1. 北京林业大学省部共建森林培育与保护教育部重点实验室,北京,100083
2. 河北省平泉县林业局, 河北平泉,067500
纸质出版:2015
移动端阅览
宋小帅, 康峰峰, 韩海荣, 等. 辽河源典型森林类型的土壤水文效应[J]. 水土保持通报, 2015,35(2):101-105.
SONG Xiaoshuai, KANG Fengfeng, HAN Hairong, et al. Soil Hydrological Effects of Typical Forest Types in Upper Reaches of Liaohe River[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2015, 35(2): 101-105.
宋小帅, 康峰峰, 韩海荣, 等. 辽河源典型森林类型的土壤水文效应[J]. 水土保持通报, 2015,35(2):101-105. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2015.02.019.
SONG Xiaoshuai, KANG Fengfeng, HAN Hairong, et al. Soil Hydrological Effects of Typical Forest Types in Upper Reaches of Liaohe River[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2015, 35(2): 101-105. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2015.02.019.
[目的
]
研究辽河源地区典型森林类型林下土壤的水文效应
为辽河源森林生态系统健康的监测和评价提供理论佐证。[方法
]
选取典型森林类型
采用不同入渗模型拟合各森林类型土壤的入渗过程。[结果
]
(1)土壤容重变化范围为1.21~1.56 g/cm
3
油松中龄林最大
山杨成熟林最小;土壤总孔隙度变化范围为41.26%~54.38%
山杨成熟林最大
油松中龄林最小;(2)山杨成熟林土壤蓄水能力最强
为1087.56 t/hm
2
;油松中龄林土壤蓄水能力最小
为825.17 t/hm
2
;(3)山杨成熟林稳渗速率最大
为1.33 mm/min;(4)霍顿(Horton)入渗模型和菲利普(Philip)入渗模型能较好地反映各森林群落土壤入渗过程
但通用幂函数模型拟合结果较差。[结论
]
不同森林类型土壤均表现出随着土层深度的增加容重逐渐增加的现象
阔叶林林下土壤蓄水能力要强于针叶林
通过比较认为可以利用霍顿(Horton)模型作为研究该区森林土壤水文功能的重要手段。
[Objective] Studying the hydrological effects of understory soil of typical forest types in the upper reaches of Liaohe River
aimed to provide theoretical evidence for the monitoring and evaluation of the forest ecosystem health.[Methods] The understory soils of some typical forest types were chosen to research their infiltration processes
and upon which the processes were fitted with several permeability models.[Results](1) The soil bulk density ranged from about 1.21 g/cm3 to 1.56 g/cm3
the maximum value was found in the middle-aged Pinus tabuliformisforest and maturePopulus davidianaforest had the minimum bulk density. The range of the total soil porosity was 41.26%~54.38%
mature Populus davidiana forest had the maximum porosity and middle-aged Pinus tabuliformis had the minimum porosity; (2) The soil water-holding capacity of mature Populus davidiana forest was greatest with a value of 1 087.56 t/hm2 and middle-aged Pinus tabulaeformis forest had the minimum value of 825.17 t/hm2; (3) The steady infiltration rate of mature Populus davidiana forest was 1.33 mm/min; (4) Both Horton infiltration model and Philip model could reflect the soil infiltration course of each forest vegetation well
while the common power functional infiltration performed poorly.[Conclusion] The soils of different forest types had greater bulk density in deeper layer. The soil water storage capacity was bigger under broad-leaved forest than that under under coniferous forest. Horton model could be used as an important means to study the local hydrological function of forest soil.
王树力,胡天然.松花江干流四种珍贵树种阔叶林的土壤水文特性[J].土壤通报,2010,41(2):294-298.
田超,杨新兵,李军,等.冀北山地不同海拔蒙古栎林枯落物和土壤水文效应[J].水土保持学报,2011,25(4):221-226.
刘道平,陈三雄,张金池,等.浙江安吉主要林地类型土壤渗透性[J].应用生态学报,2007,18(3):494-498.
余新晓,程根伟.长江上游亚高山暗针叶林土壤水分入渗特征研究[J].应用生态学报,2003,14(1):16-19.
刘世荣,孙鹏森,温远光.中国主要森林生态系统水文功能的比较研究[J].植物生态学报,2003,27(1):16-22.
Horton R E. An approach toward a physical interpretation of infiltration-capacity[J]. Soil science society of America Journal, 1940, 5(3):399-417.
Philip J R. The theory of infiltration about sorptivity and algebraic infiltration equations[J]. Soil Science, 1957, 84(4):257-264.
刘霞,张光灿,李雪蕾,等.小流域生态修复过程中不同森林植被土壤入渗与贮水特征[J].水土保持学报,2004,18(6):1-5.
胡建朋,杨吉华,罗明达,等.山东石灰岩山地不同林分类型土壤入渗特征研究[J].水土保持学报,2011,25(3):54-58.
杨海龙,朱金兆,毕利东.三峡库区森林流域生态系统土壤渗透性能的研究[J].水土保持学报,2003,17(3):63-69.
李小雁,马育军.水文土壤学:-门新兴的交叉学科[J].科技导报,2008,26(9):78-82.
张光灿,夏江宝,王贵霞,等.鲁中花岗岩山区人工林土壤水分物理性质[J].水土保持学报,2005,19(6):44-48.
王光玉.杉木混交林水源涵养和土壤性质研究[J].林业科学,2003,39(1):15-20.
孙向阳.土壤学[M].北京.中国林业出版社,2005.
张雷燕,刘常富,王彦辉,等.宁夏六盘山地区不同森林类型土壤的蓄水和渗透能力比较[J].水土保持学报,2007,21(1):95-98.
孙艳红,张洪江,程金花,等.缙云山不同林地类型土壤特性及其水源涵养功能[J].水土保持学报,2006,20(2):106-109.
陈波,杨新兵,赵心苗,等.冀北山地6种天然纯林枯落物及土壤水文效应[J].水土保持学报,2012,26(2):196-202.
姜海燕,赵雨森,陈祥伟,等.大兴安岭岭南几种主要森林类型土壤水文功能研究[J].水土保持学报,2007,21(3):149-153.
0
浏览量
1312
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621