1. 中国科学院亚热带农业生态研究所亚热带农业生态过程重点实验室,湖南,长沙,410125
2. 中国科学院环江喀斯特农业生态试验站, 广西环江,547100
3. 广西师范大学环境与资源学院,广西,桂林,541004
纸质出版:2014
移动端阅览
胡乐宁, 苏以荣, 何寻阳. 桂西北喀斯特地区典型土壤在不同筛分强度下团聚体的稳定性[J]. 水土保持通报, 2014,33(3):236-241.
HU Le-ning, SU Yi-rong, HE Xun-yang. Soil Aggregates Stability at Different Sieving Strength for Typical Soils in Karst Region of Northwest Guangxi Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2014, 33(3): 236-241.
胡乐宁, 苏以荣, 何寻阳. 桂西北喀斯特地区典型土壤在不同筛分强度下团聚体的稳定性[J]. 水土保持通报, 2014,33(3):236-241. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2014.03.047.
HU Le-ning, SU Yi-rong, HE Xun-yang. Soil Aggregates Stability at Different Sieving Strength for Typical Soils in Karst Region of Northwest Guangxi Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2014, 33(3): 236-241. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2014.03.047.
采用AS 200筛分仪分析了不同有机碳含量下3种喀斯特典型土壤(红壤、棕色石灰土、黑色石灰土)的团聚体颗粒在不同筛分强度(1.5
2和2.5 mm振幅)的分级特征。结果显示
3种土壤平均重量直径(MWD)从大到小为:黑色石灰土>棕色石灰土>红壤(p<0.05)。随筛分强度由小到大
棕色石灰土和黑色石灰土的团聚体颗粒分级变化较小
红壤团聚体颗粒分级由大颗粒(>8
8~5
5~2 mm)团聚体为主逐渐变为中间粒径颗粒(5~2
2~1 mm)。红壤团聚体结构最易被筛分过程破坏
其次是棕色石灰土
最后是黑色石灰土。研究表明石灰土团聚体机械稳定性强于红壤
且筛分强度直接影响团聚体分级结果。从团聚体聚合角度来看
喀斯特石灰土土壤稳定性较强。
Soil aggregates of two karst soils(terra fusca and rendzina) and one zonal soil(red soil) with different soil organic carbon(SOC) contents were analyzed at 1.5
2 and 2.5 mm sieving strength using AS200. Results show that the three soils
in order of decreasing mean soil weight diameter(MWD)
were rendzina
terra fusca and red soil(p<0.05). With the change of sieving strength
particle size fractions of soil aggregates for terra fusca and rendzina were the same
while for red soil
the fraction changed from the dominance by large aggregates(>8
8~5 and 5~2 mm) to middle sizes(5~2 and 2~1 mm). Red soil was the most easily destroyed soil
terra fusca was the second
and rendzina was the third
according to the mechanical classification. This implies that the mechanical stability of karst soil aggregates was better than that of red soil
and soil aggregate classification for the karst soils was directly affected by sieving strength. From the point of view of soil aggregates
the stability of the karst soils was stronger.
张华,张甘霖.土壤质量及其评价方法[J].土壤,2001,3(6):326-330.
张兴昌,邵明安.水蚀作用下土壤氮与有机质流失[J].应用生态学报,2000,11(2):231-234.
郑昭佩,刘作新.土壤质量及其评价[J].应用生态学报,2003,14(1):131-134.
卢金伟,李占斌.土壤团聚体研究进展[J].水土保持研究,2002,9(1):81-85.
刘冬.不同侵蚀度红壤团聚体中黏粒矿物分布特征及其对团聚体稳定性的影响[D].武汉:华中农业大学,2007.
郭菊花,陈小云,刘满强,等.不同施肥处理对红壤性水稻土团聚体的分布及有机碳、氮含量的影响[J].土壤,2007,39(5):787-793.
向艳文,郑圣先,廖育林,等.长期施肥对红壤水稻土水稳定性团聚体有机碳、氮分布与储量的影响[J].中国农业科学,2009,42(7):2415-2424.
董长勋,李恋青,王芳,等.水稻土微团聚体吸附磷后对Cu
2+
吸附与解吸的影响[J].南京农业大学学报,2006,9(4):75-79.
魏朝富,高明,谢德体.有机肥对紫色水稻土水稳定性团聚体的影响[J].土壤通报,1995,26(3):114-116.
Yoder R. A direct method of aggregate analysis of soils and a study of the physical nature of erosion loesses[J]. J.Am.Soc. Agron., 1936,28(5):337-351.
郑子成,王永东,李廷轩,等.退耕对土壤团聚体稳定性及有机碳分布的影响[J].自然资源学报,2011,26(1):119-127.
蒋静,周运超,杜光平.石灰岩发育的乔木林下土壤团聚体形成的影响因素[J].中国水土保持,2011(7):47-66.
李阳兵,魏朝富,谢德体,等.岩溶山区植被破坏前后土壤团聚体分形特征研究[J].土壤通报,2006,37(1):51-56.
李阳兵,谢德体.不同土地利用方式对岩溶山地土壤团粒结构的影响[J].水土保持学报,2001,15(4):122-125.
Parffit R L, Yeates G W, Ross D J, et al. Relationships between soil biota, nitrogen and phosphorus availability, and pasture growth under organic and conventional management[J].Applied Soil Ecology, 2005,28(1):1-13.
史奕,陈欣.土壤团聚体的稳定机制及人类活动的影响[J].应用生态学报,2002,13(11):1491-1494.
Six J, Elliott E T, Paustian K. Soil macroaggregate turnover and microaggregate formation:A mechanism for C sequestration under notillage agriculture[J]. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2000,32(14):2099-2103.
章明奎,何振立.利用方式对红壤水稳定性团聚体形成的影响[J].土壤学报,1997,34(4):359-366.
Chenu C, Le Bissonnais Y, Arrouays D. Organic matter influence on clay wettability and soil aggregate stability[J]. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 2000,64(4):1479-1486.
Caron J, Espindola C R, Angers D A. Soil structural stability during rapid wetting:Influence of land use on some aggregate properties[J]. Soil. Sci. Soc. Am. J., 1996,60(3):901-908.
陈晓侠,梁爱珍,张晓平.土壤团聚体固碳的研究方法[J].应用生态学报,2012,23(7):1999-2006.
0
浏览量
1282
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621