陕西省碳排放影响因素及其区域分异特征

栗新巧; 张艳芳; 刘宏宇

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2014.04.077

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

陕西省碳排放影响因素及其区域分异特征

试验研究

- 陕西省碳排放影响因素及其区域分异特征
- Factors and Regional Characteristics of Carbon Emission in Shaanxi Province
- 水土保持通报 2014年33卷第4期页码：328-333
- 作者机构：
  
  陕西师范大学旅游与环境学院,陕西,西安,710062
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目"区域土地利用的低碳效应与低碳经济发展模式研究:以西安市为例"(10XJA790011);陕西师范大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项(GK201302031);国家自然科学基金项目(41371523)
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2014.04.077
  中图分类号：
- 纸质出版：2014
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
栗新巧, 张艳芳, 刘宏宇. 陕西省碳排放影响因素及其区域分异特征[J]. 水土保持通报, 2014,33(4):328-333.

LI Xin-qiao, ZHANG Yan-fang, LIU Hong-yu. Factors and Regional Characteristics of Carbon Emission in Shaanxi Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2014, 33(4): 328-333.
栗新巧, 张艳芳, 刘宏宇. 陕西省碳排放影响因素及其区域分异特征[J]. 水土保持通报, 2014,33(4):328-333. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2014.04.077.

LI Xin-qiao, ZHANG Yan-fang, LIU Hong-yu. Factors and Regional Characteristics of Carbon Emission in Shaanxi Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2014, 33(4): 328-333. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2014.04.077.

摘要

根据1996-2010年陕西省终端能源消费数据及2010年各市区单位GDP能耗数据

对陕西省碳排放量进行了核算

并基于Kaya恒等式

利用对数平均Divisia指数分解模型对陕西省碳排放的影响因素进行了分解分析。结果表明:(1) 陕西省碳排放总量、人均碳排放量在1996-2000年均为小幅度下降

此后大幅度增加

而碳排放强度总体呈现出下降趋势。从能源消费碳排放比例来看

煤炭消费碳排放量占绝对比重(70.47%)。(2) 陕西省各市区碳排放总量与碳排放强度表现出明显的区域分异特征。陕西省的碳排放总量关中最高

陕北次之

陕南最小;地级市区中:西安市、榆林市和渭南市排放量超过5.00×10

杨凌区的碳排放量仅有7.21×10

t;渭南市和榆林市碳排放强度较高

而商洛市和杨凌区碳排放强度较低。(3) 经济产出、产业结构及人口规模对陕西省碳排放量的增加表现为正效应

能源结构和能源强度对陕西省碳排放量的增加表现为负效应。其中经济增长是陕西省碳排放量增加的决定因素

而能源强度降低是碳排放量减少的决定因素。

Abstract

Adopting the data about Shaanxi terminal energy consumption during 1996-2010 and energy consumption per unit of GDP for each city in Shaanxi Province in 2010

the total carbon emission

per capita carbon emission and carbon emission intensity were estimated

and the influence factors of carbon emission were analyzed by using LMDI(logarithmic mean divisia index) decomposition model based on the Kaya identity. The results show that:(1) The total carbon emission and per capita carbon emission of energy consumption were fallen slightly during 1996-2000

then showed a trend of increased volatility year by year during 2001-2010 in Shaanxi Province

while the carbon emission intensity presented a downward trend overall. According to the energy ratio of carbon emission

coal consumption accounted for absolute proportion(70.47%).(2) There were obvious differences of total carbon emission among each cities in Shaanxi Province

it was the highest in Guanzhong area

it was second in Northern Shaanxi Province

and it was the lowest in Southern Shaanxi Province; In the regional city: carbon emission were by more than 5.00×106 t in Yulin

Xi'an and Weinan City

but it was only 7.21×104 t in Yangling zone; The intensity was higher in Yulin and Weinan City

and was lower in Yangling zone and Shangluo City.(3) Economic output

industrial structure and population size showed a positive effect on carbon emission increasing during this period

while the energy intensity and energy structure showed a negative effect. Among all these influence factors

economic growth is the decisive factor for the carbon emission increasing

and the reduction of the energy intensity is a major determinant of carbon emission decreasing.

