两种退耕还林模式对土壤微生物优势类群的影响

李姝江; 朱天辉; 刘子雄

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2014.02.040

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

两种退耕还林模式对土壤微生物优势类群的影响

试验研究

- 两种退耕还林模式对土壤微生物优势类群的影响
- Effects of Two Models of Forest Rehabilitation on Dominant Groups of Soil Microbes
- 水土保持通报 2014年33卷第2期页码：186-191
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 四川农业大学林学院,四川,雅安,625014
  2. 四川农业大学长江上游林业生态工程省级重点实验室,四川,雅安,625014
  3. 四川省森林病虫防治检疫总站,四川,成都,610081
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  国家"十五"重大科技攻关项目"四川盆地低山丘陵区水土流失综合治理技术与示范研究"(2001BA606A-0,004BA606A-06)
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2014.02.040
  中图分类号：
- 纸质出版：2014
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
李姝江, 朱天辉, 刘子雄. 两种退耕还林模式对土壤微生物优势类群的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2014,33(2):186-191.

LI Shu-jiang, ZHU Tian-hui, LIU Zi-xiong. Effects of Two Models of Forest Rehabilitation on Dominant Groups of Soil Microbes[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2014, 33(2): 186-191.
李姝江, 朱天辉, 刘子雄. 两种退耕还林模式对土壤微生物优势类群的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2014,33(2):186-191. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2014.02.040.

LI Shu-jiang, ZHU Tian-hui, LIU Zi-xiong. Effects of Two Models of Forest Rehabilitation on Dominant Groups of Soil Microbes[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2014, 33(2): 186-191. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2014.02.040.

摘要

以两种退耕还林模式的桦木林地、苦竹林地和农耕地(对照)为对象

对各样地土壤微生物优势类群数量的季节性动态变化、垂直分布特征及其与土壤酶活性的相关性进行了研究。结果表明

土壤微生物的优势类群为微球菌属(Micrococcus)、芽孢杆菌属(Bacillus)、链霉菌属(Streptomyces)、游动放线菌属(Actinoplanes)、酵母菌(未定属)、木霉菌属(Trichoderma)这6类。两种退耕还林模式下土壤优势微生物类群数量存在差异

春、夏、秋三季均为苦竹林所占比例最大

冬季为桦木林最大。两种林地和农耕地土壤微生物优势类群数量季节性变化规律为微球菌和酵母菌在夏、冬季较大

春、秋季较少;芽孢杆菌在秋季最大

夏季最小;游动放线菌与木霉菌数量在四季中变化不大;链霉菌是夏季最高

冬季最少。各优势微生物类群数量的垂直分布特征表现为微球菌、游动放线菌、木霉菌随土壤层的加深其数量逐渐降低

芽孢杆菌、链霉菌数量则随土壤层的加深而逐渐增加

酵母菌随土壤层的加深其数量减少

但趋势不明显。两种林地对各优势微生物类群数量的根际效应为:链霉菌和木霉菌的R/S值大于1

酵母菌的R/S值小于1

微球菌和游动放线菌在桦木林的R/S值大于1而在苦竹林小于1。在优势微生物类群和土壤酶之间

微球菌与转化酶

芽孢杆菌与纤维素酶

木霉和游动放线菌与过氧化氢酶

酵母与脲酶呈显著正相关关系。

Abstract

Seasonal dynamic variations and vertical distribution characteristics of preponderant groups of soil microbes and their correlations with soil enzymatic activities were studied in Betula luminifera forest

Pleioblastus amarus forest and cropland(control). Results indicated that there were six preponderant species of soil microbes: Micrococcus

Bacillus

Streptomyces

Actinoplanes

yeast(the genus was not identified) and Trichoderma. The amounts of dominant groups of soil microbes had difference between two models of forest rehabilitation: the ratio in P. amarus forest was the largest in spring

summer and autumn

and the ratio of B. luminifera forest was the largest in winter. Seasonal variations of dominant groups of soil microbes in two forests and cropland were that amounts of Micrococcus and yeast were higher in summer and winter than spring and autumn; Bacillus was the highest in autumn and the least in summer; Actinoplanes and Trichoderma were less change than other dominant groups with season; Streptomyces was the highest in summer and the least in winter. Vertical distribution characteristics of dominant groups were that amounts of Micrococcus

