不同菌根类型森林净初级生产力对降水的响应

石兆勇; 张凯; 苗艳芳; 王发园

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2014.01.001

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

不同菌根类型森林净初级生产力对降水的响应

试验研究

- 不同菌根类型森林净初级生产力对降水的响应
- Responses of Net Primary Productivity to Precipitation in Forests Dominated by Different Mycorrhizal Types
- 水土保持通报 2014年33卷第1期页码：14-19
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 河南科技大学农学院,河南,洛阳,471003
  2. 北京大学地表过程分析与模拟教育部重点实验室,北京,100871
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目"我国东部主要森林植被类型土壤呼吸的地理分异及其机制"(40971150);北京大学地表过程分析与模拟教育部重点实验室开放基金项目"菌根对森林土壤呼吸的贡献及其机制"(20120104);河南科技大学创新能力培育基金"秦岭伏牛山AM真菌多样性及其与植物多样性的关系"(2009CZ0006)
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2014.01.001
  中图分类号：
- 纸质出版：2014
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
石兆勇, 张凯, 苗艳芳, 等. 不同菌根类型森林净初级生产力对降水的响应[J]. 水土保持通报, 2014,33(1):14-19.

SHI Zhao-yong, ZHANG Kai, MIAO Yan-fang, et al. Responses of Net Primary Productivity to Precipitation in Forests Dominated by Different Mycorrhizal Types[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2014, 33(1): 14-19.
石兆勇, 张凯, 苗艳芳, 等. 不同菌根类型森林净初级生产力对降水的响应[J]. 水土保持通报, 2014,33(1):14-19. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2014.01.001.

SHI Zhao-yong, ZHANG Kai, MIAO Yan-fang, et al. Responses of Net Primary Productivity to Precipitation in Forests Dominated by Different Mycorrhizal Types[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2014, 33(1): 14-19. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2014.01.001.

摘要

基于全球森林数据库

建立了包括全球森林的菌根类型、净初级生产力(NPP)和年平均降水量等指标的新数据库

分析了6种菌根类型森林的各组分NPP对年平均降水量变化的响应。结果表明

在所有菌根类型的森林中

森林总NPP、地上NPP和树叶NPP都随年平均降水量的升高呈现上升的趋势;地下NPP、树木主干NPP以及细根和粗根NPP则因菌根类型的不同

对年平均降水量的增加呈现出降低或升高的趋势。从全球森林总NPP随年平均降水量变化的响应程度来看

年平均降水量对丛枝菌根+外生菌根类型森林总NPP变异的解释率最高

为31.79%;而对外生菌根+内外生菌根类型森林的解释率则最低

仅为4.85%。可见

菌根影响着森林NPP对降水量变化的响应程度

表明菌根类型是预测降水变化对森林NPP影响的重要指标。

Abstract

A new database was established

including the indexes such as different mycorrhizal types

net primary production(NPP) and average annual precipitation(MAP) of forests

based on the global forest database. The new database was used to study the responses of NPP of the forests to MAP change. Of all forests dominated by six different mycorrhizal types

the total NPP

aboveground NPP and tree leaf NPP increased with increasing MAP. However

the belowground NPP

stem NPP

and fine and coarse NPP presented a trend of either increase or decrease with the enhancement of MAP in the forests. As far as the responses of forest total NPP to MAP change concerned

the highest explanation(31.79%) of MAP change to the variation of total NPP was observed in the forest dominated by arbuscular mycorrhiza+ecto-mycorrhiza type. Contrarily

the MAP change only explained the 4.85% of the variation of total NPP in the forest dominated by ecto-mycorrhiza+ectendomycorrhiza type

which was the lowest explanation in all the six forests. We conclude that different mycorrhizas affect the extent of response of forest NPP to MAP change. Mycorrhizal type is an important index for accurate prediction of future change of forest NPP with change of precipitation.

关键词

Keywords

references

Fang Jingyun. Forest productivity in China and its response to global climate change[J]. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 2000,24(5):513-517.

Nemani R R, Keeling C D, Hashimoto H, et al. Climate-driven increases in global terrestrial net primary production from 1982 to 1999[J]. Science, 2003,300(5625):1560-1563.

