山西大学环境与资源学院,山西,太原,030006
纸质出版:2015
移动端阅览
王晓军, 武江涛, 王兵, 等. 基于影像分析的黄土丘陵沟壑区土壤水分采样研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2015,35(1):181-186.
WANG Xiaojun, WU Jiangtao, WANG Bing, et al. A Study on Image-based Soil Moisture Sampling Method in Hilly and Gully Area of Loess Plateau[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2015, 35(1): 181-186.
王晓军, 武江涛, 王兵, 等. 基于影像分析的黄土丘陵沟壑区土壤水分采样研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2015,35(1):181-186. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2015.01.034.
WANG Xiaojun, WU Jiangtao, WANG Bing, et al. A Study on Image-based Soil Moisture Sampling Method in Hilly and Gully Area of Loess Plateau[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2015, 35(1): 181-186. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2015.01.034.
[目的] 以山西省寿阳县三眼井小流域土壤水分采样为例
对采样点进行了均匀性和代表性分析
以此验证土壤采样设计的合理性。[方法] 利用统计分析SPSS 13.0软件和ArcGIS软件
以规则网格采样点作为初步布设图
然后结合遥感影像
把自动生成的规则网格采样点在兼顾土地利用类型和可操作性的前提下进行微调
即采用大均匀小随机布点法进行土壤采样点布设。[结果] 最近邻点指数和变异系数均显示采样点分布较均匀;从采样点的坡度代表性来看
由于大均匀小随机采样考虑到实际可操作性
采样点布设多集中在0°~15°
坡度的代表性较差;从采样点的坡向代表性来看
采样点代表性较好;从土地利用类型代表性来看
大均匀小随机法得到的采样点对草地与耕地的代表性较好
对林地的代表性较差
主要因为林地多分布在陡坡上难以采样。[结论] 总体来看
大均匀小随机采样法得到的样点均匀性和代表性都比较好
且由于黄土丘陵沟壑区沟壑纵横
地形复杂
利用此方法可以兼顾均匀性、代表性和可操作性。
[Objective] To test the rationality of soil sampling design
we took Sanyanjing basin of Shouyang county in Shanxi Province as a case study
to analyze the uniformity and representativeness of soil water sampling.[Methods] Using statistics analysis software and ArcGIS
we took grid sampling points as the initial layout. And then combined with remote sensing images
the automatic generated regular grid sampling points were finely adjusted giving the consideration of land use types and operation
namely
using uniform sampling in large scale and random sampling in small scale method for soil sampling point layout.[Results] Both of the nearest neighbor index and coefficient of variation showed a uniform distribution of sampling points. Sampling points obtained by uniform sampling in large scale and random sampling in small scale method were mainly concentrated in the slope of 0°~15°
which is not representative according to the distribution of slope. While the selected sampling points were representative according to the distribution of aspect. The points obtained by uniform sampling in large scale and random sampling in small scale method were more representative in grassland and farmland
but fewer representatives in forest land
due to the woodland is mainly distributed on steep slope and difficult to sample.[Conclusion] The uniformity and representativeness of sampling points obtained by large uniform small sample random sampling method are quite good. This sampling method can be well applied in hilly and gully area of the Loess Plateau to obtain uniform and representative sampling points.
王栓全,岳宏昌,王伟.黄土丘陵沟壑区不同土地类型的土壤水分特性[J].干旱地区农业研究,2009,27(6):93-96.
邝高明,朱清科,刘中奇,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区微地形对土壤水分及生物量的影响[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(3):74-77.
陈天恩,董静,陈立平,等.县域农田土壤采样布局多目标优化分析模型[J].农业工程学报,2012,28(23):67-73.
苏晓燕,赵永存,杨浩,等.不同釆样点数量下土壤有机质含量空间预测方法对比[J].地学前缘,2012,18(6):34-40.
李玲,陈伟强,江辉,等.3S在土壤布点与采样中的应用[J].中国农学通报,2007,23(6):388-391.
李翔,潘瑜春,赵春江,等.利用不同方法估测土壤有机质及其对采样数的敏感性分析[J].地理科学,2007,27(5):689-694.
李梅,张学雷,武继承.GIS支持下豫东地区土壤野外采样布点方法探索[J].土壤,2011,43(3):459-465.
Peigné J, Vian J F, Cannavacciuolo M, et al. Soil sampling based on field spatial variability of soil microbial indicators[J]. European Journal of Soil Biology, 2009(45):488-495.
Englund E, Weber D, Leviant N. The effects of sampling design parameters on block selection[J].Mathematical Geology, 1992,24(3):329-343.
苏晓燕.采样设计对土壤有机质含量空间预测精度的影响研究[D].南京:南京师范大学,2012.
申祥民,雷晓云,陈大春,等.不同布点方式的膜下滴灌棉田土壤水分的空间变异研究[J].新疆农业大学学报,2010,33(4):363-368.
姚丽贤,周修冲,蔡永发,等.不同采样密度下土壤特性的空间变异特征及其推估精度研究[J].土壤,2004,36(5):538-542.
Visschers R, Finke P A, De Gruijter J J. A soil sampling program for the Netherlands[J]. Geoderma,2007,139(1):60-72.
史志华,朱华德,陈佳,等.小流域土壤水分空间异质性及其与环境因子的关系[J].应用生态学报,2012,23(4):889-895.
白天路,杨勤科,申佳.黄土高原丘陵沟壑小流域土壤水分垂直分布变异特征及影响因子[J].生态杂志,2009,28(12):2508-2514.
闫健康.GIS支持的平原地区乡(镇)域村庄布点规划研究[D].郑州:河南大学,2007.
刘瑞民,杨志峰,沈珍瑶,等.基于DEM的长江上游土地利用分析[J].地理科学进展,2006,25(1):102-108.
汤国安,宋佳.基于DEM坡度图制图中坡度分级方法的比较研究[J].水土保持学报,2006,20(2):157-160.
赵牡丹,汤国安.黄土丘陵沟壑区不同坡度分级系统及地面坡谱对比[J].水土保持通报,2002,22(4):33-36.
0
浏览量
1493
下载量
3
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621