1. 福建师范大学地理科学学院,福建,福州,350007
2. 福建省宁化县水土保持站, 福建宁化,365400
纸质出版:2014
移动端阅览
鄢新余, 陈志强, 黄锦祥, 等. 南方红壤侵蚀区典型小流域土壤侵蚀敏感性研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2014,33(2):7-10.
YAN Xin-yu, CHEN Zhi-qiang, HUANG Jin-xiang, et al. Sensitivity of Soil Erosion in Typical Small Watershed in Eroded Red Soil Region in South China[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2014, 33(2): 7-10.
鄢新余, 陈志强, 黄锦祥, 等. 南方红壤侵蚀区典型小流域土壤侵蚀敏感性研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2014,33(2):7-10. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2014.02.002.
YAN Xin-yu, CHEN Zhi-qiang, HUANG Jin-xiang, et al. Sensitivity of Soil Erosion in Typical Small Watershed in Eroded Red Soil Region in South China[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2014, 33(2): 7-10. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2014.02.002.
选取降雨侵蚀力、地形坡度、植被覆盖度、土壤类型和土地利用5个因子作为评价指标
借助ArcGIS空间分析功能
评价了南方红壤侵蚀区朱溪小流域的土壤侵蚀敏感性。结果表明:(1)流域内土壤侵蚀以敏感级别面积最大
占总面积的55.96%;其次为轻度敏感
占38.62%;高度敏感和不敏感分布较小
分别占4.22%和1.20%;而极敏感区面积极小
仅占0.001%; (2)流域东部、中部和西部地区土壤侵蚀敏感性都以轻度敏感和敏感占绝对比例
不敏感和高度敏感比例很小
极敏感区都分布在中部
但东部敏感性总体上高于中部和西部; (3)土壤侵蚀敏感性与土壤侵蚀现状在空间分布上总体吻合度不高
土壤侵蚀敏感性以敏感级别比例最大
而土壤侵蚀强度却以微度侵蚀为主
其主要原因是人类活动的影响。
Five factors affecting soil erosion were chosen including precipitation
topology
soil texture
vegetation cover and land use to evaluate the soil erosion sensitivity in Zhuxi small watershed using the spatial analysis function of ArcGIS. The results showed that: (1) The area of high sensitivity is largest
accounting for 55.96% of total area; followed by percentage of slight sensitivity
which account for 38.62% of the total area; the percentage of high sensitivity and none sensitivity erosion are low
accounting for 4.22% and 1.20% respectively.However
the area with extrem sensitivity erosion only accounts 0.001%; (2) The erosion of slight sensitivity and sensitivity are the main types of soil erosion in the east
middle and west of the whole watershed
and the proportions of high and none sensitivity area are small. Extreme erosion sensitivity area spreads in the middle of the watershed. Generally
the erosion sensitivity in the east is higher than that in the central and west of the watershed; (3) The soil erosion sensitivities are not consistent with soil erosion degree in many regions
because the human activities are the main factors affecting the soil erosion in this area. The proportion of erosion sensitivity is the largest
nevertheless the main degree type of soil erosion is micro erosion.
徐天献,王玉宽,傅斌. 汶川地震重灾区土壤侵蚀敏感性评价[J]. 中国水土保持,2011(1):39-42.
苏泳娴,黄光庆,陈修治,等. 基于GIS和RS的红壤丘陵区土壤侵蚀敏感性评价研究[J]. 安徽农业科学,2011,39(22):13458-13462,13520.
Martin A, Gunter J T, Regens J L. Estimating erosion in a riverine watershed:Bayou Liberty-Tchefuncta River in Louisiana[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2003, 10(4):245-250.
Lud L, Valladaresgs E. Mapping soil erosion risk in Rondonia, Brazilian Amazonia:Using RUSLE, remote sensing and GIS[J]. Land Degradation and Development, 2004, 15(5):499-512.
陈燕红,潘文斌,蔡芫镔. 基于RUSLE的流域土壤侵蚀敏感性评价:以福建省吉溪流域为例[J]. 山地学报,2007,25(4):490-496.
李月臣,刘春霞,赵纯勇,等. 三峡库区(重庆段)土壤侵蚀敏感性评价及其空间分异特征[J]. 生态学报,2009,29(2):788-796.
陈志强,陈志彪,陈丽慧. 南方红壤侵蚀区典型流域土壤侵蚀危险性评价[J]. 土壤学报,2011,48(5):1080-1082.
陈丽慧. 基于多源信息的土壤侵蚀敏感性及其生态环境效应研究:以朱溪河小流域为例[D]. 福建福州:福建师范大学,2009.
周伏建,黄炎和. 福建省降雨侵蚀力指标
R
值[J]. 水土保持学报,1995,9(1):13-18.
王美芝,许兆义,杨成永. 路堤边坡土壤类型对水土流失影响的试验研究[J]. 水土保持学报,2004,18(3):16-19.
Williams J R, Renard K G, Dyke P T. EPIC:A new method for assessing erosion's effect on soil productivity[J]. Soil and Water Conservation, 1983, 38(5):381-383.
蔡崇法,丁树文,史志华,等. 应用USLE模型与地理信息系统IDRISI预测小流域土壤侵蚀量的研究[J]. 水土保持学报,2000,14(2):19-24.
0
浏览量
1231
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621