Actinoplanes

Trichoderma were reduced gradually with soil depth

but Bacillus and Streptomyces were opposite to them; and change of yeast was not significant with soil depths. Rhizosphere effects showed that R/S values of Streptomyces and Trichoderma were more than 1; R/S value of yeast was less than 1; and R/S value of Micrococcus and Actinoplanes was more than 1 in Betula luminifera forest

but opposite in Pleioblastus amarus forest. There were significant positive correlations between Micrococcus and invertase

Bacillus and cellulase

Actinoplanes-Trichoderma and catalase

and yeast and urease.

关键词

Keywords

references

赵安玖,胡庭兴,李贤伟. 四川省退耕还林模式初探[J]. 四川林勘设计,2001,23(4):16-20, 32.

刘闯,胡庭兴,李强, 等. 巨桉林草间作模式中牧草光合生理生态适应性研究[J]. 草业学报,2008,17(1):58-65.

刘子雄,朱天辉,张健. 两种不同退耕还林模式下的土壤微生物特性研究[J].水土保持学报,2006,20(3):132-135.

荣丽,李贤伟,朱天辉,等. 光皮桦细根与扁穗牛鞭草草根分解的土壤微生物数量及优势类群[J]. 草业学报,2009,18(4):117-124.

周智彬,李培军. 塔克拉玛干沙漠腹地人工绿地土壤中微生物的生态分布及其与土壤因子间的关系[J].应用生态学报,2003,14(8):1246-1250.

杨玉盛,邱仁辉,俞新妥,等. 杉木连栽土壤微生物及生化特性的研究[J]. 生物多样性,1999,7(1):1-7.

Zelles L. Fatty acid patterns of phospholipids and lipopolysaccharides in the characterization of microbial communities in soil:A review[J]. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 1999, 29(2):111-129.

Baltramaityte D, Rutkoviene V, Svirskiene A. Changes of soil microorganism coenosis composition and enzymic activity in different farming systems on Calc(ar)I:Epigleic Luvisol soil[J]. Zemdirbyste, Mokslo-Darbai, 2000, 72:252-267.

《中国森林》编辑委员会. 中国森林[M]. 北京:中国林业出版社, 2000:1355-1359, 1920-1923.

辉朝茂,杜凡,杨宇明. 竹类培育与利用[M]. 北京:中国林业出版社, 1996:59-62.

徐秋芳,姜培坤. 毛竹竹根区土壤微生物数量与酶活性研究[J]. 林业科学研究,2001,14(6):648-652.

杨承栋,焦如珍. 杉木人工林根际土壤性质变化的研究[J]. 林业科学,1999,35(6):2-9.

中国科学院南京土壤研究所微生物室. 土壤微生物研究法[M]. 北京:科学出版社,1985:40-179.

赵斌,何绍江. 微生物学实验[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2002:20-92.

关松荫. 土壤酶及其研究法[M]. 北京:农业出版社,1986.

杨承栋. 森林土壤研究几个方面的进展[J]. 世界林业研究,1994,7(4):14-20.

厉婉华. 苏南丘陵区不同林分下根际根外土壤微生物区系及酶活性[J]. 生态学杂志,1994,13(6):11-14.

章家恩,刘文高,王伟胜. 南亚热带不同植被根际微生物数量与根际土壤养分状况[J]. 土壤与环境,2002,11(3):279-282.

浏览量

1153

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

不同空间尺度耕地埂坎提取方法及其分布特征

宁东煤电基地水土资源特征及其变化

新疆典型小流域土壤水稳性团聚体分布特征研究

陕北黄土区阳坡微地形土壤水分特征研究

狗牙根根系分布特征及其抗拉强度试验研究