北京林业大学省部共建森林培育与保护教育部重点实验室,北京,100083
纸质出版:2014
移动端阅览
宋小帅, 康峰峰, 韩海荣, 等. 太岳山不同郁闭度油松人工林枯落物及土壤水文效应[J]. 水土保持通报, 2014,33(3):102-108.
SONG Xiao-shuai, KANG Feng-feng, HAN Hai-rong, et al. Hydrological Effects of Forest Litters and Soil in Pinus Tabulaeformis Plantation Under Different Degrees of Canopy Coverage in Taiyue Mountains[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2014, 33(3): 102-108.
宋小帅, 康峰峰, 韩海荣, 等. 太岳山不同郁闭度油松人工林枯落物及土壤水文效应[J]. 水土保持通报, 2014,33(3):102-108. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2014.03.020.
SONG Xiao-shuai, KANG Feng-feng, HAN Hai-rong, et al. Hydrological Effects of Forest Litters and Soil in Pinus Tabulaeformis Plantation Under Different Degrees of Canopy Coverage in Taiyue Mountains[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2014, 33(3): 102-108. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2014.03.020.
通过定位试验结合室内测定的方法
研究了山西太岳山不同郁闭度油松人工林枯落物及土壤水文效应。结果表明:(1) 不同郁闭度林分枯落物储量变化范围为7.43~10.86 t/hm
2
随郁闭度增加枯落物储量增加;最大持水率变化范围为276.54%~311.33%
最大持水深为8.02~14.34 mm
表现为(按郁闭度排序):0.7 > 0.6 > 0.8 > 0.5
郁闭度为0.7林分的枯落物持水效果最好;枯落物未分解层和半分解层持水量与浸泡时间呈明显对数关系(R>0.87)
持水速率与浸泡时间呈明显幂函数关系(R>0.94)。(2) 不同郁闭度林分土壤容重变化范围为1.36~1.49 g/cm
3
总孔隙度均值变化范围为44.71%~48.75%
有效持水量变化范围为395.33~831.00 t/hm
2
表现为(按郁闭度排序):0.6 > 0.7 > 0.5 > 0.8;稳渗速率变化范围为1.00~3.47 mm/min。
A study was conducted at different degrees of canopy coverage in Pinus tabulaeformis plantation in the Taiyue Mountains
Shanxi Province
to analyze the hydrological functions of litters and soil layers. The results showed that: (1) The total storage capacity of litter layers was about 7.43~10.86 t/hm2
and litters increased with canopy coverage increasing. The maximum water holding rate ranged from 276.54% to 311.33% and the maximum water holding depth
from 8.02 to 14.34 mm
showing an order in canopy coverage of 0.7 > 0.6 > 0.8 > 0.5. The forest with canopy coverage of 0.7 showed better water holding capability. Water holding rate and soaking time without decomposition litters and semi-decomposition litters had a visible logarithmic relationship(R>0.87)
and absorption speed rate and immersion time had a power function relationship(R>0.94).(2) The average soil bulk density for different degrees of canopy coverage ranged from 1.36 to 1.49 g/cm3; total soil porosity
from 44.71% to 48.75%; effective water storage
from 395.33 to 831.00 t/hm2
and soil stable infiltration rate
from 1.00 to 3.47 mm/min.
刘世荣,温远光,王兵.中国森林生态系统水文生态功能规律[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1996:61-62.
周祥,赵一鹤,张洪江,等.云南高原典型林分林下枯落物持水特征研究[J].生态环境学报,2011,20(2):248-252.
罗跃初,韩单恒,王宏昌,等.辽西半干旱区几种人工林生态系统涵养水源功能研究[J].应用生态学报,2004,15(6):919-923.
饶良懿,朱金兆,毕华兴.重庆四面山森林枯落物和土壤水文效应[J].北京林业大学学报,2005,27(1):33-37.
陈华,田汉勤.全球变化对陆地生态系统枯落物分解的影响[J].生态学报,2001,21(9):1549-1563.
陈丽华,余新晓,张东升,等.贡嘎山冷杉林区苔藓层截持降水过程研究[J].北京林业大学学报,2002,24(4):60-63.
余新晓.森林生态水文[M].中国林业出版社:2004.
吴彦,刘庆,乔永康,等.亚高山针叶林不同恢复阶段群落物种多样性变化及其对土壤理化性质的影响[J].植物生态学报,2001,25(6):648-65.
Binkley D, Giardina C.Why do tree species affect soils? The warp and woof of tree-soil interactions[J]. Biogeochemistry, 1998, 42(1/2):89-106.
Turner M G, Gardner R H, Dale V H, et al. Predicting the spread of disturbance across heterogeneous landscapes[J].Oikos, 1989,55(1):121-129.
李秀彬.全球环境变化研究的核心领域:土地利用土地覆盖变化的国际研究动向[J].地理学报,1996,51(6):553-558.
周彬,韩海荣,康峰峰,等.太岳山不同郁闭度油松人工林降水分配特征[J].生态学报,2013,33(5):1645-1653.
白晋华,胡振华,郭晋平.华北山地次生林典型森林类型枯落物及土壤水文效应研究[J].水土保持学报,2009,23(2):84-89.
王士永,余新晓,贾国栋,等.北京山区主要人工林枯落物水文效应[[J].中国水土保持科学,2011,9(5):42-47.
郭汉清,白秀梅.三种主要森林类型枯落物水文效应研究[J].山西水土保持科技,2006,2(2):13-15.
梁文俊,丁国栋,周美思,等.冀北山地油松和落叶松林下枯落物的水文效应[J].水土保持通报,2012,32(4):71-74.
齐记,史宇,余新晓,等.北京山区主要树种枯落物水文功能特征研究[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(3):73-77.
宋庆丰,杨新兵,张金柱,等.雾灵山典型林分枯落物和土壤水文效应[J].生态环境学报,2009,18(6):2316-2320.
王轶浩,王彦辉,谢双喜,等.六盘山小流域地形、植被特征与土壤水文物理性质的关系[J].生态学杂志,2012,31(1):145-151.
0
浏览量
1775
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621