湘赣边界山区林地土壤养分分异规律

魏志红; 姜小三; 黄耀欢; 庄大方; 戴守政; 李飞

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2015.01.063

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

湘赣边界山区林地土壤养分分异规律

试验研究

- 湘赣边界山区林地土壤养分分异规律
- Spatial Variation of Forest Soil Nutrient in Hu'nan-Jiangxi Boundary Mountain Areas
- 水土保持通报 2015年35卷第1期页码：349-355
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 南京农业大学, 资源与环境科学学院,江苏,南京,210095
  2. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,北京,100101
  3. 青海省生态环境遥感监测中心,青海,西宁,810000
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  科技基础性工作专项"我国南方丘陵山区综合科学考察"(SQ2012FY4910045);国家自然科学青年基金项目"基于GRACE陆地水储量变化反演的西南五省干旱监测研究"(51309210);青海省科学技术厅科技基础条件平台建设计划"青海省可可西里国家级自然保护区天地一体化综合监测平台研发"(2013-T-Y28)
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2015.01.063
  中图分类号：
- 纸质出版：2015
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
魏志红, 姜小三, 黄耀欢, 等. 湘赣边界山区林地土壤养分分异规律[J]. 水土保持通报, 2015,35(1):349-355.

WEI Zhihong, JIANG Xiaosan, HUANG Yaohuan, et al. Spatial Variation of Forest Soil Nutrient in Hu'nan-Jiangxi Boundary Mountain Areas[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2015, 35(1): 349-355.
魏志红, 姜小三, 黄耀欢, 等. 湘赣边界山区林地土壤养分分异规律[J]. 水土保持通报, 2015,35(1):349-355. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2015.01.063.

WEI Zhihong, JIANG Xiaosan, HUANG Yaohuan, et al. Spatial Variation of Forest Soil Nutrient in Hu'nan-Jiangxi Boundary Mountain Areas[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2015, 35(1): 349-355. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2015.01.063.

摘要

[目的] 对湘赣边界山区林地在不同海拔高度及植被类型影响下的土壤养分特征和空间分异规律进行研究

为林地土壤的合理利用及培肥提供依据。[方法] 采集林地表层土壤

测得各养分指标含量

运用修正的内梅罗综合指数法和变异系数法

对该区土壤综合肥力和空间变异性进行评价。[结果] (1)试验区土壤整体呈酸性

有机质和全氮养分含量较高

但普遍缺乏速效养分(磷、钾)。(2)随着从丘陵、低山到中山海拔等级的升高

土壤有机质、全氮、速效磷含量及综合肥力系数不断增加;pH值、有机质、全氮的空间变异性不断减小。(3)不同林地生态系统覆被下土壤综合肥力表现为:灌木林>针阔混交林>毛竹林>阔叶林>针叶林;空间变异性规律为:灌木林 >针叶林 >毛竹林 >阔叶林 >针阔混交林。(4)人工林的土壤有机质、全氮、速效钾、pH值及土壤综合肥力都低于天然林。[结论] 中山海拔等级林地、针阔混交林、天然林对维持良好的土壤养分状况具有更大潜力。

Abstract

[Objective] To improve the studies on ecological conditions

utilization

and protection of forest resources

the soil spatial variation and the spatial distribution of sample sites in forest of Hu'nan-Jiangxi boundary mountain areas were analyzed.[Methods] The soil nutrient content was measured

and the comprehensive advantage of soil nutrients was evaluated by the changed Nemero formula

the soil spatial variability was evaluated by the coefficient of variation(CV).[Results] (1) Soils of the experimental region were characterized as acidic and had high values of soil organic matter(SOM) and soil total nitrogen(STN) generally

but were all lack of soil available phosphorus(SAP) and soil available potassium(SAK)nutrients

(2) With the rise of elevation level of hill

low mountain

middle mountain

the values of soil pH

SOM

STN

SAP and comprehensive fertility coefficient increased

but the spatial variation of soil pH

SOM and STN decreased. (3) According to the different forest types

the comprehensive advantage of soil nutrients were made as follow:shrubs> the mixed forest> Phyllostarchys pubescens forest> broad-leaved forest> coniferous forest

the order of the spatial variation were:shrubs> coniferous forest> P. pubescens forest> broad-leaved forest> the mixed forest. (4) All the soil nutrient indicators of natural forest

except the SAP

were higher than that of plantation.[Conclusion] The forest in middle mountain

mixed forest and natural forest have more potential to maintain good soil nutrient status in the study area.