关键词

Keywords

references

IPCC. IPCC Fourth Assessment Report[EB/OL].(2009-03-05)[2013-06-18]. http://www.ipccch/ipccreports/ar4w-g3.html.

IEA. CO

emissions from fuel combustion(2008 edition)[R].International Energy Agency(IEA), Head of Communication and Information Office, 2009.

Boden T A, Marland G, Andres R J. Global, regional,and national fossil-fuel CO

emissions[R]. Oak Ridge Tenn, USA:Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, US Department of Ene-Rgy, 2009.

Ugur S, Ramazan S, Bradley T E. Energy consumption,income, and carbon emissions in the United States[J]. Ecological Economics, 2007,62(5):482-489.

Luciano C de F, Shinji K. Decomposing the decoupling of CO

emissions and economic growth in Brazil[J]. Ecological Economics, 2011, 70(6):1459-1469.

Inmaculada M Z, Antonello M. The impact of urbanization on CO

emissions:Evide-nce from developing countries[J]. Ecological Economics, 2011,70(5):1344-1353.

李健,周慧.中国碳排放强度与产业结构的关联分析[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2012,22(1):7-14.

刘定惠,杨永春.甘肃省碳排放变化的因素分解及实证分析[J].干旱区研究,2012,29(3):510-516.

蒋金荷.中国碳排放测算及影响因素分解[J].资源科学,2011,33(4):597-604.

Tol R S J, Pacala S W, Socolow R H. Understanding long-term energy use and carbon dioxide emissions in the USA[J]. Journal of Policy Modeling, 2009,31(3):425-445.

Nader S. Pathway to low-carbon economy:The Masder example[J]. Energy Procedia, 2009,38(1):3951-3958.

Wang Can, Chen Jining, Zou Ji. Decomposition of energy-related CO

emission in China:1957-2000[J]. Energy, 2005, 30(1):73-83.

徐国泉,刘泽渊,姜兆华.中国碳排放的因素分解模型及实证分析:1995-2004年[J].中国人口·资源与环境, 2006, 16(6):158-161.

朱勤,彭希哲,陆志明,等.中国能源消费碳排放变化的因素分解及实证分析[J].资源科学,2009,31(12):2072-2079.

李艳梅,张雷,程晓凌.中国碳排放变化的因素分解与减排途径分析[J].资源科学,2010,32(2):218-222.

苏雅丽,张艳芳.陕西省土地利用变化的碳排放效应研究[J].水土保持学报,2011,25(1):152-156.

国家发展和改革委员会能源研究所.中国可持续发展能源暨碳排放情景分析[R].北京:国家发展和改革委员会能源研究所, 2003.

Kaya Yoichi. Impact of carbon dioxide emission on GNP growth:Interpretation of proposed scenarios[R]. Paris:Presentation to the Energy and Industry Subgroup, Response Strategies Working Group, IPCC, 1989.

Ang B W. Decomposition analysis for policymaking in energy:Which is the preferred method[J]. Energy Policy, 2004, 32(9):1131-1139.

Lin Boqiang, Du Kerui. Decomposing energy intensity change:A combination of index decomposition analysis and production-theoretical decomposition analysis[J]. Applied Energy, 2014,129(9):158-165.

浏览量

1589

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

基于土地利用变化的陕西省县域碳排放时空变化及影响因素研究

山东省种植业碳排放时空特征、驱动因素及其未来变化趋势

陕西省荒漠化土地治理综合效益评价

黄河流域甘肃段粮食生产全周期碳平衡测量与区划

基于生态足迹模型的区域生态经济发展评估--陕西省及其各市域实证分析