1. 岭南师范学院 地理系,广东,湛江,524048
2. 嘉应学院 地理科学与旅游学院,广东,梅州,514015
纸质出版:2014
移动端阅览
尚志海, 刘华, 邢伟纯. 潮州市湘桥区洪涝灾害承灾体易损性及其变化[J]. 水土保持通报, 2014,33(5):267-271.
SHANG Zhi-hai, LIU Hua, XING Wei-chun. Vulnerability and Its Changes of Flood Disaster-bearing Bodies in Xiangqiao District of Chaozhou City[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2014, 33(5): 267-271.
尚志海, 刘华, 邢伟纯. 潮州市湘桥区洪涝灾害承灾体易损性及其变化[J]. 水土保持通报, 2014,33(5):267-271. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2014.05.056.
SHANG Zhi-hai, LIU Hua, XING Wei-chun. Vulnerability and Its Changes of Flood Disaster-bearing Bodies in Xiangqiao District of Chaozhou City[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2014, 33(5): 267-271. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2014.05.056.
基于突变理论
选取城市人口状况、城市经济状况、生命线工程状况、城市环境状况等指标
构建洪涝灾害易损性评价指标体系。在理论分析的基础上
将评价模型应用于广东省潮州市湘桥区2000-2010年洪涝灾害易损性综合评价中。结果表明
湘桥区洪涝灾害承灾体易损性在波动中有所减小
其易损性变化有两个转折点
分别是2004和2008年。影响承灾体易损性变化的主要因素是人口自然增长率和建成区绿化覆盖率。可以通过以下途径降低该区洪涝灾害易损性:(1)控制人口增长速度;(2)增加建成区绿化覆盖率;(3)增加排水管网密度。
Based on catastrophe theory
an evaluation system of flood disaster-bearing bodies' vulnerability was constructed by indexes of the conditions of population
economy
lifeline engineering and environment. Then
the model was used to evaluate the vulnerability in Xiangqiao district in Chaozhou City of Guangdong Province during 2000 to 2010. The results showed that vulnerability in Xiangqiao district decreased in fluctuation
and it had two turning-points in 2004 and 2008
the main influencing factors of which were population growth and vegetation coverage rate. Several measures should be taken to reduce the vulnerability of flood disaster-bearing bodies in the study area
which include to control the increase of population
to increase the coverage of vegetation
and to increase the density of drainage pipe network.
尚志海,丘世钧.当代全球变化下城市洪涝灾害的动力机制[J].自然灾害学报,2009,18(1):100-105.
广东省防汛防旱防风总指挥部,广东省水利厅.广东省水旱风灾害[M].广州:暨南大学出版社,1997.
郭跃.灾害易损性研究的回顾与展望[J].灾害学,2005,20(4):92-96.
Blaikie P M. At Risk:Natural Hazards, People's Vulnerability, and Disasters[M]. London:Routledge, 1994.
Cutter S L. Vulnerability to environmental hazards[J]. Progress in Human Geography, 1996,20(4):529-539.
Turner B L, Kasperson R E, Matson P A, et al. A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2003,100(14):8074-8079.
ISDR. Living with risk:A global review of disaster reduction intitiatives[EB/OL].[2009-11-01].http://www.unisdr.org/publications.
姜彤,许朋柱.自然灾害研究的新趋势:社会易损性分析[J].灾害学,1996,11(2):5-9.
高吉喜,潘英姿,柳海鹰,等.区域洪水灾害易损性评价[J].环境科学研究,2004,17(6):30-34.
毛德华,王立辉.湖南城市洪涝易损性诊断与评估[J].长江流域资源与环境,2002,11(1):89-93.
刘兰芳,彭蝶飞,邹君.湖南省农业洪涝灾害易损性分析与评价[J].资源科学,2006,28(6):60-67.
张海玉,程先富,马武.洪涝灾害经济易损性模糊评价:以安徽沿长江地区为例[J].灾害学,2010,25(1):30-34.
葛鹏,岳贤平.洪涝灾害承灾体易损性的时空变异:以南京市为例[J].灾害学,2013,28(1):107-111.
王绍玉,刘佳.城市洪水灾害易损性多属性动态评价[J].水科学进展,2012,23(3):334-340.
周绍江.突变理论在环境影响评价中的应用[J].人民长江,2003,34(2):52-54.
施玉群,刘亚莲,何金平.关于突变评价法几个问题的进一步研究[J].武汉大学学报:工学版,2003,36(4):132-136.
冯平,李绍飞,李建柱.基于突变理论的地下水环境风险评价[J].自然灾害学报,2008,17(2):13-18.
韩晓军,肖琳,邱林.基于突变理论的灌区地下水资源承载力评价方法[J].灌溉排水学报,2011,30(1):113-116.
潮州市统计局,国家统计局潮州调查队.潮州统计年鉴2012[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2012.
刘希林,莫多闻.泥石流风险评价[M].成都:四川科学技术出版社,2003.
0
浏览量
1440
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621