1. 昆明理工大学环境科学与工程学院,云南,昆明,650093
2. 西南林业大学,云南,昆明,650224
3. 云南省林业科学院,云南,昆明,650204
纸质出版:2014
移动端阅览
刘芝芹, 郎南军, 彭明俊, 等. 金沙江流域典型森林土壤水分入渗特征试验研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2014,33(2):43-47.
LIU Zhi-qin, LANG Nan-jun, PENG Ming-jun, et al. Infiltration Characteristics of Different Forest Soils in Jingsha River Basin[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2014, 33(2): 43-47.
刘芝芹, 郎南军, 彭明俊, 等. 金沙江流域典型森林土壤水分入渗特征试验研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2014,33(2):43-47. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2014.02.010.
LIU Zhi-qin, LANG Nan-jun, PENG Ming-jun, et al. Infiltration Characteristics of Different Forest Soils in Jingsha River Basin[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2014, 33(2): 43-47. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2014.02.010.
对金沙江流域典型森林生态系统的土壤水文特征进行了研究。结果表明
研究区不同森林类型的土壤容重随着土层深度的增加而逐渐增大
土壤总孔隙度和毛管孔隙度随土层深度的增加而逐渐减小;土壤水分入渗受土壤容重的影响
随容重增加
稳渗率降低;不同森林类型土壤前120 min平均入渗速率介于0.78~2.42 mm/min之间
稳渗率介于0.10~0.53 mm/min之间;无论是平均入渗率还是稳渗率均表现为:华山松林地> 滇杨林地> 圣诞树林地> 水冬瓜林地> 荒坡地;土壤入渗的渗润阶段发生在0~5 min;渗漏阶段约发生在5~80 min;渗透阶段发生在80 min以后。采用Kostiakov模型拟合双环入渗法测得的入渗过程效果最佳
其次为Philip模型
而用Horton模型的拟合效果最差。
Soil hydrological characteristics were studied for different forest ecosystems in Jingsha River basin. Results showed that soil bulk density increased with the increase in soil depth
while total soil porosity and capillary porosity decreased. Average infiltration rates of different forest soil types ranged from 0.78 to 2.42 mm/min and stable infiltration rates ranged from 0.10 to 0.53 mm/min. Average and stable infiltration rates presented such an order as: Pinus armandii forest land> Pobulus yunnenensis forest land> Acacia bealbata forest land> Aluns cremastogyne forest land>wasteland. The transient phase of infiltration occurred in the first 5 min
the gradual phase occurred between 5 and 80 min
and the stable phase occurred after 80 min. Kostiakov Model best fitted the infiltration process determined by double-ring method compared with Philip and Horton Model.
张洪江,王礼先.长江三峡花岗岩坡面土壤流失特性及其系统动力学仿真[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1997:34-36.
John D V. New linearized two-parameter infiltration equation for direct determination of conductivity and sorptivity[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2010,384(2):1-13.
赵鹏宇,徐学选,刘普灵.黄土丘陵区不同土地利用方式土壤入渗规律研究[J].水土保持通报,2009,29(1):40-44.
杨海龙,朱金兆,毕利东.三峡库区森林流域生态系统土壤渗透性能的研究[J].水土保持学报,2003,17(3):63-66.
傅斌,王玉宽,朱波,等.紫色土坡耕地降雨入渗试验研究[J].农业工程学报,2008,24(7):39-43.
姜海燕,赵雨森,陈祥伟,等.大兴安岭岭南几种主要森林类型土壤水文功能研究[J].水土保持学报,2007,21(3):149-153.
王纪杰,俞元春,陈容.不同栽培代次、林龄的桉树人工林土壤渗透性研究[J].水土保持学报,2011,25(2):78-84.
陈洪松,邵明安.黄土坡地土壤水分运动与转化机理研究进展[J].水科学进展,2003,14(4):513-520.
张治伟,朱章雄,王燕,等.岩溶坡地不同利用类型土壤入渗性能及其影响因素[J].农业工程学报,2010,26(6):71-77.
Liu Zhiqin, Lang Nanjun, Wang Keqin. Infiltration Characteristics Under Different Land Uses in Yuanmou Dry-Hot Valley Area[C]//GCN:Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering. 2013:567-572.
Su Ninghu. Theory of infiltration:Infiltration into swelling soils in a material coordinate[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2010,395(1):103-108.
Jimenez C C, Tejedor M, Morillas G, et al. Infiltration rate in and soils:Effect of changes in vegetation cover(Tenerife Spain)[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2006,61(3):153-158.
王健,吴发启,孟秦倩,等.不同利用类型土壤水分下渗特征试验研究[J].干旱地区农业研究,2006,24(6):159-163.
Kostiakov A N. On the dynamics of the coeffient of water percolation in soils and on the necessity of studying it from adynamic point of view for purposes of amelioration[J]. Soil Sci., 1932,97(1):17-21.
Philip J R. The theory of infiltration about captivity and algebraic infiltration equations[J]. Soil Sci., 1957,84(4), 257-264.
Horton R E. An approach toward a physical interpretation of in filtration capacity[J]. Soil Sci., Soc. Am. Proc., 1940,5(3):399-417.
陈建刚,李启军,侯旭峰,等.妫水河流域不同植被覆盖条件下土壤入渗及模型的比较分析[J].中国水土保持科学,2004,2(3):22-26.
吕刚,张由松,祝业平. 老秃顶子自然保护区不同森林类型土壤贮水与入渗特征研究[J] 水土保持通报2011,31(1):109-113.
刘丽红,蒋勇军,王翱宇,等.岩溶槽谷区不同土地利用方式土壤入渗规律研究[J].水土保持通报,2010,30(4):51-57.
0
浏览量
1342
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621