源开发联合研究中心,宁夏,银川,750021
纸质出版:2015
移动端阅览
季波, 何建龙, 李娜, 等. 宁夏贺兰山主要森林树种的含碳率分析[J]. 水土保持通报, 2015,35(2):332-335.
JI Bo, HE Jianlong, LI Na, et al. Carbon Content Rate Analysis in Main Tree Species of Forest in Helan Mountain of Ningxia Area[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2015, 35(2): 332-335.
季波, 何建龙, 李娜, 等. 宁夏贺兰山主要森林树种的含碳率分析[J]. 水土保持通报, 2015,35(2):332-335. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2015.02.062.
JI Bo, HE Jianlong, LI Na, et al. Carbon Content Rate Analysis in Main Tree Species of Forest in Helan Mountain of Ningxia Area[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2015, 35(2): 332-335. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2015.02.062.
[目的] 分析宁夏自治区贺兰山自然保护区4种主要森林树种青海云杉、油松、灰榆、山杨不同器官的含碳率
为更大区域森林碳储量研究提供参考。[方法] 通过实地调查取样、室内实验测定及生物量资料对这4种主要林分地上部分平均含碳率进行了测定分析。[结果] 宁夏贺兰山4种主要森林树种青海云杉、油松、山杨和灰榆
林分的地上部平均含碳率分别为:0.4576
0.5184
0.4664和0.4390。同一树种不同组分间的变异系数在1.30%~2.57%间
相同组分的变异系数在0.62%~1.92%间;不同树种不同组分变异系数在0.89%~5.68%间
不同树种相同组分变异系数在4.87%~13.37%间。[结论] 不同森林类型林分含碳率不同。针叶树种各器官的平均含碳率高于阔叶树种
相应的针叶林分的平均含碳率也高于阔叶林。
[Objective] This paper aimed to quantify the carbon content rate(CCR) of different organs of four main tree species (Picea crassifolia
Pinus tabuliformis
Populus davidiana and Ulmus glaucescens)of forest in Helan Mountain
in order to provide reference for study of carbon storage in larger scale regional forest.[Methods] CCR of above-ground part was measured using the methods of the field investigation
laboratory assay and the links of it with biomass were analyzed with corresponding coupled biomass data.[Results] The results showed that the values of CCR of above-ground part of four tree speices
Picea crassifolia
Pinus tabulaeformis
Populus davidiana and Ulmus glaucescens were 0.457 6
0.518 4
0.421 3 and 0.439 0
respectively. In a same tree species
the variation coefficients of different modules were between 1.30% and 2.57%
the values of same module were between 0.62% and 1.92%; the variation coefficients of different modules among the four different trees were between 0.89% and 5.68%
the coefficients of same module of the four different tress ranged between 4.87% and 13.37%.[Conclusion] Different tree species have different carbon CCR. The average CCR in the organs of coniferous species was higher than that in the broadleaf species. Accordingly
the average CCR in the coniferous forest was higher than that in the broadleaf forest.
薛立,薛晔,列淦文,等.不同坡位杉木林土壤碳储量研究[J].水土保持通报,2012,32(6):43-46.
Reay D S. Climate change for the masses[J]. Nature, 2008,452(7183):31.
IPCC. Land Use, Land-use Change, and Forestry:A Special Report of the IPCC[M]. New York:Cambriage University Press, 2000.
许浩,张源润,胡天华,等.宁夏贺兰山自然保护区油松林碳储量及分布格局[J].生态环境学报,2013,22(11):1785-1789.
黄从德,张健,杨万勤,等.四川省及重庆地区森林植被碳储量动态[J].生态学报,2008,28(3):966-975.
王金亮,王小花,岳彩荣,等.滇西北香格里拉森林4个建群种的含碳率[J].生态环境学报,2012,21(4):613-619.
朱源,康慕谊.贺兰山灰榆群落的种间关联、排序及分类研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2012,26(4):160-165.
王斌,周志宇,张冈.贺兰山西坡不同海拔梯度上土壤-植物系统磷相关性的研究[J].安徽农业科学,2009,37(35):17630-17634,17674.
鲁如坤.土壤农业化学分析方法[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社,2000:229-237.
程堂仁.甘肃小陇山森林生物量及碳储量研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2007.
刘维,张晓丽,马菁.鹫峰国家森林公园主要乔木树种含碳率分析[J].西北林学院学报,2011,26(5):214-218.
马钦彦,陈遐林,王娟,等.华北主要森林类型建群种的含碳率分析[J].北京林业大学学报,2002,24(5/6):96-100.
王金叶,车克钧,蒋志荣.祁连山青海云杉林碳平衡研究[J].西北林学院学报,2000,15(1):9-14.
0
浏览量
1208
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621