1. 德州学院,山东,德州,253023
2. 山东省林业科学研究院,山东,济南,250014
纸质出版:2014
移动端阅览
井大炜. 不同覆膜方式对杨树林下土壤物理性状及呼吸速率的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2014,33(2):38-42.
JING Da-wei. Effects of Different Plastic Film Mulching on Soil Physical Properties and Respiration Rate of Poplar Forest[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2014, 33(2): 38-42.
井大炜. 不同覆膜方式对杨树林下土壤物理性状及呼吸速率的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2014,33(2):38-42. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2014.02.009.
JING Da-wei. Effects of Different Plastic Film Mulching on Soil Physical Properties and Respiration Rate of Poplar Forest[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2014, 33(2): 38-42. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2014.02.009.
在大田条件下
研究了白膜覆盖和黑膜覆盖对欧美I-107杨林下土壤0-40 cm土层的温度、含水量、容重、孔隙度和土壤呼吸速率的影响。结果表明
在两种覆膜方式中
白膜覆盖的增温效应优于黑膜覆盖
而对土壤含水量的影响无显著差异。0-20 cm土层白膜覆盖和黑膜覆盖处理均显著提高了土壤总孔隙度、毛管孔隙度和非毛管孔隙度
而土壤容重却明显降低
分别比对照降低15.44%和9.56%;此外
白膜覆盖的土壤呼吸速率与对照差异不显著
而黑膜覆盖显著低于对照。20-40 cm土层与0-20 cm土层表现出基本一致的变化规律
但两种覆膜方式与对照之间的差异均变小
表明随着土层的加深
覆膜的影响作用减弱。说明白膜和黑膜覆盖均可明显改善表层土壤的物理性状
但黑膜覆盖明显抑制了土壤呼吸。在两种覆膜方式中
白膜覆盖的作用效果明显优于黑膜覆盖。
A field experiment of three treatments
i.e.
traditional cultivation without mulching(CK)
white plastic mulching(WM) and black plastic mulching(BM) was designed and performed to determine the effects of film mulching on soil temperature
water content
bulk density
and porosity and respiration rate in the 0-40 cm soil layer under Populus euramericana. Results indicated that the WM treatment had better warming effect than the BM treatment
but had no significant difference in the soil water content. In the 0-20 cm layer
the WM and BM treatments significantly increased the soil total porosity
capillary porosity and non-capillary porosity and however
the soil bulk density was visibly decreased
which was reduced by 15.44% and 9.56%
respectively. Besides
the soil respiration rate in the WM treatment had no significant difference as compared with CK
but the soil respiration rate in the BM treatment was obviously decreased. The 20-40 cm soil layer showed the variation trend similar to the 0-20 cm soil layer
while the differences among CK
WM and BM were decreased in the 20-40 cm soil layer
demonstrating that the effects of plastic film mulching on poplar weakened with the increasing of soil depth. In conclusion
the two plastic film mulching treatments significantly ameliorated the physical property of topsoil
while the black plastic mulching treatment evidently inhibited the soil respiration. Therefore
the white plastic mulching was obviously better than the black plastic mulching.
张成娥,梁银丽,贺秀斌. 地膜覆盖玉米对土壤微生物量的影响[J].生态学报,2002,22(4):508-512.
陈永祥,刘孝义,刘明国. 地膜覆盖栽培的土壤结构与空气状况研究[J].沈阳农业大学学报,1995,26(2):146-151.
员学锋,吴普特,汪有科. 地膜覆盖保墒灌溉的土壤水、热以及作物效应研究[J].灌溉排水学报,2006,25(1):25-29.
李非里,刘丛强,杨元根,等. 覆膜对土壤-青菜体系Cu和Zn迁移特性的影响[J]. 生态与农村环境学报,2009,25(2):54-58.
宋秋华,李凤民,王俊,等. 覆膜对春小麦农田微生物数量和土壤养分的影响[J].生态学报,2002,22(12):2125-2132.
李兆君,李万峰,解晓瑜,等.覆膜对不同施肥条件下玉米苗期生长和光合及生理参数的影响[J].核农学报,2010,24(2):360-364.
王世绩.杨树研究进展[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1995.
蔡昆争,骆世明,方祥. 水稻覆膜旱作对根叶性状、土壤养分和土壤微生物活性的影响[J].生态学报,2006,26(6):1903-1911.
鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2000.
王芸,李增嘉,韩宾,等.保护性耕作对土壤微生物量及活性的影响[J].生态学报,2007,27(8):3384-3390.
王树森,邓根之.地膜覆盖增温机制研究[J].中国农业科学,1991,24(3):74-78.
李世清,李凤民,宋秋华,等.半干旱地区不同地膜覆盖时期对土壤氮素有效性的影响[J].生态学报,2001,21(9):1519-1526.
王俊,李凤民,宋秋华,等.地膜覆盖对土壤水温和春小麦产量形成的影响[J].应用生态学报,2003,14(2):205-210.
韩玉平.崆峒区全膜双垄沟播玉米推广中存在的问题及建议[J].甘肃农业科技, 2011(4):41-43.
高绪科,王文清.旱地麦田蓄水保墒耕作措施的研究[J].干旱地区农业研究,1991(4):1-9.
刘瑜,褚贵新,梁永超,等.不同种植方式对北疆绿洲土壤养分和生物学性状的影响[J].中国生态农业学报,2010,18(3):465-471.
陈锡时,郭树凡,汪景宽,等. 地膜覆盖栽培对土壤微生物种群和生物活性的影响[J].应用生态学报,1998,9(4):435-439.
李玉宁,王关玉,李伟.土壤呼吸作用和全球碳循环[J].地学前缘,2002,9(2):351-357.
0
浏览量
917
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621