关键词

Keywords

references

Heuvelink G, Webster R. Modelling soil variation:past, present, and future[J]. Geoderma, 2001,100(3):269-301.

Lin H, Wheeler D, Bell J, et al.Assessment of soil spatial variability at multiple scales[J]. Ecological Modelling, 2005,182(3):271-290.

杨晓娟,王海燕,刘玲,等.吉林省东部低山丘陵区4种林分类型林地的土壤肥力分析[J].水土保持通报,2013,33(4):142-148.

李明辉,彭少麟,申卫军,等.丘塘景观植被恢复与土壤养分空间分异规律研究[J].农业工程学报,2005,21(S):72-75.

吕世丽,李新平,李文斌,等.牛背梁自然保护区不同海拔高度森林土壤养分特征分析[J].西北农林科技大学学报:自然科学版,2013,41(4):161-168.

张忠华,胡刚,祝介东,等.喀斯特森林土壤养分的空间异质性及其对树种分布的影响[J].植物生态学报,2011,35(10):1038-1049.

Lauber C L, Strickland M S, Bradford M A, et al. The influence of soil properties on the structure of bacterial and fungal communities across land-use types[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2008,40(9):2407-2415.

Sayer E J, Wright S J, Tanner E V, et al. Variable responses of lowland tropical forest nutrient status to fertilization and litter manipulation[J]. Ecosystems, 2012,15(3):387-400.

Martinson G O, Corre M D, Veldkamp E. Responses of nitrous oxide fluxes and soil nitrogen cycling to nutrient additions in montane forests along an elevation gradient in Southern Ecuador[J]. Biogeochemistry, 2013,112(1/3):625-636.

蒋文伟,周国模,余树全,等.安吉山地主要森林类型土壤养分状况的研究[J].水土保持学报,2004,18(4):73-76.

罗歆,代数,何丙辉,等.缙云山不同植被类型林下土壤养分含量及物理性质研究[J].水土保持学报,2011,25(1):64-69.

孙艳红,张洪江,程金花,等.缙云山不同林地类型土壤特性及其水源涵养功能[J].水土保持学报,2006,20(2):106-109.

张巧明,王得祥,龚明贵,等.秦岭火地塘林区不同海拔森林土壤理化性质[J].水土保持学报,2011,25(5):69-73.

阙文杰,吴启堂.一个定量综合评价土壤肥力的方法初探[J].土壤通报,1994,25(96):245-247.

Nielsen D R, Bouma J. Soil Spatial Variability[M]. Pudoc:Wageningen, 1985.

全国土壤普查办公室.中国土壤[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2002.

刘振东,陈志明,于秀波.中国地貌全国研制[J].地图,1995(1):36-38.

林克惠.土壤中磷的固定以及施用石灰和有机质对磷的有效性的影响[J].土壤通报,1963(5):22-26.

程先富,史学正,于东升,等.丘陵山区林地土壤养分状况研究:以江西省兴国县为例[J].水土保持学报,2003,17(2):28-30.

李海涛,于贵瑞,李家永.井冈山森林凋落物分解动态及磷、钾释放速率[J].应用生态学报,2007,18(2):233-240.

浏览量

1214

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

典型黄土区人工林土壤水分与养分的区域特征

不同利用类型土地改为耕地后土壤养分的变化

陕西省子洲县5种人工林类型不同土层土壤养分及化学计量学特征

颗粒状白酒污泥对土壤养分及重金属含量的影响

广西大瑶山森林土壤养分随海拔梯度的变化