漓江水陆交错带不同立地类型草本植物根系特征

李青山; 王冬梅; 信忠保

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2014.06.049

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

漓江水陆交错带不同立地类型草本植物根系特征

试验研究

- 漓江水陆交错带不同立地类型草本植物根系特征
- Root System Characteristics of Herbaceous Plants at Different Sites of Aquatic-terrestrial Ecotone of Lijiang River
- 水土保持通报 2014年33卷第6期页码：236-241
- 作者机构：
  
  北京林业大学水土保持学院水土保持与荒漠化防治教育部重点实验室,北京,100083
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  "十二五"国家科技支撑计划项目"漓江流域水陆交错带生态修复关键技术与示范"(2012 BAC16 B03)
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2014.06.049
  中图分类号：
- 纸质出版：2014
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
李青山, 王冬梅, 信忠保. 漓江水陆交错带不同立地类型草本植物根系特征[J]. 水土保持通报, 2014,33(6):236-241.

LI Qing-shan, WANG Dong-mei, XIN Zhong-bao. Root System Characteristics of Herbaceous Plants at Different Sites of Aquatic-terrestrial Ecotone of Lijiang River[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2014, 33(6): 236-241.
李青山, 王冬梅, 信忠保. 漓江水陆交错带不同立地类型草本植物根系特征[J]. 水土保持通报, 2014,33(6):236-241. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2014.06.049.

LI Qing-shan, WANG Dong-mei, XIN Zhong-bao. Root System Characteristics of Herbaceous Plants at Different Sites of Aquatic-terrestrial Ecotone of Lijiang River[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2014, 33(6): 236-241. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2014.06.049.

摘要

在漓江流域水陆交错带选取缓坡、陡坡、江心洲、人工岸坡4种典型立地类型

对主要优势草本植物的根长、根表面积、根系生物量、地上生物量、根冠比等指标进行了调查和比较研究。结果表明:(1)同一立地类型不同优势草本植物根系生物量、地上生物量、根冠比差异性均显著。各立地类型不同优势草本植物根长、根表面积均存在一定的差异性

其中不同优势草本植物根长度和表面积在陡坡和人工岸坡立地类型均存在显著性差异(p<0.05);根表面积在江心洲立地类型存在显著性差异(p<0.05)。(2)水蓼(Polygonum hydropiper)、小蓬草(Conyza canadensis)最适合生长的立地类型是缓坡类型;白背黄花稔(Sida rhombifolia L.)、土牛膝(Achyranthes bidentata Bl.)最适合生长的立地类型是陡坡类型;紫菀(Aster tatarian)、艾草(Artemisia argyi)最适合生长的立地类型是江心洲类型;葎草(Humulus scandens Merr.)最适合生长的立地类型是人工岸坡类型。

Abstract

The root system characteristics

such as root length

root surface area and root biomass in different soil depths were studied to assessed the correlation between root system characteristics and aboveground biomass

root-shoot ratio. This research was conducted on gentle slope

steep slope

middle bar and artificial bank slope of four typical site types on the aquatic-terrestrial ecotone of Lijiang watershed. The result showed that:(1) Within the same site type

the root biomass

aboveground biomass and root-shoot ratio of different main herbaceous plants were different significantly; Root length and root surface had some differences in different site type. On steep slope and artificial bank slope

there were significant differences between root length and surface area(p<0.05). On middle bar

the difference of root surface area was significant(p<0.05).(2) Polygonum hydropiper and Conyza canadensis grow best on the gentle slope. Steep slope was the most suitable site for Sida rhombifolia L. and Achyranthes bidentata Bl. The middle bar was the most appropriate area for Tatarian aster and Artemisia argyi. Artificial bank can provide the optimum environment for the growth of Humulus scandens Merr.

关键词

Keywords

references

杨永德,吴虹,郭建东,等.漓江源及上游生态环境变化遥感调查[J].桂林工学院学报,2005,25(1):36-40.

黄伟军,刘秀珍,蔡德所.漓江水生态系统问题研究[J].生态经济,2007(3):131-134,159.

李鹏,赵忠,李占斌,等.植被根系与生态环境相互作用机制研究进展[J].西北林学院学报,2002,17(2):26-32.

胡刚,刘健.河口岸滩侵蚀研究进展[J].海洋地质动态,2006,22(6):5-9.

向小亮,宁书菊,魏道智.根系的研究进展[J].中国农学通报,2009,25(17):105-112.

