神府东胜煤田扰动与原生地面产流产沙规律对比研究

白芸; 王文龙; 黄鹏飞; 李宏伟; 王贞; 王正利; 李仁

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2014.03.008

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

神府东胜煤田扰动与原生地面产流产沙规律对比研究

试验研究

- 神府东胜煤田扰动与原生地面产流产沙规律对比研究
- Comparative Study of Runoff and Sediment Yielding from Disturbed and Original Sites in Shenfu-Dongsheng Coalfield
- 水土保持通报 2014年33卷第3期页码：33-38
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 西北农林科技大学水土保持研究所黄土高原土壤侵蚀与旱地农业国家重点实验室, 陕西杨凌,712100
  2. 中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所, 陕西杨凌,712100
  3. 江西省水土保持科学研究院土壤侵蚀与防治重点实验室,江西,南昌,330029
  4. 浙江省水利水电勘测设计院,浙江,杭州,310014
  5. 中国水电顾问集团华东勘测设计研究院,浙江,杭州,310014
  6. 黄河水利委员会西峰水土保持科学试验站,甘肃,庆阳,745000
  7. 吴起县水土保持工作队, 陕西吴起,717600
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目"煤矿开发建设中人为侵蚀机理及新增水土流失预报模型:以神府东胜煤田为例"(40771127);水利部公益性行业专项(201201048),(201201047);中国科学院西部行动计划项目(KZCX2-XB3-13);黄土高原土壤侵蚀与旱地农业国家重点实验室专项(10502-T1)
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2014.03.008
  中图分类号：
- 纸质出版：2014
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
白芸, 王文龙, 黄鹏飞, 等. 神府东胜煤田扰动与原生地面产流产沙规律对比研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2014,33(3):33-38.

BAI Yun, WANG Wen-long, HUANG Peng-fei, et al. Comparative Study of Runoff and Sediment Yielding from Disturbed and Original Sites in Shenfu-Dongsheng Coalfield[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2014, 33(3): 33-38.
白芸, 王文龙, 黄鹏飞, 等. 神府东胜煤田扰动与原生地面产流产沙规律对比研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2014,33(3):33-38. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2014.03.008.

BAI Yun, WANG Wen-long, HUANG Peng-fei, et al. Comparative Study of Runoff and Sediment Yielding from Disturbed and Original Sites in Shenfu-Dongsheng Coalfield[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2014, 33(3): 33-38. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2014.03.008.

摘要

采用野外人工模拟降雨试验方法

对神府东胜煤田开发建设中原生和扰动地面的产流、产沙规律进行了研究。结果表明

扰动地面径流起始时间是原生地面的1.8~11.7倍

径流率比原生地面小5%~54.4%;初始径流含沙量是原生地面的1.1~5.8倍

径流含沙量是原生地面的1.2~6.3倍

产沙量是原生地面的2~12.7倍。由于扰动地面质地疏松

孔隙度大

入渗率大

与原生地面相比

一般在强降水条件下才产流并发生侵蚀。扰动地面临界抗剪力较小

侵蚀一旦发生

在相同降水条件下

更易发生侵蚀

且其侵蚀强度更大。通过回归分析

得出两种下垫面产沙量与水流剪切力呈线性相关。

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate the law of runoff and sediment yielding from original and disturbed sites in the Shenfu-Dongsheng coalfield by a simulated rainfall experiment. Results showed that the time for runoff initiation in disturbed sites was 1.8 to 11.7 times that in original sites. However

runoff rate for disturbed sites was 5% to 54.4% less than that for original sites. The initial sediment concentration

average sediment concentration and sediment yield in disturbed sites were 1.1 to 5.8

1.2 to 6.3

and 2 to 12.7 times of those in original sites

respectively. Runoff and soil erosion in disturbed sites occurred under high intensive rainfall because of lower bulk density

higher porosity and greater infiltration rate as compared with original sites. Once erosion began

disturbed sites were subject to erosion under the same rainfall condition due to smaller critical shear resistance and could result in larger erosion rate. It was found by regression analysis

there existed a linear relationship between sediment yield and flow shear stress.

关键词

Keywords

references

Cooke R U, Doornkamp J C. Geomorphology in environmental management:A new introduction[M]New York:Oxford University Press, 1990.

Carroll C, Merton L, Burger P. Impact of vegetative cover and slope on runoff, erosion, and water quality for field plots on a range of soil and spoil materials on central Queensland coal mines[J]. Australian Journal Soil Research, 2000,2(38):313-327.

Deniz M. Environmental impacts of coal mining and coal utilization in the UK[J]. Acta Montanistica Slovaca, 2010,2(15):134-144.

李锐,唐克丽.神府-东胜矿区一、二期工程环境效应考察[J]. 水土保持研究,1994,1(4):5-17.

Gilley J E, Gee G W, Bauer A. Runoff and erosion characteristics of surface-mined sites in Western North Dakota[J]. Transactions of American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 1977,20(7):697-700.

张胜利,任京柱.开矿对小流域水沙的影响研究[J].水土保持学报,1992,6(2):76-79.

王治国,白中科,赵景奎,等.黄土区大型露天矿排土场岩土侵蚀及其控制技术的研究[J].水土保持学报,1994,8(2):10-17.

白中科,胡振华,王治国.露天矿排土场人为加速侵蚀及分类研究[J].土壤侵蚀与水土保持学报,1998,4(1):34-40.

王文龙,王兆印,李占斌,等.神府东胜煤田开发中扰动地面径流泥沙模拟研究[J].泥沙研究,2006,4(2):60-64.

罗婷,王文龙,王贞,等.神府东胜煤田开发建设中扰动地面产流产沙试验研究[J].西北林学院学报,2011,26(4):59-63.

陈洪松,邵明安,王克林.土壤初始含水率对坡面降雨入渗及土壤水分再分布的影响[J].农业工程学报,2006,22(1):44-47.

张玉斌,郑粉莉.近地表土壤水分条件对坡面土壤侵蚀过程的影响[J].中国水土保持科学,2007,5(2):5-10.

焦菊英,王万忠,郝小品.黄土高原不同类型暴雨的降水侵蚀特征[J].干旱区资源与环境,1999,13(1):34-42.

张汉雄.黄土高原的暴雨特性及其分布规律[J].地理学报,1983,38(4):416-425.

李淼,宋孝玉,沈冰,等.黄土沟壑区不同植被对产流产沙的影响[J].西北农林科技大学学报:自然科学版,2006,34(1):117-120.

Jordán A, Martínez-Zavala L. Soil loss and runoff rates on unpaved forest roads in Southern Spain after simulated rainfall[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2008,255(3/4):913-919.

Bagnold R. An approach to the sediment transport problem from general physics[R]. Geological Survey Professional Paper (United States), 1966:422-437.

浏览量

1201

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

神府东胜煤田扰动地面水流水动力学特征

模拟降雨条件下红壤坡面侵蚀产沙水动力学特征

西北地区生态产品价值实现成效评价——基于29个典型案例

2000—2023年吉林省黑土核心保护区撂荒耕地遥感监测及水土保持效应

干湿循环作用下易溶盐含量对伊犁黄土强度的影响