Zhao M S, Running S W. Drought-induced reduction in global terrestrial net primary production from 2000 through 2009[J]. Science, 2010,329(5994):940-943.

Lieth H, Whittaker R H. Primary productivity of the biosphere[M]. New York:Springer Verlag, 1975.

Brown S, Sathaye J, Canell M, et al. Mitigation of carbon emission to the atmosphere by forest management[J]. Commonwealth Forestry Review, 1996,75(1):80-91.

方精云,柯金虎,唐志尧,等.生物生产力的"4P"概念、估算及其相互关系[J].植物生态学报,2001,25(4):414-419.

方精云,陈安平,赵淑清,等.中国森林生物量的估算[J].植物生态学报,2002,26(2):243-249.

Hicke J A, Asner G P, Randerson J T, et al. Trends in North American net primary productivity derived from satellite observations, 1982-1998[J]. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 2002,16(2):1018-1031.

Piao Shirong, Fang Jingyun Y, Zhou Liming, et al. Changes in vegetation net primary productivity from 1982 to 1999 in China[J]. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 2005,19(2):1027-1042.

刘曦,国庆喜,刘经伟.IBIS模拟东北东部森林NPP主要影响因子的敏感性[J].生态学报,2011,31(7):1772-1782.

毛德华,王宗明,罗玲,等.1982-2009年东北多年冻土区植被净初级生产力动态及其对全球变化的响应[J]. 应用生态学报,2012,23(6):511-1519.

Smith S E, Read D J, Mycorrhizal Symbiosis[M].3rd ed. London:Elsevier Ltd, 2008.

Heijden M G A van der, Klironomos J N, Ursic M, et al. Mycorrhizal fungal diversity determines plant biodiversity, ecosystem variability and productivity[J]. Nature, 1998,396(5):69-72.

石兆勇,刘德鸿,王发园,等.菌根类型对森林树木净初级生产力的影响[J].生态环境学报,2012,21(3):404-408.

Cornelissen J H C, Aerts R, Cerabolini B, et al. Carbon cycling traits of plant species are linked with mycorrhizal strategy[J]. Oecologia, 2001,129(4):611-619.

Vogt K A, Grier C C, Meier C E, et al. Mycorrhizal role in net primary production and nutrient cycling in Abies amabilis ecosystems in Western Washington[J]. Ecology, 1982,63(2):370-380.

Vargas R, Baldocchi D D, Querejeta J I, et al. Ecosystem CO

fluxes of arbuscular and ectomycorrhizal dominated vegetation types are differentially influenced by precipitation and temperature[J]. New Phytologist, 2010,185(1):226-236.

石兆勇, 王发园, 苗艳芳.不同菌根类型的森林净初级生产力对气温变化的响应[J].植物生态学报,2012,36(11):1165-1171.

Luyssaert S, Inglima I, Jung M, et al. CO

balance of boreal, temperate, and tropical forests derived from a global data base[J]. Global Change Biology, 2007,13(12):2509-2537.

Querejeta J I, Egerton-Warburton L M, Allen M F. Direct nocturnal water transfer from oaks to their mycorrhizal symbionts during severe soil drying[J]. Oecologia, 2003,134(1):55-64.

Fitter A H. Water relations of red clover,

Trifolium pratense

L., as affected by VA mycorrhizal infection and phosphorus supply before and during drought[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 1988,39(5):595-603.

Marjanovic Z, Uehlein N, Kaldenhoff R, et al. Aquaporins in poplar:What a difference a symbiont makes[J]. Planta, 2005,222(2):258-268.

Marjanovic Z, Uwe N, Hampp R. Mycorrhiza formation enhances adaptive response of hybrid poplar to drought[J]. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2005,1048(6):496-499.

浏览量

1310

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

森林主导生态价值评估及生态补偿初探

祁连山排露沟小流域土壤物理性质空间差异研究

星载雷达影像对盐渍地微观离子的响应研究

4种典型荒漠草原植物群落土壤呼吸对封育禁牧的响应

大小兴安岭林区不同林型土壤养分综合评价