1. 忻州师范学院旅游管理系,山西,忻州,034000
2. 忻州师范学院地理系,山西,忻州,034000
3. 中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所, 陕西杨凌,712100
纸质出版:2015
移动端阅览
赵鹏宇, 冯文勇, 崔嫱, 等. 2004-2011年滹沱河忻州段水质变化及影响因素[J]. 水土保持通报, 2015,35(1):90-95.
ZHAO Pengyu, FENG Wenyong, CUI Qiang, et al. Surface Water Quality of Xinzhou Section of Hutuo River and Related Driving Factors During 2004-2011[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2015, 35(1): 90-95.
赵鹏宇, 冯文勇, 崔嫱, 等. 2004-2011年滹沱河忻州段水质变化及影响因素[J]. 水土保持通报, 2015,35(1):90-95. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2015.01.017.
ZHAO Pengyu, FENG Wenyong, CUI Qiang, et al. Surface Water Quality of Xinzhou Section of Hutuo River and Related Driving Factors During 2004-2011[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2015, 35(1): 90-95. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2015.01.017.
[目的] 研究2004-2011年滹沱河流域忻州段地表水水质的变化
并对影响水质变化的自然社会经济因素进行探讨。[方法] 利用2004-2011年的水质监测数据和有关的自然社会经济统计数据
采用有机污染综合指数方法。[结果] (1)滹沱河忻州段近8 a的地表水水质变化可分为持续恶化和快速改善两个阶段
2007年是水质变化趋势的转折点
两个阶段有机污染综合指数(T值)分别为5.51和2.85。(2)自然因素方面
河道水量、降水量与水质均呈负相关
相关系数分别为0.675
0.532(p<0.01)。河道水量、降水量对各河段水质改善作用有限。社会因素方面
水质恶化主要与工业废水排放量、施用化肥量、生活污水排放量、污水处理能力有关
相关系数分别为0.689(p<0.01)
0.633(p<0.01)
0.465(p<0.05)和0.905(p<0.01)。[结论] 2009年后虽然生活污水超过了工业废水排放
但污水处理厂的达标运行使河段水质进一步改善
污水处率是今后该地区水质持续改善的前提保障。经济发展与城镇化并未给水质带来压力
而且经济发展已成为改善水质的积极动力。
[Objective] To study the surface water quality changes of Xinzhou section of Hutuo River in past eight years and discuss the natural
social and economic factors that affect the water quality changes.[Methods] The water quality monitoring data and relative natural social and economic statistical data from 2004 to 2011 were used and the organic pollution comprehensive index method was adopt.[Results] (1) The surface water quality changes of Xinzhou section can be divided into consistently deteriorating and rapidly improving periods. The turning point of the water quality change was in 2007. And the organic pollution indexes(T) of the two periods were 5.51 and 2.85. (2) In terms of natural factors
the river water
precipitation were negatively correlated with the water quality
and the correlation coefficient were 0.675 and 0.532(p<0.01).The effect of river water and precipitation on the river water quality improvement was limited. For the social and economic factors
the water quality deterioration was mainly related to the industrial waste emissions
the amount of chemical fertilizers
the sewage emissions and the sewage treatment capacity. The correlative coefficient were 0.689(p<0.01)
0.633(p<0.01)
0.465(p<0.05)
0.905(p<0.01).[Conclusion] Although the sewage surpassed the industrial waste water discharge after 2009
the standard operation of sewage treatment plant further improved the river water quality. The sewage rate was the premise of continuous improvement to ensure water quality in the future at the region. The economic development and urbanization did not bring pressure to the water quality. And the economic development became the positive power.
韩晨霞,赵旭阳,李冬,等.滹沱河岗黄段湿地水污染及生态修复探讨[J].中国水土保持,2008(1):33-36.
韩晨霞,赵旭阳,李冬,等.滹沱河岗黄段湿地重金属污染的植物修复探讨[J].石家庄学院学报,2007,9(6):67-71.
王金哲,张光辉,聂振龙, 等. 滹沱河流域平原区人类活动对浅层地下水干扰程度量化研究[J]. 水土保持通报,2010,30(2):65-69.
孟令尧,史密伟.滹沱河流域本底状态地表水氮、磷非点源污染评价[J].地理与地理信息科学,2009,25(3):96-98.
张婷,刘静玲,王雪梅,等.白洋淀水质时空变化及影响因子评价与分析[J].环境科学学报,2010,30(2):46-50.
张勇,王云.上海市地表水水质近20 a的变化[J].环境科学学报,2002,22(2):247-251.
刘倩纯,余潮, 张杰,等.鄱阳湖水体水质变化特征分析[J].农业环境科学学报,2013,32(6):1232-1237.
曾凡棠,张修玉. 过去20 a东江水质演变趋势[J]. 环境科学导刊,2012,31(6):38-41
李国峰,刘宪斌, 刘占广,等.基于主成分分析和水质标识指数的天津地区主要河流水质评价[J].生态与农村环境学报,2007,27(4):27-31.
马月林.滹沱河灌区水利志[M].太原:山西人民出版社,2006.
宋颖.山西省水功能区划及水质状况分析[J].山西水利科技,2006,162(4):68-69.
李平社.忻州60 a发展回顾[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2008.
忻州市统计局.忻州统计年鉴2010[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2010.
忻州市统计局.忻州统计年鉴2011[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2011.
范堆相.山西省水资源评价[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2004:157-172.
张琼杰.山西省滹沱河水环境综合质量的马尔柯夫变化趋势研究[J].现代农业科技,2008(20):304-306.
曹建生,韩淑敏,杨永辉.滹沱河流域的水资源问题与对策[J].河北水利水电技术,2000(4):16-18.
0
浏览量
1564
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621