基于能值-生态足迹修正模型的区域可持续发展研究——以江苏省南通市为例

盛业旭; 刘琼; 欧名豪; 佴伶俐

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2014.03.042

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

基于能值-生态足迹修正模型的区域可持续发展研究——以江苏省南通市为例

试验研究

- 基于能值-生态足迹修正模型的区域可持续发展研究——以江苏省南通市为例
- A Study of Regional Sustainable Development Based on Modified Model of Energetic Ecological Footprint-A Case Study of Nantong City, Jiangsu Province
- 水土保持通报 2014年33卷第3期页码：211-217
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 南京农业大学土地管理学院,江苏,南京,210095
  2. 江苏省土地勘测规划院,江苏,南京,210024
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金青年项目"基于利益相关者的土地利用规划与城市规划冲突治理研究"(71103090);教育部哲学社会科学重大项目"我国建设用地总量控制与差别化管理政策研究"(11JZD031)
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2014.03.042
  中图分类号：
- 纸质出版：2014
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
盛业旭, 刘琼, 欧名豪, 等. 基于能值-生态足迹修正模型的区域可持续发展研究——以江苏省南通市为例[J]. 水土保持通报, 2014,33(3):211-217.

SHENG Ye-xu, LIU Qiong, OU Ming-hao, et al. A Study of Regional Sustainable Development Based on Modified Model of Energetic Ecological Footprint-A Case Study of Nantong City, Jiangsu Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2014, 33(3): 211-217.
盛业旭, 刘琼, 欧名豪, 等. 基于能值-生态足迹修正模型的区域可持续发展研究——以江苏省南通市为例[J]. 水土保持通报, 2014,33(3):211-217. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2014.03.042.

SHENG Ye-xu, LIU Qiong, OU Ming-hao, et al. A Study of Regional Sustainable Development Based on Modified Model of Energetic Ecological Footprint-A Case Study of Nantong City, Jiangsu Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2014, 33(3): 211-217. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2014.03.042.

摘要

在系统分析能值-生态足迹模型缺陷的基础上

通过增加人工投入指标

统一能值密度以及引入折能/折标系数对其进行了修正

并采用修正后的模型对江苏省南通市1996-2010年的可持续发展水平进行了测算。结果表明: (1) 1996-2010年间南通市人均生态足迹由0.65 hm

增长到0.90 hm

主要是由能源消费量的增加引起的; (2) 同期南通市人均生态承载力由0.51 hm

增长到0.81 hm

这主要是由农、畜产品产量提高和水电开发力度加大引起的

而通过劳务和资金投入提高承载力的空间很大; (3) 1996-2010年南通市一直处于生态赤字状态

可持续性评价指数也都在0.5以上

区域发展处于不可持续状态。为进一步缩小生态承载力与生态足迹之间的差距

应采取以下措施:引导重点行业和企业节能降耗

大力发展新能源; 加大农业科技投入

继续提高农产品产量;重视人力资源的投入

促使经济发展方式向技术密集型和资本密集型转变。

Abstract

A traditional model of energetic ecological footprint was modified through adding artificial input indexes

unifying energy density and introducing energy-releasing/standard-coal coefficient

based on the assessment of the traditional model. Then

the sustainable development level of Nantong City

Jiangsu Province from 1996 to 2010 was measured with the modified model. Results show that: (1) The ecological footprint of Nantong City increased from 0.65 to 0.90 hm2 per capita from 1996 to 2010

caused by the rapid energy consumption. (2) The ecological carrying capacity of Nantong City increased from 0.51 to 0.81 hm2 per capita during the period

supported by the growth of agricultural and hydropower production

with a large potential of labor and capital input. (3) Nantong City has been in a state of ecological dificit

and the sustainability evaluation index was always larger than 0.5 from 1996 to 2010

which means that Nantong City was in an unsustainable state. In order to narrow the gap between ecological footprint and ecological carrying capacity

some measures can be put forward: guiding major industries and enterprises to save energy and exploiting new energy actively; increasing the investment in agricultural technology to improve agricultural production; and paying attention to investment in human resources and promoting technology and capital intensified economy.

关键词

Keywords

references

周国华.区域规划教程[M].北京:科学出版社,2011:52-53.

冯年华.区域可持续发展创新:理论与实证分析[M].北京:工商出版社,2004:100-101.

Zhao Sheng, Li Zizhen, Li Wenlong. A modified method of ecological footprint calculation and its application[J]. Ecological Modeling, 2005,185(1):65-75.

Odum H T. Self-organization, transformity, and information[J]. Science, 1988,242(25):1132-1139.

Rees W E. Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity:What urban economics leaves out[J]. Environment and Urbanization, 1992,4(2):121-130.

Wackernagel M, Onisto L, Bello P, et al. National natural capital accounting with the ecological footprint concept[J]. Ecological Economics, 1999,29(3):375-39.

Chen Bin, Chen Guoqian. Ecological footprint accounting based on emergy:A case study of the Chinese society[J]. Ecological Modeling, 2006,198(1/2):101-114.

张芳怡,濮励杰,张健.基于能值分析理论的生态足迹模型及其应用:以江苏省为例[J].自然资源学报,2006,21(4):653-659.

Siche R, Agostinho F, Ortega E. Emergy net primary production(ENPP) as basis for calculation of ecological footprint[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2010,10(2):475-483.

Pereira L, Ortega E. A modified footprint method:The case study of Brazil[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2012,16:113-127.

张雪花,李建,张宏伟.基于能值生态足迹整合模型的城市生态型评价方法研究[J].北京大学学报:自然科学版,2011,47(2):344-352.

王国刚,杨德刚,张新焕,等.基于能值理论的生态足迹改进模型及其应用[J].中国科学院研究生院报,2012,29(3):352-358.

Zhao Sheng, Song Ke, Gui Feng, et al. The emergy ecological footprint for small fish farm in China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2013,29:62-67.

赵桂慎.生态经济学[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2009:93-94.

Odum H T, Brown M T, Williams S B. Handbook of Emergy Evaluations Folios[M]. Center for Environmental Policy, University of Florida, 2000.

蓝盛芳,钦佩,陆宏芳.生态经济系统能值分析[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2002:5-77.

赵志强,李双成,高阳.基于能值改进的开放系统生态足迹模型及其应用:以深圳市为例[J].生态学报,2008,28(5):2220-2230.

Chen Guoqian, Chen Bin. Extended-exergy analysis of the Chinese society[J]. Energy, 2009,34(9):1127-1144.

金丹,卞正富.基于能值的生态足迹模型及其在资源型城市的应用[J].生态学报,2010,30(7):1725-1733.

严茂超,李海涛,程鸿,等.中国农林牧渔业主要产品的能值分析与评估[J].北京林业大学学报,2001,23(6):66-69.

浏览量

1270

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

西安生态足迹计算与分析

基于生态足迹模型的区域可持续发展定量分析--以山东省烟台市为例

绵阳市生态足迹和生态承载力动态变化分析

基于改进生态足迹因子的区域可持续性动态评估——以陕西省为例

日照市生态足迹与经济增长关系的计量分析