激光衍射法与吸管法对东北黑土区土壤粒径分布测定的差异性研究

王彬; 郑粉莉; 安娟; 吕春花

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

激光衍射法与吸管法对东北黑土区土壤粒径分布测定的差异性研究

论文

- 激光衍射法与吸管法对东北黑土区土壤粒径分布测定的差异性研究
- Comparative Study of Particle Size Distribution by Laser Diffraction Method and Pipette Method in Black Soil Region of Northeast China
- 水土保持通报 2009年28卷第2期页码：134-139
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 西北农林科技大学资源环境学院陕西杨凌,712100
  2. 中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所黄土高原土壤侵蚀与旱地农业国家重点实验室陕西杨凌,712100
  4. 中国科学院研究生院,北京,100049
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  国家重点基础研究发展计划项目“不同类型区土壤侵蚀过程及其机理”(2007CB407201);中国科学院西部行动计划(二期)项目“水文过程响应及其模拟”(KZCX2-XB2-05-03);西北农林科技大学创新团队计划项目“土壤侵蚀及其治理环境效应评价”(01140202)
- DOI：
  中图分类号：
- 纸质出版：2009
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
王彬, 郑粉莉, 安娟, 等. 激光衍射法与吸管法对东北黑土区土壤粒径分布测定的差异性研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2009,28(2):134-139.

WANG Bin, ZHENG Fen-li, AN Juan, et al. Comparative Study of Particle Size Distribution by Laser Diffraction Method and Pipette Method in Black Soil Region of Northeast China[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2009, 28(2): 134-139.
王彬, 郑粉莉, 安娟, 等. 激光衍射法与吸管法对东北黑土区土壤粒径分布测定的差异性研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2009,28(2):134-139. DOI：

WANG Bin, ZHENG Fen-li, AN Juan, et al. Comparative Study of Particle Size Distribution by Laser Diffraction Method and Pipette Method in Black Soil Region of Northeast China[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2009, 28(2): 134-139. DOI：

摘要

目前激光衍射法(laser diffraction method

LD)逐步被用于土壤颗粒粒径分布(particle size distribution

PSD)的分析

为了对比LD法和吸管法测定东北黑土区土壤PSD的差异性

采用LD法和吸管法分别对东北黑土区宾州河流域36个土壤剖面不同层次178个土壤样品的PSD值进行了测定与分析。结果表明

同吸管法相比

LD法低估了土壤的黏粒含量

平均低估幅度19.69%

而高估了土壤的粉粒和砂粒含量

平均高估幅度分别为14.66%和5.13%。LD法所得PSD结果依据美国土壤质地分类制判定的土壤质地

相对于吸管法总体由粉黏质偏向粉砂质方向。建立了LD法与吸管法测定PSD结果的转换模型

将LD法测定的PSD结果利用转换模型校正后

其测定的各土壤粒级同吸管法相比

准确度达96.97%～98.71%

判定土壤质地的准确率也达83.15%。

Abstract

Laser diffraction method(LD method) has been regarded as an effective method of measuring soil particle size distribution( PSD) in recent years. In order to compare PSD difference in measurements by LD method and pipette method in black soil region

178 soil samples collected from various layers of 36 soil profiles were analyzed by LD method and traditional pipette method. Results showed that，compared with pipette method，clay content by LD method was under-estimated by 19. 69 0 o，and silt and sand contents were overestimated by 14. 66%and 5. 13%，respectively. According to US soil texture classification

soil texture varied from silt and clay texture to sand and silt texture

compared with pipette method. For clay，silt and sand particles

three PSD transform models between LD method and pipette method were built. When the transform models were used to revise PSD by LD method

the accuracy of measured PSD was 96. 97%~98. 71%and the accuracy of determined soil texture classification reached 83. 15%by LD.

关键词

Keywords

references

浏览量

1402

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

吸管法与扫描电镜法测定中国水蚀区典型土壤粒径分布对比

典型干旱区山地-绿洲-荒漠生态系统服务价值的时空演变——以玛纳斯河流域为例

干湿循环作用下易溶盐含量对伊犁黄土强度的影响

不同改良剂对滨海盐渍土盐分离子及玉米生长的影响

城乡融合背景下秦巴山区县域“三生”空间时空演变