Silveira C P, de Oliveira D A, Bonfim-Silva E M, et al. Two years of nitrogen and sulfur fertilizations in a signal grass pasture under degradation:Changes in the root system[J]. Revista Brasileira De Zootecnia-Brazilian Journal of Animal Science, 2011,40(6):1195-1203.

Leitner D, K S Bodner G, Schnepf A.A dynamic root system growth model based on L-Systems[J].Plant and Soil, 2010,332(1/2):177-192.

Wolfgang F P, Helmuth S. The response of roots of herbaceous plant species to heavy metals[J].Environmental and Experimental Botany, 1993,33(1):85-98.

Körner C, Renhardt U. Dry matter partitioning and root length/leaf area ratios in herbaceous perennial plants with diverse altitudinal distribution[J].Oecologia,1987,74(2):411-418.

朱云集,王晨阳,马元喜,等.砷胁迫对小麦根系生长及活性氧代谢的影响[J].生态学报,2000,20(4):707-710.

钟南,罗锡文,秦琴.基于生长函数的大豆根系生长的三维可视化模拟[J].农业工程学报,2008,24(7):151-154.

程洪,张新全.草本植物根系网固土原理的力学试验探究[J].水土保持通报,2002,22(5):20-23.

魏华炜,罗海波,张玉环.狗牙根根系分布特征及其抗拉强度试验研究[J].水土保持通报,2011,15(4):185-189.

程积民,万惠娥,王静.黄土丘陵区紫花苜蓿生长与土壤水分变化[J].应用生态学报,2005,16(3):435-438.

李文娆,张岁岐,山仑.水分胁迫对紫花苜蓿根系吸水与光合特性的影响[J].草地学报,2007,15(3):206-211.

白军红,邓伟,朱颜明,等.水陆交错带土壤氮素空间分异规律研究:以月亮泡水陆交错带为例[J].环境科学学报,2002,22(3):343-348.

燕辉,刘广全,李红生.青杨人工林根系生物量、表面积和根长密度变化[J].应用生态学报,2010,21(11):2763-2768.

缪钟灵.漓江上游枯水成因及补水措施[J].桂林工学院学报,1995,2(15):181-189.

Alatalo R U. Problems in the measurement of evenness in ecology[J]. Oikos, 1981,37(6):199-204.

梅莉,王政权,韩有志,等.水曲柳根系生物量、比根长和根长密度的分布格局[J].应用生态学报,2006,17(1):1-4.

陈芳清,李永,郄光武,等.水蓼对水淹胁迫的耐受能力和形态学响应[J].武汉植物学研究,2008,26(2):142-146.

黄德青,于兰,张耀生,等.祁连山北坡天然草地根冠比与气候因子的关系[J].干旱区研究,2011,28(6):1025-1030.

周梦华,程积民,万惠娥.云雾山本氏针茅群落根系分布特征[J].草地学报,2008,16(3):267-271.

程云环,韩有志,王庆成,等.落叶松人工林细根动态与土壤资源有效性关系研究[J].植物生态学报[J],2005,29(3):403-410.

云雷,毕华兴,马雯静,等.晋西黄土区林草复合系统刺槐根系分布特征[J].干旱区资源与环境[J],2012,26,(2):151-155.

耿浩林,王玉辉,王风玉,等.恢复状态下羊草(

Leymuschinensis

)草原植被根冠比动态及影响因子[J].生态学报,2008,28(10):4629-4634.

Chen Zuozhong, Wang Shiping. The Typical Grassland Ecosystem of China[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 2000.

言志信,宋杰,蔡汉成,等.草本植物加固边坡的力学原理[J].土木建筑与环境工程,2010,32(2):30-34.

Fitter A H. Characteristics and function s of root system[C]//Hidden Huf. Plant Roots. New York, USA:Y W aisd, Eshel and U kafk afi. Marcel Dokker,1996.

Docker B B, Hubble T C T. Quantifying root-reinforcement of river bank soils by four Australian tree species[J]. Geomorphology, 2008,100(3/4):401-418.

程瑞梅,王瑞丽,肖文发,等.三峡库区马尾松根系生物量的空间分布[J].生态学报,2012,32(3):823-832.

浏览量

1198

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

灌木根系几何特性对拉拔力影响的试验研究

砒砂岩区三种沙棘根系特征与固土能力

基于文献计量的长江经济带重点湖泊生态环境研究进展与趋势分析

土地利用和气候变化对河北省水生态系统服务的影响

长江中游城市群降碳-减污-扩绿-增长耦合协调的时空演变及影响机制