两种巨桉人工林地土壤抗蚀性的比较研究

余晓章; 魏鹏; 范川; 王谢; 张腾飞; 沈卫

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2015.02.012

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

两种巨桉人工林地土壤抗蚀性的比较研究

试验研究

- 两种巨桉人工林地土壤抗蚀性的比较研究
- Comparative Study of Soil Anti-erodibility Between Two Kinds of Eucalyptus Grandis Plantations
- 水土保持通报 2015年35卷第2期页码：58-63
- 作者机构：
  
  四川农业大学林学院,四川,雅安,625014
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  国家"十二五"科技支撑项目"长江上游低山丘陵区生态综合整治技术与示范"(2011BAC09B05);四川省科技支撑计划项目(2010NZ0049)
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2015.02.012
  中图分类号：
- 纸质出版：2015
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
余晓章, 魏鹏, 范川, 等. 两种巨桉人工林地土壤抗蚀性的比较研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2015,35(2):58-63.

YU Xiaozhang, WEI Peng, FAN Chuan, et al. Comparative Study of Soil Anti-erodibility Between Two Kinds of Eucalyptus Grandis Plantations[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2015, 35(2): 58-63.
余晓章, 魏鹏, 范川, 等. 两种巨桉人工林地土壤抗蚀性的比较研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2015,35(2):58-63. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2015.02.012.

YU Xiaozhang, WEI Peng, FAN Chuan, et al. Comparative Study of Soil Anti-erodibility Between Two Kinds of Eucalyptus Grandis Plantations[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2015, 35(2): 58-63. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2015.02.012.

摘要

[目的] 揭示巨桉人工林组培苗和实生苗两种起源对土壤抗蚀性的影响。[方法] 利用S形采样法在样地内采集多个样点

按上(0-10 cm)

中(10-20 cm)

下(20-30 cm)三层分别利用环刀和塑料盒采集原状土壤

测定不同层次土壤容重、非毛管孔隙度、毛管孔隙度、总孔隙度、渗透速率、水稳性团聚体含量等。[结果] (1)随着土壤深度增加

两种巨桉林地土壤容重呈现递增趋势

而总孔隙度和通气孔隙度呈递减趋势。组培巨桉林土壤容重低于实生苗巨桉林地

而土壤总孔隙度、通气孔隙度高于显著实生苗巨桉林地(p<0.05);(2)随着土壤深度增加

两种巨桉林地土壤水稳性指数、抗蚀指数、团聚状况、团聚度和结构系数呈现下降趋势

水稳性指数和抗蚀指数达到显著水平(p<0.05)

而分散率和分散系数呈现升高趋势。组培巨桉林地不同土层的抗蚀指数和结构系数均高于实生苗巨桉林地

但分散系数均显著低于实生苗巨桉林地(p<0.05);(3)随着土壤深度增加

两种巨桉林地土壤各粒径水稳性团聚体含量和平均重量直径(MWD)呈现出下降趋势

土壤结构体破坏率呈现上升趋势。组培苗巨桉林地不同土层各粒径(>5 mm;5~2 mm;0.5~0.25 mm; >0.5 mm; >0.25 mm)水稳性团聚体含量和MWD均高于实生苗林地

而结构体破坏率、2~1 mm和1~0.5 mm水稳性团聚体含量均低于实生苗巨桉林地。[结论] 组培巨桉人工林的土壤抗蚀性更佳。

Abstract

[Objective] To research the effects of two seedlings[tissue culture seedling(P1) and seed seedling(P2)] of Eucalyptus grandis plantation on soil anti-erodibility.[Methods] Soil samples of 0-10c m

10-20 cm and 20-30 cm were collected with ring-knife and plastic box to determine the index as soil bulk density

non-capillary porosity

capillary porosity

total porosity

soil aeration porosity and water stable aggregates content

etc.[Results] The soil bulk density in the two seedling plantation lands increased at the downward soil profiles

while total porosity and soil aeration porosity decreased with the increase of soil depth. The soil bulk density in P1 was significantly lower than that in P2. The total porosity and soil aeration porosity in P1 were significantly higher than those in P2. Water stable index

soil erosion resistance

aggregate condition

aggregate degree and structure coefficient in the two kinds of plantations decreased with the increase of soil depth

while the soil dispersion rate and dispersion coefficient increased. The water stability and resistance to corrosion index were both significantly different at the 0.05 level. Soil erosion resistance and structure coefficient in P1 were higher than those in P2

while the dispersion coefficient was lower than that in P2. Contents of water-stable aggregate in all size and MWD(mean weight diameter) in both plantations decreased with the increase of soil depth

while soil structure damage rate increased. Contents of water-stable aggregate in different size(>5 mm

5~2 mm

0.5~0.25 mm

>0.5 mm

>0.25 mm) and MWDS in P1 were higher than those in P2

while the structure damage rate

and water-stable aggregate in sizes of 2~1 mm and 1~0.5 mm in P1 were lower than those in P2.[Conclusion] Soil anti-erodibility in P1 was higher than that in P2

in the present study condition.

