云南师范大学旅游与地理科学学院,云南,昆明,650500
纸质出版:2014
移动端阅览
宗路平, 角媛梅, 华红莲, 等. 哈尼梯田景观水源林区土壤水分垂直变化与持水性能[J]. 水土保持通报, 2014,33(4):59-64.
ZONG Lu-ping, JIAO Yuan-mei, HUA Hong-lan, et al. Vertical Changes of Soil Moisture and Water Holding Capacity of Hani Terraces Landscape in Water Conservation Forest Region[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2014, 33(4): 59-64.
宗路平, 角媛梅, 华红莲, 等. 哈尼梯田景观水源林区土壤水分垂直变化与持水性能[J]. 水土保持通报, 2014,33(4):59-64. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2014.04.025.
ZONG Lu-ping, JIAO Yuan-mei, HUA Hong-lan, et al. Vertical Changes of Soil Moisture and Water Holding Capacity of Hani Terraces Landscape in Water Conservation Forest Region[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2014, 33(4): 59-64. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2014.04.025.
采用ThetaProbeML2x土壤水分测定仪和环刀取样法对哈尼梯田景观水源林区主要植被类型(林地和草地)下0-300 cm土层的土壤水分特征及其持水性能进行了研究。研究结果表明:(1) 各样地[样地Ⅰ(林地)
样地Ⅱ(林地)
样地Ⅲ(草地)]土壤水分垂直分布为"双峰"波动型
样地Ⅰ和Ⅲ波动弱
样地Ⅱ波动剧烈
拐点出现在60
140和230 cm土层附近
土壤水分运动趋势在拐点处受邻层土壤含水量影响大;(2) 粉沙性质地土壤(样地Ⅱ)水分变异系数高于黏性质地土壤(样地Ⅰ
Ⅲ);林地土壤水分变异系数大于草地土壤;(3) 样地Ⅰ土壤和草地Ⅲ土壤蓄水量均较样地Ⅱ高
且其值相近
黏性壤土的蓄水能力优于粉沙性土壤;(4) 水源林区0-160 cm土层最大持水量和毛管持水量由大到小均表现为:样地Ⅰ > 样地Ⅲ > 样地Ⅱ;非毛管持水量由大到小表现为:样地Ⅱ > 样地Ⅰ > 样地Ⅲ
样地Ⅰ和样地Ⅲ的土壤水源涵蓄能力较强
样地Ⅱ土壤调节水分能力较强。
Using soil moisture monitor(ThetaProbeML2x) and soil ring sampler methods
we analyzed the soil moisture and water capacity of the main landscape(forest
grassland)soil with a 300 cm depth in the water conservation forest region in the Hani terraces landscape in Yuanyang County
Yunnan Province. The results indicated that:(1) The distribution features of the three soil profile sample plot Ⅰ(forest)
sample plot Ⅱ(forest)
sample plot Ⅲ(grass) were "double-peak fluctuation" type with turning points at nearby the 60
140 and 230 cm.(2) The coefficient of variation of sandy soil moisture was higher than clay soil(sample plot Ⅰ
Ⅲ)
and the coefficient of variation of forest was higher than grass while both soil samples were clay.(3) The water storage capacity of both sample plot Ⅰ(forest) and on of sample plot Ⅲ(grass) were higher than sample plot Ⅱ(forest)
and values were similar
the water storage ability of clay loam was better than that of silty sand soil.(4) Both the max water holding capacity and capillary moisture capacity at the 0-160 cm depth were ordered as: sample plot Ⅰ(forest) higher than sample plot Ⅲ(grass) and higher than sample plot Ⅱ(forest)
this indicated the water retention function of sample plot Ⅰ(forest) and sample plot Ⅲ(grass) were higher
however
soil water regulation function of sample plotⅡ(forest) was higher.
温远光,刘世荣.我国主要森林生态系统类型降水截留规律的数量分析[J].林业科学,1995,31(4):289-298.
石培礼,吴波,程根伟,等.长江上游地区主要森林植被类型蓄水能力的初步研究[J].自然资源学报,2004,19(3):351-360.
王贺年,余新晓,李轶涛.北京山区林地土壤水分动态变化[J].山地学报,2011,29(6):701-706.
余雷,张一平,沙丽清,等.哀牢山亚热带常绿阔叶林土壤含水量变化规律及其影响因子[J].生态学杂志,2013,32(2):332-336.
Crave A, Casuel O C.The influence of topography on the time and space distribution of soil surface water content[J].Hydrological Processes, 1997,11(2):203-210.
陈波,剪文灏,吕发,等.冀北山地蒙古栎天然林土壤物理性质及水源涵养功能研究[J].水土保持通报,2013,33(2):83-86,92.
傅伯杰,陈利顶,邱扬,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区土地利用结构与生态过程[M].北京:商务印书馆,2002:72-150.
张北赢,徐学选,刘江华.黄土丘陵沟壑区不同土地利用方式的土壤水分效应[J].水土保持通报,2005,25(6):5-9.
王志强,刘宝元,张岩.不同植被类型对厚层黄土剖面水分含量的影响[J].地理学报,2008,63(7):703-713.
潘春翔,李裕元,彭亿,等.湖南乌云界自然保护区典型生态系统的土壤持水性能[J].生态学报,2012,32(2):538-547.
邹俊亮,邵明安,龚时慧.不同植被和土壤类型下土壤水分剖面的分异[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(6):12-17.
角媛梅.哈尼梯田自然与文化景观生态研究[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2009:50-72.
中国生态系统研究网络科学委员会.陆地生态系统水环境观测规范[M].北京:中国环境科学出版,2007.
马雪华.森林水文学[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1993.
0
浏览量
1450
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621