1. 衡阳师范学院资源环境与旅游管理系,湖南,衡阳,421008
2. 湖南衡阳市气象局,湖南,衡阳,421001
纸质出版:2015
移动端阅览
刘兰芳, 肖志成, 陈涛, 等. 2013年中国南方地区农业旱灾风险评估——以湖南省衡阳市为例[J]. 水土保持通报, 2015,35(2):274-278.
LIU Lanfang, XIAO Zhicheng, CHEN Tao, et al. Assessment of Agricultural Drought Risk in Southern China in 2013 -A Case Study in Hengyang City, Hu'nan Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2015, 35(2): 274-278.
刘兰芳, 肖志成, 陈涛, 等. 2013年中国南方地区农业旱灾风险评估——以湖南省衡阳市为例[J]. 水土保持通报, 2015,35(2):274-278. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2015.02.052.
LIU Lanfang, XIAO Zhicheng, CHEN Tao, et al. Assessment of Agricultural Drought Risk in Southern China in 2013 -A Case Study in Hengyang City, Hu'nan Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2015, 35(2): 274-278. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2015.02.052.
[目的] 对南方典型区域的旱灾风险进行评估
为南方防旱减灾决策提供依据。[方法] 运用降水标准化指数法(SPI)对2013年湖南省衡阳市干旱危险性进行评价
构建评估指标体系
借助数学模型评估旱灾脆弱性。[结果] 衡阳县、祁东县为特旱
衡东县、衡南县、常宁市、耒阳市属于重旱区
衡山县为中旱区。选择降水量、水利化程度等8个指标体系
并构建数学模型计算衡阳市7个县域水田系统旱灾脆弱度。水田系统旱灾脆弱度以衡南县最大
为0.627
耒阳市最小
为0.429;衡阳县、衡南县、祁东县、常宁市为高度脆弱区
衡山县、衡东县、耒阳市是低度脆弱区。[结论] 综合干旱危险性与水田系统脆弱性来看
衡阳市西部农业旱灾风险高于东部农业旱灾风险。
[Objective] The prior work of drought risk assessment taken Hengyang City as a typical region in Southern China was conducted to guide the consequent drought-control decision-making.[Methods] The standardized precipitation index was used to assess the drought risk in Hengyang City of Hu'nan Province in 2013. The mathematical model is built to calculate the drought vulnerability in the city by selecting indicator system.[Results] The drought risk of Hengyang City was sub-zoned as followings:extreme drought subzone includes Hengyang and Qidong Counties; severe drought subzone includes Hengdong
Hengnan
Changning and Leiyang Counties
and Hengshan County is in the moderate drought subzone. After that
eight indicators as precipitation
the degree of irrigation
and etc. were used to calculate the drought vulnerability of the paddy filed system in seven counties of Hengyang City with a mathematical method. The drought vulnerability of the paddy filed system in Hengnan County has the maximum valueas(0.627)
Leiyang County has the minimum value(0.429). The counties of Hengyang
Hengnan
Changning and Qidong are highly vulnerable areas and the counties of Hengshan
Hengdong and Leiyang belong to low vulnerable areas.[Conclusion]The western counties of Hengyang City may potentially undergo more frequent and greater drought risk than the western counties when both drought risk and the vulnerability of the paddy filed system were considered.
贾慧聪,王静爱.国内外不同尺度的旱灾风险评价研究进展[J].自然灾害学报,2011,20(2):138-145.
梁书民.中国雨养农业区旱灾风险综合评价研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2011,25(7):39-44.
何斌,武建军,吕爱锋.农业干旱风险研究进展[J].地理科学进展,2010,29(5):557-564.
薛昌颖,霍治国,李世奎.北方冬小麦干旱灾损风险区[J].自然灾害学报,2003,12(1):131-139.
张文宗,赵春雷,康西言,等.河北省冬小麦旱灾风险评估和区划方法研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2009,23(2):10-16.
许凯,徐翔宇,李爱花,等.基于概率统计方法的承德市农业旱灾风险评估[J].农业工程学报,2013(14):139-146.
孙才志,张翔.基于信息扩散技术的辽宁省农业旱灾风险评价[J].农业系统科学与综合研究,2008,24(2):507-510.
Long Xin, Zhen Lin, Cheng Shengkui, et al. Quantitative assessment and spatial characteristics of agricultural drought risk in the Jinghe Watershed, Northwestern China[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2011,2(4):338-344.
郗蒙浩,赵秋红,姚忠.基于模糊理论的农业旱灾风险评估:以山西省阳泉市为例[J].自然灾害学报,2013,22(1):153-158.
商彦蕊,史培军.人为因素在农业旱灾形成过程中所起作用探讨:以河南省农业旱灾脆弱性为例[J].自然灾害学报,1998,7(4):35-43.
吴卫熊,黎瑞杰,何令祖.广西大石山区农业旱灾脆弱性及抗旱措施研究[J].亚热带水土保持,2011(1):15-18.
刘兰芳,关欣,唐云松.农业旱灾脆弱性评价及生态减灾研究:以湖南省衡阳市为例[J].水土保持通报,2005,25(1):69-73.
Blaikie P, Cannon T, Davis I, et al. At Risk:Natural Hazards, People's Vulnerability, and Disasters[M]. London and New York:Routledge Publishers,1994.
中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会. GB/T20481-2006 气象干旱等级[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2006.
0
浏览量
1225
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621