1. 甘肃农业大学林学院,甘肃,兰州,730070
2. 黄河水土保持西峰治理监督局,甘肃,庆阳,745000
纸质出版:2014
移动端阅览
袁静, 张富, 李怀有, 等. 南小河沟流域不同措施处理下的水土流失规律[J]. 水土保持通报, 2014,33(3):39-43.
YUAN Jing, ZHANG Fu, LI Huai-you, et al. Law of Soil and Water Loss Under Different Measures in South Xiaohegou Watershed[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2014, 33(3): 39-43.
袁静, 张富, 李怀有, 等. 南小河沟流域不同措施处理下的水土流失规律[J]. 水土保持通报, 2014,33(3):39-43. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2014.03.009.
YUAN Jing, ZHANG Fu, LI Huai-you, et al. Law of Soil and Water Loss Under Different Measures in South Xiaohegou Watershed[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2014, 33(3): 39-43. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2014.03.009.
以南小河沟流域长期定位试验场为研究对象
研究了10种不同措施处理下水土流失规律。结果表明
泥沙流失量与径流量变化规律并不一致。一般坡度越大
侵蚀量的增量越大。由于坡度越大
需要坡长越长才能和坡度较小的的坡面受水面积相等
这时即使因为坡度加大
入渗率减少
但实际入渗水量也有较大增加
即坡面水流的径流量并不会随着坡度的加大而无限的加大
20°为径流量临界坡度;采用水平阶整地的油松沙棘混交林地
植被覆盖度达到65%
水土流失治理效果显著
平均含沙量2.377 kg/m
3
比裸地减少了57.77%以上;平均径流量0.121 m
3
比裸地减少了19.74%以上;以生物措施为主进行水土保持治理的杨家沟小流域与原始生态环境下的董庄沟小流域相比较
2012年侵蚀模数减少了2 589.95 t/(km
2
·a)。
A study with 10 treatments was conducted in the long-term observation station of the South Xiaohegou watershed to investigate the law of soil and water loss under different surface treatments. Results show that soil loss was not consistent with runoff processes
but affected by slope. The soil loss incremental rate generally increased with increasing slope degree. However
when slope increased
slope length for collecting the same amount of water as at the smaller slope increased
which could lead to a reduction in water infiltration into soil
but the total infiltration increased. Therefore
runoff amount did not show a proportional increase with slope increase when slope was greater than 20°which was determined as the threshold. The study also shows that a mixed plantation of Chinese pine tree with sea-buckthorn at a coverage of 65% could significantly reduce soil and water loss
with a sediment concentration of 2.377 kg/m3 which was 57.77% lower than soil loss on the bare land. The averaged runoff of 0.121 m3 under the plantation was 19.74% lower than the bare land. In 2012
soil erosion index for the Yangjiagou watershed where biological control practices for soil and water conservation had been applied was 2 589.95 t/km2 lower than the Dongzhuanggou watershed which remained in the natural conditions without any human disturbance.
王万忠,焦菊英,马丽梅,等.黄土高原不同侵蚀类型区侵蚀产沙强度变化及其治理目标[J].水土保持通报,2012,32(5):1-7.
王兵,刘国彬,张光辉,等.基于DPSIR概念模型的黄土丘陵区退耕还林(草)生态环境效应评估[J].水利学报,2013,44(2):143-153.
王晗生.旱区经营人工植被对土壤干化过程的调控[J].自然资源学报,2011,24(4):562-577.
赵其国.我国南方当前水土流失与生态安全中值得重视的问题[J].水土保持通报,2006,26(2):1-8.
高光耀,傅伯杰,吕一河,等.干旱半干旱区坡面覆被格局的水土流失效应研究进展[J].生态学报,2013,33(1):12-22.
张建香,张勃,马中华,等.基于遥感的植被覆盖变化分区研究:以黄土高原马莲河流域为例[J].遥感技术与应用,2013,28(1):137-143.
陈绍宇,许建民,王文龙,等.黄土高塬沟壑区董志塬沟头溯源侵蚀特征及其防治途径[J].水土保持通报,2009,29(4):37-41.
秦永胜,刘松,余新晓,等.华北土石山区水源保护林小流域土壤侵蚀过程的模拟研究[J].土壤学报,2004,41(6):864-869.
吴昌广,林德生,肖文发,等.三峡库区降雨侵蚀力时空分布特征[J].应用生态学报,2011,22(1):151-158.
付智勇,李朝霞,蔡崇法,等.不同起始条件下坡面薄层紫色土水分和壤中流响应[J].水利学报,2011,42(8):899-907.
周毅,魏天兴,解建强,等.黄土高原不同林地类型水土保持效益分析[J].水土保持学报,2011,25(3):12-16.
王万忠,焦菊英.中国的土壤侵蚀因子定量评价研究[J].水土保持通报,1996,16(5):1-20.
郭忠升,邵明安.人工柠条林地土壤水分补给和消耗动态变化规律[J].水土保持学报,2007,21(2):119-123.
殷健,梁珊珊.城市化对上海市区域降水的影响[J].水文,2010,30(2):66-72.
万龙,马芹,张建军,等.黄土高原降雨量空间插值精度比较:KRIGING与TPS法[J].中国水土保持科学,2011,9(3):79-87.
王改玲,王青杵,石生新.晋北黄土区降雨特征及其对坡地土壤侵蚀的影响[J].水土保持学报,2013,27(1):1-5.
0
浏览量
1734
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621