关键词

Keywords

references

王云琦,王玉杰,朱金兆.重庆缙云山典型林分林地土壤抗蚀性分析[J].长江流域资源与环境,2005,14(6):775-780.

刘旦旦,张鹏辉,王健,等.黄土坡面不同土地利用类型土壤抗蚀性对比[J].林业科学,2013,49(9):102-106.

任改,张洪江,程金花,等.重庆四面山几种人工林地土壤抗蚀性分析[J].水土保持学报,2009,23(3):20-24.

董慧霞,李贤伟,张健,等.退耕地三倍体毛白杨林地土壤抗蚀性研究[J].水土保持通报,2009,28(6):45-48.

潘树林,辜彬,杨晓亮.土壤抗蚀性及评价研究进展[J].宜宾学院学报,2011,11(12):101-104.

王俭成,杨建英,史常青,等.北川地区典型林分土壤抗蚀性分析[J].水土保持学报,2013,27(1):71-75.

黄进,杨会,张金池.桐庐生态公益林主要林分类型土壤抗蚀性研究[J].水土保持学报,2010,24(1):49-52.

吴鹏,朱军,崔迎春,等.黔中杠寨小流域不同植被类型土壤抗蚀性研究[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2012,32(8):64-70.

丛日亮,黄进,张金池,等.苏南丘陵区主要林分类型土壤抗蚀性分析[J].生态环境学报,2010,19(8):1862-1867.

Manning A D, Fischer J, Lindenmayer D B. Scattered trees are keystone structures-implications for conservation[J]. Biological Conservation, 2006,132(3):311-321.

林亚丽,张文春.巨桉无性系(组培苗)造林推广试验初报[J].四川林勘设计,2006(2):49-50.

蓝贺胜,曹汉洋,黄秀美,等.巨桉家系与无性系造林对比试验初报[J].桉树科技,2009,26(2):32-35.

吴培衍.巨尾桉优良无性系组培苗与扦插苗的造林效果[J].亚热带农业研究,2006,2(2):94-96.

石长金,刘和民.水土保持产业化经营的理论与模型研究[J].农业系统科学与综合研究,1999,15(3):209-212.

丁文峰,李占斌.土壤抗蚀性的研究动态[J].水土保持科技情报,2001,1(1):36-39.

Whalen J K, Hu Q, Liu A. Compost applications increase water-stable aggregates in conventional and no-tillage systems[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2003, 67(6):1842-1847.

史东梅,吕刚,蒋光毅,等.马尾松林地土壤物理性质变化及抗蚀性研究[J].水土保持学报,2005,19(6):35-39.

赵洋毅,周运超,段旭,等.黔中喀斯特地区不同植被土壤抗蚀性研究[J].农业现代化研究,2007,28(5):633-636.

牛芳华,李志辉,王昌熙,等.尾巨桉幼苗根系分布及生物量特征研究[J].中国农学通报,2012,28(1):6-11.

罗柳娟,韦理电,何斌,等.尾巨桉和厚荚相思人工林水源涵养功能研究[J].华南农业大学学报,2012,33(2):220-224.

廖建良.组培苗无性系巨尾桉营林技术[J].惠州大学学报,1997(4):119-121.

董慧霞,李贤伟,张健,等.不同草本层三倍体毛白杨林地土壤抗蚀性研究[J].水土保持学报,2005,19(3):70-74.

吴彦,刘世全,付秀琴,等.植物根系提高土壤水稳性团粒含量的研究[J].土壤侵蚀与水土保持学报,1997,3(1):45-49.

浏览量

1137

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

黄土丘陵沟壑区人工林地的土壤抗蚀性评价

退耕地三倍体毛白杨林地土壤抗蚀性研究

种植苎麻对南方坡耕地土壤抗蚀性的影响

不同混交模式毛竹林下土壤抗侵蚀性研究

上舍流域两种林地土壤结构与抗蚀性