西北农林科技大学 林学院, 陕西 杨凌,712100
纸质出版:2014
移动端阅览
刘敬美, 李新平, 李文斌, 等. 陕西省渭南市卤阳湖盐碱地土壤肥力综合评价[J]. 水土保持通报, 2014,33(5):254-257.
Soil Fertility Evaluation of Saline-alkali Land at Luyang Lake in Weinan City of Shaanxi Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2014, 33(5): 254-257.
刘敬美, 李新平, 李文斌, 等. 陕西省渭南市卤阳湖盐碱地土壤肥力综合评价[J]. 水土保持通报, 2014,33(5):254-257. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2014.05.053.
Soil Fertility Evaluation of Saline-alkali Land at Luyang Lake in Weinan City of Shaanxi Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2014, 33(5): 254-257. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2014.05.053.
为全面认识
有效管理和保护陕西省渭南市卤阳湖盐碱地土壤
分析了该地区土壤物理性质和盐碱特性。同时采用主成分分析法结合norm值
筛选出有机质
碱解氮
速效磷
速效钾
CEC
ESP
电导率和土壤容重8项指标
建立了该地区土壤综合质量评价最小数据集。结果表明
该地区土壤质地较黏重
土壤有机质(0.31)、碱解氮(0.39)、速效磷(0.26)、速效钾(0.38)的隶属度均值很小
是该地区土壤养分的主要限制因子。土壤容重隶属度为1
CEC隶属度为0.64
土壤碱化度(ESP)隶属度为0.61
说明该地区土壤紧实
但碱性极强。总之
利用加权求和指数法计算土壤肥力综合指数为0.277
说明该地区土壤肥力处于较低水平
需采取适当措施进行改良
以提高土壤肥力。
For comprehensive understanding
effective managing and protecting the saline-alkali soil of Luyang Lake in Weinan City
Shannxi Province
the authors analyzed the physical properties and salinity characteristics in the region. The principal component analysis combined with norm values were employed to select the indexes and establish the minimum data set
in which
organic matter
alkali-hydrolysable N
available P
available K
ESP
CEC
conductivity
and soil bulk density were selected as indexes for evalulating soil quality. The results showed that the soil texture was relatively heavy with more clay. The values of membership functions of the indexes revealed that organic matter(0.31)
alkali-hydrolysable N(0.39)
available P(0.26)
and available K(0.38) were the major limited soil nutrients factors in the region. The membership degrees of soil bulk density
CEC and ESP were 1
0.64 and 0.61
respectively
it indicated that the soil was compacted
but the alkaline was very extremely high. In short
the comprehensive index was 0.277 calculated by using the weighted index summation method to evalulate the soil fertility
which illustrated that the soil fertility in this region was at a low level. Therefore
it need to take appropriate improvement measures to improve soil fertility in Luyang Lake region.
赵可夫.中国的盐生植物[J].植物学通报,1999,16(3):201-207.
Garrison S, Ancela Z.The assessment of soil quality[J]. Geoderma, 2003,114:143-144.
Wander M M, Boilero G A.Soil quality assessment of tillage impacts in Illinois[J]. Soil Science Society America Journal, 1999,63(4):961-971.
Brown J S.Principal component and cluster analyses of cotton cultivar variability across the U.S. cotton belt[J]. Group Science, 1991,31(4):915-922.
Fox G A, Melta R. Soil property analysis using principal components analysis, soil line, and regression models[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2005,69(6):1782-1788.
陈留美,桂林国,吕家珑,等.应用主成分分析和聚类分析评价不同施肥处理条件下新垦淡灰钙土土壤肥力质量[J].土壤,2008,40(6):971-975.
赵丽娟,韩晓增,王守字,等.黑土长期施肥及养分循环再利用的作物产量及土壤肥力变化(Ⅳ):有机碳组分的变化[J].应用生态学报,2006,17(5):817-821.
胡月明,万洪富,吴忠峰,等.基于GIS的土壤质量模糊变权评价[J].土壤学报,2001,38(3):266-274.
沈善敏.长期土壤肥力试验的科学价值[J].植物营养与肥料学报,1995,1(1):1-9.
李月芬,汤洁,李艳梅.用主成分分析和灰色关联度分析评价草原土壤质量[J].世界地质,2004,23(2):169-174.
张甘霖,龚志同.土壤调查实验室分析方法[M].北京:科学出版社,2011.
鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].3版.北京:中国农业出版社,2008.
黄婷,岳西杰,葛玺祖,等.基于主成分分析的黄土沟壑区土壤肥力质量评价:以长武县耕地土壤为例[J].干旱地区农业研究,2010,28(3):141-148.
吴敏,何鹏,韦家少.海南岛胶园土壤肥力的综合评价[J].中国土壤与肥料,2009(2):1-5.
0
浏览量
1459
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621