1. 江西省红壤研究所,江西,南昌,331717
2. 国家红壤改良工程技术研究中心,江西,南昌,331717
纸质出版:2014
移动端阅览
钟义军, 武琳, 黄欠如, 等. 苎麻对红壤旱地土壤团聚体及其特性的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2014,33(2):78-82.
ZHONG Yi-jun, WU Lin, HUANG Qian-ru, et al. Effect of Ramie on Soil Aggregate and Its Characteristics in Red Soil Region of South China[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2014, 33(2): 78-82.
钟义军, 武琳, 黄欠如, 等. 苎麻对红壤旱地土壤团聚体及其特性的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2014,33(2):78-82. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2014.02.017.
ZHONG Yi-jun, WU Lin, HUANG Qian-ru, et al. Effect of Ramie on Soil Aggregate and Its Characteristics in Red Soil Region of South China[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2014, 33(2): 78-82. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2014.02.017.
采用干、湿筛法研究了种植苎麻和花生对红壤旱地土壤团聚体及其特性的影响
并比较分析了土壤团聚体及土壤理化性质与地表径流和土壤侵蚀量的关系。结果表明:(1)与花生地相比
苎麻地有机质、田间持水量、总孔隙度、沙粒分别升高了28.44%
10.06%
5.65%和53.13%
土壤容重、粉粒和黏粒则分别降低了7.20%
14.85%和34.95%
均达显著性差异水平(p<0.05)。(2)团聚体平均重量直径(MWD)、稳定性指数(ASI)显著升高(p<0.01)
苎麻地土壤团聚体稳定性优于花生地; (3)两处理均以0.25~1 mm粒径团聚体保存几率最大
抗水蚀能力最强。(4)地表径流量和土壤侵蚀量与土壤有机质、沙粒含量、>1 mm的干团聚体、>0.5 mm的水稳性团聚体、MWD以及ASI呈极显著负相关关系(p<0.01)
而与粉粒、黏粒、<0.25 mm干团聚体、<0.053 mm的水稳性团聚体、呈极显著正相关关系(p<0.01)。
The effect of soil physical and chemical properties
soil aggregate and its characteristics of planting ramie and peanuts in red soil were studied by dry
wet sieving method. Moreover
the relationship between soil aggregates and surface runoff and soil erosion were also analyzed. The results indicated that: (1) After three years by planting ramie
soil organic matter
field capacity
total porosity
grains of sand were increased 28.44%
10.06%
5.65%
28.44%
soil bulk density
silt
and clay were reduced by 7.20%
14.85%
34.95%(p<0.05); (2) Mean weight diameter(MWD)
stability index(ASI) of soil aggregate by planting ramie were significantly higher than that of planting peanut
soil aggregate stability of planting ramie was better than that of peanuts; (3) 0.25~1 mm aggregates is the best chance of preservation of the red soil
and the resist-erosion ability also the strongest. (4) Surface runoff and soil erosion
with soil organic matter
sand content
>1 mm dry aggregates
>0.5 mm water stable aggregates
MWD
ASI were negatively correlated(p<0.01)
but were significantly positively correlated with silt
clay content
<0.25 mm
dry aggregates
and <0.053 mm water stable aggregates.
蔡立群,齐鹏,张仁陆.保护性耕作对麦-豆轮作条件下土壤团聚体组成及有机碳含量的影响[J].水土保持学报,2008,22(2):141-145.
陈恩凤,周礼恺,武冠云.微团聚体的保肥供肥性能及其组成比例在评判土壤肥力水平中的意义[J].土壤学报, 1994,31(1):18-25.
Dexter A R. Advances in characterization of soil structure[J]. Soil & Tillage Research, 1988, 11(3/4):199-238.
Yoder R E. A direct method of aggregate analysis of soils and a study of the physical nature of erosion losses[J]. Journal of the American Society of Agronomy, 1936,28(5):337-351.
杨如萍,郭贤仕,吕军峰. 不同耕作和种植模式对土壤团聚体分布及稳定性的影响[J].水土保持学报,2010,24(1):252-256.
杨培岭,罗远培,石元春.用粒径的重量分布表征的土壤分形特征[J].科学通报,1993,38(20):1896-1899.
石辉. 转移矩阵法评价土壤团聚体的稳定性[J].水土保持通报,2006,26(3):91-95.
赵其国,谢为民,贺湘逸,等.江西红壤[M].江西南昌:江西科学技术出版社,1988:76-89.
陈永强.侵蚀红壤肥力退化评价指标体系[J].水土保持学报,2001,15(2):72-75.
孙波,赵其国. 红壤退化中的土壤质量评价指标及评价方法[J].地球科学进展,1999,18(2):118-128.
肖荣诂.江西省水土流失现状及其防治对策[J]. 水土保持学报, 1994,14(3):39-43.
卿太明. 苎麻保持水土效益初步研究[J]. 中国水土保持, 1991(8):29-30,57.
廖绵清,李靖,黄欠如.低丘红壤坡耕地苎麻与花生水土保持效果对比研究[J].土壤,2011, 43(4):657-661.
鲁如坤.土壤农业化学分析方法[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社,1999.
中国科学院南京土壤研究所.土壤理化分析[M].上海:上海科技出版社,1978.
吕文星,张洪江,王伟.重庆四面山不同林地土壤团聚体特征[J].水土保持学报,2010,24(4):192-197.
卢金伟,李占斌.土壤团聚体研究进展[J].水土保持研究,2002,9(1):81-85.
骆东奇,侯春霞,魏朝富,等. 紫色土团聚体抗蚀特征研究[J].水土保持学报,2003,17(2):20-23.
孙永丽,梅再生.贵阳市白云岩地区不同土地利用方式对土壤物理性质的影响[J].贵州师范大学学报, 2006, 24(2):27-31.
刘文利,罗广军.不同林型下土壤物化性质的差异研究[J].吉林林业科技,2006,35(1):26-34.
周虎,吕贻忠,杨志臣,等.保护性耕作对华北平原土壤团聚体特征的影响[J].中国农业科学2007,40(9):1973-1979.
0
浏览量
1315
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621