南水北调中线水源地土壤侵蚀经济损失估算

朱明勇; 谭淑端; 张全发

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2014.05.043

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

南水北调中线水源地土壤侵蚀经济损失估算

试验研究

- 南水北调中线水源地土壤侵蚀经济损失估算
- Economic Loss Estimation of Soil Erosion in Water Source Area of Middle Route of South-to-North Water Transfer Project
- 水土保持通报 2014年33卷第5期页码：190-195
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 闽南师范大学历史与社会学系,福建,漳州,363000
  2. 湖南农业大学生物科学技术学院,湖南,长沙,410128
  3. 中国科学院武汉植物园水生植物与流域生态重点实验室,湖北,武汉,430074
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  福建省教育厅资助科技项目"南水北调中线水源地坡面土壤侵蚀机理及估算模型"(JA13194);中国博士后科学基金项目"黄土高原地区坡面土壤侵蚀过程机制及模型模拟"(2013M542390)
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2014.05.043
  中图分类号：
- 纸质出版：2014
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
朱明勇, 谭淑端, 张全发. 南水北调中线水源地土壤侵蚀经济损失估算[J]. 水土保持通报, 2014,33(5):190-195.

ZHU Ming-yong, TAN Shu-duan, ZHANG Quan-fa. Economic Loss Estimation of Soil Erosion in Water Source Area of Middle Route of South-to-North Water Transfer Project[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2014, 33(5): 190-195.
朱明勇, 谭淑端, 张全发. 南水北调中线水源地土壤侵蚀经济损失估算[J]. 水土保持通报, 2014,33(5):190-195. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2014.05.043.

ZHU Ming-yong, TAN Shu-duan, ZHANG Quan-fa. Economic Loss Estimation of Soil Erosion in Water Source Area of Middle Route of South-to-North Water Transfer Project[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2014, 33(5): 190-195. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2014.05.043.

摘要

在GIS的支持下

通过气象数据分析、实地调查、野外采样及室内分析、DEM计算、遥感解译等

构建了南水北调中线水源地丹江口水库库区流域地理信息数据库

并利用USLE估算了研究区的土壤侵蚀量。以1990年的价格为基准

利用市场价格法、机会成本法和影子工程法估算了水源区年均土壤侵蚀带来的经济损失。结果表明

水源区的年均土壤侵蚀模数为2394 t/(km

·a)。研究区表土流失造成的全氮、全磷、全钾和有机质损失量在分别换算成标准化肥磷酸二铵、氯化钾及薪柴后的经济损失分别为1.64×10

7.25×10

1.17×10

和2.97×10

元;年均侵蚀的土壤相当于61.94 km

的土地被废弃

经济损失为3.71×10

元。土壤侵蚀导致的涵养水分、泥沙淤积和泥沙滞留方面的经济损失分别为3.22×10

1.88×10

和1.95×10

元。水源区年均土壤侵蚀总经济损失达1.50×10

元

其中养分损失占96.11%。

Abstract

Based on the GIS

the geographic database was constructed through metrological data analysis

field survey

filed sampling and laboratory analysis

digital elevation model(DEM) calculation

remote sensing interpretation. The soil erosion amount in the Danjiangkou reservoir region was evaluated with the universal soil loss equation(USLE). The economic loss of annual soil erosion was evaluated(with constant price in 1990) by applying market value approach

opportunity cost method and shadow engineering price method. The results showed that the average annual soil erosion modulus was 2394 t/(km2·a). After converting the annual soil nutrient loss to standard chemical fertilizer(i.e. Diammonium phosphate and Potassium chloride) and fuel wood with some conversion coefficients

the corresponding economic loss of total N

total P

total K and soil organic matter were 1.64×108

7.25×107

1.17×107 and 2.97×107 yuan

respectively. The annual average soil erosion loss was almost euqual to 61.94 km2 land abandoned

and the economic loss was 3.71×107 yuan. The economic losses of water conservation decreased

silt retention and sediment deposition

which were caused by soil erosion. were 3.22×105

1.88×107 and 1.95×106 yuan respectively. Total annual economic loss of soil erosion in the area reached up to 1.50×109 yuan

in which the nutrient loss was accounting for 96.11%.

关键词

Keywords

references

Costanza R, Arge R, Groot R, et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature, 1997,387(15):253-260.

Dixon J. Analysis and management of watersheds[M]//Partha D, Karl-Goran M. The Environment and Emerging Development Issues. Oxford:Clarendrom Press, 1997.

欧阳志云,王效科,苗鸿.中国陆地生态系统服务及其生态经济价值的初步研究[J].生态学报,1999,19(5):607-613.

赵同谦,欧阳志云,王效科.中国陆地地表水生态系统服务功能及其生态经济价值评价[J].自然资源学报,2003,18(4):443-452.

王秀琴.茹河流域固原二期工程水土保持生态价值评价[J].水土保持通报,2012,32(6):240-244.

谢高地,张钇锂,鲁春霞,等.中国自然草地生态系统服务价值[J].自然资源学报,2001,16(1):47-53.

闫峰陵,雷少平,罗小勇.丹江口库区水土保持的生态服务功能价值估算研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2010,19(10):1205-1201.

徐国策,李占斌,李鹏.丹江鹦鹉沟小流域土壤侵蚀和养分损失定量分析[J].农业工程学报,2013,29(10):160-167.

李亦秋,冯仲科,韩烈保.丹江口库区及上游生态系统土壤保持效益价值评估[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2010,20(5):64-69.

中华人民共和国水利部水土保持监测中心.全国第二次土壤侵蚀遥感调查报告[R].北京,2001.

Wischmeier W H, Smith D D. Predicting rainfall erosion losses:A guide for conservation planning[M]. Agricultural Handbook of USDA, No. 537. Washington DC, 1978.

Yu Bo, Rosewell C J. An assessment of a daily rainfall erosivity model for New South Wales[J]. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 1996,34(1):139-152.

Kettler T A, Doran J W, Gilbert T L. Simplified method for soil particle-size determination to accompany soil-quality analyses[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2001,65(3):849-852.

袁可能.土壤有机矿质复合体研究(Ⅰ):土壤有机矿质复合体中腐殖质氧化稳定性的初步研究[J].土壤学报,1963,11(3):286-294.

Sharply A N, Williams J R. EPIC:Erosion/Productivity Impact Calculator(1):Model Documentation[M]. United States Department of Agriculture Technical Bulletin Number 1768, USDA. Washington DC, 1990.

蔡崇法,丁树文,史志华.应用USLE模型与地理信息系统IDRISI预测小流域土壤侵蚀量的研究[J].水土保持学报,2000,14(2):19-24.

Lufafa A, Tenywa M M, Isabirye M. Prediction of soil erosion in a lake victoria basin catchment using a GIS-based universal soil loss model[J]. Agricultural Systems, 2003,76(3):883-894.

Nearing M A, Romkens M J M, Norton L D, et al. Measurements and models of soil loss rates[J]. Science, 2000,290(5495):1300-1301.

浏览量

1409

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

南充市土壤侵蚀经济损失估值研究

汾河源头地区土壤侵蚀时空变化及其空间自相关分析

降雨与植被对大别山“林改园”区土壤侵蚀的影响

藏东南干旱河谷区土壤抗蚀性和水土流失过程模拟

内蒙古西乌珠穆沁旗退化草原生态经济损失空间分异规律及驱动因子